-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GH-92678: Fix tp_dictoffset inheritance. #95596
GH-92678: Fix tp_dictoffset inheritance. #95596
Conversation
…re their dictionary at the end of the struct.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can't check there aren't more edge cases, but this is an improvement, and should address the pybind11 issue.
Any ideas? I'd be very happy to add more tests |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
mostly LGTM
The new test seems fine, but I didn't look at it thoroughly. I left one comment (about a second case for weaklistoffset
) that should definitely be address one way or another.
Co-authored-by: Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently@gmail.com>
Thanks @markshannon for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11. |
Sorry, @markshannon, I could not cleanly backport this to |
* Add test for inheriting explicit __dict__ and weakref. * Restore 3.10 behavior for multiple inheritance of C extension classes that store their dictionary at the end of the struct.
I cannot review the implementation, but thanks for adding tests! #92678 looked complicated and serious. Thanks for fixing it ;-) |
Restores the 3.10 behavior for inheriting
tp_dictoffset
involving multiple inheritance of C extension classes.