Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

PEP 634: Mark as Final #3576

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2023
Merged

PEP 634: Mark as Final #3576

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2023

Conversation

hugovk
Copy link
Member

@hugovk hugovk commented Dec 10, 2023 •
edited
Loading

  • Final implementation has been merged (including tests and docs)
  • PEP matches the final implementation
  • Any substantial changes since the accepted version approved by the SC/PEP delegate
  • Pull request title in appropriate format (PEP 123: Mark Final)
  • Status changed to Final (and Python-Version is correct)
  • Canonical docs/spec linked with a canonical-doc directive (or canonical-pypa-spec, for packaging PEPs)

Helps #2872.

Link to https://docs.python.org/3/reference/compound_stmts.html#the-match-statement as the canonical docs, and remove some redundant headers.

cc @Fidget-Spinner

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--3576.org.readthedocs.build/pep-0634/

JelleZijlstra
JelleZijlstra approved these changes Dec 11, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is definitely done.

@hugovk hugovk merged commit 963f564 into python:main Dec 11, 2023
7 checks passed
@hugovk hugovk deleted the pep634-mark-as-final branch December 11, 2023 05:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra approved these changes

@brandtbucher brandtbucher Awaiting requested review from brandtbucher brandtbucher is a code owner

@gvanrossum gvanrossum Awaiting requested review from gvanrossum gvanrossum is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@hugovk @JelleZijlstra