Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Bump jsonschema to 4.19.*" #10773

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

AlexWaygood
Copy link
Member

Reverts #10583. See #10772: the PR makes types-jsonschema incompatible with Python 3.7, since types-jsonschema now depends on the referencing library, which requires Python 3.8+ (but didn't state as much in its setup.py/pyproject.toml in early versions released to PyPI).

We should be able to revert the revert once typeshed-internal/stub_uploader#103 is merged, which will allow us to properly declare that the stubs package requires Python 3.8+.

@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood requested a review from srittau September 25, 2023 15:38
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

According to mypy_primer, this change has no effect on the checked open source code. 🤖🎉

@srittau
Copy link
Collaborator

srittau commented Sep 25, 2023

I don't think this is a good idea. I'm not sure the stub uploader will handle this case gracefully.

@AlexWaygood
Copy link
Member Author

I don't think this is a good idea. I'm not sure the stub uploader will handle this case gracefully.

Ah. Well, you know better than me when it comes to that.

What will the stub-uploader do if we yank v4.19.0.0 without doing this revert? Will it simply stop pushing new versions to PyPI for the time being, or will it push v4.19.0.0 again?

@srittau
Copy link
Collaborator

srittau commented Sep 25, 2023

I'll just merge the changes to the stub uploader and kick off a new release of types-jsonschema. Then we should be safe.

@AlexWaygood
Copy link
Member Author

Okay, great!

@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood deleted the revert-10583-jsonschema-4.19 branch September 25, 2023 16:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants