Add an anti-pitch for typing #1477
Conversation
|
@pfmoore Would the existence of this document help you? I've tried to represent things as fairly as possible, but I'm in quite deep and might be biased :-) Do you have any feedback? |
hauntsaninja
force-pushed
the
anti-pitch
branch
from
8140b49 to
4ba81ec
Compare
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Overall, this seems good, and sufficiently balanced.
It still puts the onus on the library author to justify their choice to not use typing (even if it’s just to the extent of linking to this) - that’s the social side of the problem, though, and documentation won’t fix that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this makes a lot of sense. This feels a bit like the You Might Not Need Redux article by the original author of Redux. A few general notes:
- Stylistic nit: I would lose the parentheses when discussing counterpoints. These are valid arguments and not just asides.
- While it's okay for now, I think putting this document into an "FAQ" section would be a better fit than the "Guides" section.
Co-authored-by: Erik De Bonte <erikd@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com>
|
Thanks all! I think I got all the feedback; feel free to open a PR if there's something I missed :-) |
No description provided.