Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gh-85454: Remove distutils.ccompiler from Tools/c-analyzer #95171

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2022

Conversation

corona10
Copy link
Member

@corona10 corona10 commented Jul 23, 2022

@@ -168,9 +170,17 @@ def handling_errors(ignore_exc=None, *, log_err=None):
}


def _get_default_compiler():
Copy link
Member Author

@corona10 corona10 Jul 23, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minimalized ported version from

def get_default_compiler(osname=None, platform=None):
"""Determine the default compiler to use for the given platform.
osname should be one of the standard Python OS names (i.e. the
ones returned by os.name) and platform the common value
returned by sys.platform for the platform in question.
The default values are os.name and sys.platform in case the
parameters are not given.
"""
if osname is None:
osname = os.name
if platform is None:
platform = sys.platform
for pattern, compiler in _default_compilers:
if re.match(pattern, platform) is not None or \
re.match(pattern, osname) is not None:
return compiler
# Default to Unix compiler
return 'unix'

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It may be worth having a short comment indicating this was derived from the distutils code.

@@ -168,9 +170,17 @@ def handling_errors(ignore_exc=None, *, log_err=None):
}


def _get_default_compiler():
if re.match('cygwin.*', sys.platform) is not None:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can just remove cygwin as it is unsupported.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are you sure?

Copy link
Member Author

@corona10 corona10 Jul 24, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have a bunch of Cygwin-related codes (__CYGWIN__) in CPython code base, Did we decide to remove them?
Even if PEP 11 defined tier-based platforms, I don't interpret them as removing all unsupported platform codes.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cygwin is certainly still alive to some extent, so I'd say let's not worry about that in the PR.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you remove cygwin branch, it will fallback to unix which is better than special casing it but it's minor and you can ignore this too.

Copy link
Member Author

@corona10 corona10 Jul 26, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you remove cygwin branch, it will fallback to unix which is better than special casing it but it's minor and you can ignore this too.

It's care about Windows/Cygwin case, see: https://docs.python.org/3/library/sys.html.
It can be gone to the wrong fallback logic.

Copy link
Member

@ericsnowcurrently ericsnowcurrently left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants