-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 177
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
eval script fixes #414
eval script fixes #414
Conversation
HDCharles
commented
Jun 21, 2024
•
edited
Loading
edited
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/ao/414
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No FailuresAs of commit 79b0c1d with merge base ef1e745 (): This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
Summary: int4wo had an issue with device swap after quantization int4wo-gptq had an issue with.... Test Plan: python eval.py -q int4wo-64 --compile wikitext: {'word_perplexity,none': 12.842987954345306, 'word_perplexity_stderr,none': 'N/A', 'byte_perplexity,none': 1.611855472207904, 'byte_perplexity_stderr,none': 'N/A', 'bits_per_byte,none': 0.6887223897240059, 'bits_per_byte_stderr,none': 'N/A', 'alias': 'wikitext'} python eval.py -q int4wo-64-gptq --compile Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags:
Summary: Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags:
Summary: Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags:
Summary: Test Plan: two python generate.py --checkpoint_path $CHECKPOINT_PATH/$MODEL_REPO/model.pth --compile --quantization autoquant --write_result benchmark_results.txt two python eval.py -q int4wo Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags:
98aeee5
to
79b0c1d
Compare
@@ -60,17 +60,18 @@ def run_evaluation( | |||
|
|||
if quantization: | |||
if "int8wo" in quantization: | |||
quantize(model, int8wo()) | |||
quantize(model, int8_weight_only()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
does this need to be compatible with torch 2.3 and below? if so we could define similar helpers:
ao/test/integration/test_integration.py
Lines 99 to 118 in bc8599f
def _int8wo_api(mod): | |
if TORCH_VERSION_AFTER_2_4: | |
quantize(mod, int8_weight_only()) | |
unwrap_tensor_subclass(mod) | |
else: | |
change_linear_weights_to_int8_woqtensors(mod) | |
def _int8da_int8w_api(mod): | |
if TORCH_VERSION_AFTER_2_4: | |
quantize(mod, int8_dynamic_activation_int8_weight()) | |
unwrap_tensor_subclass(mod) | |
else: | |
change_linear_weights_to_int8_dqtensors(mod) | |
def _int4wo_api(mod): | |
if TORCH_VERSION_AFTER_2_4: | |
quantize(mod, int4_weight_only()) | |
unwrap_tensor_subclass(mod) | |
else: | |
change_linear_weights_to_int4_woqtensors(mod) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think its mostly for our own testing, not sure if that's needed
@@ -189,21 +189,21 @@ def main( | |||
if quantization: | |||
from torchao.quantization.quant_api import ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we dedup the quant code in eval and generate.py?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
only a bit, its probably more trouble that its worth given the differences and needing to handle autoquant vs gptq ...etc
if "int4wo" in quantization: | ||
groupsize=int(quantization.split("-")[-1]) | ||
assert groupsize in [32,64,128,256], f"int4wo groupsize needs to be one of [32,64,128,256] but got {groupsize}" | ||
quantize(model, int4wo(groupsize=groupsize)) | ||
quantize(model, int4_weight_only(groupsize=groupsize)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is group_size
since last update I think
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cc @HDCharles
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i'll fix it in another PR
Additional script fixes Summary: int4wo had an issue with device swap after quantization api (need to set device before quantize) int4wo-gptq had an issue with kv_cache model var not being set correctly (now set in GPTQ code) eval in general had an issue with lm_eval 0.4.2 (updates to tokenizer and eval harness) pytorch#404 [not eval] autoquant docs not showing up (added __all__ to autoquant), made autoquant low level apis priviate Test Plan: python eval.py -q int4wo-64 --compile wikitext: {'word_perplexity,none': 12.842987954345306, 'word_perplexity_stderr,none': 'N/A', 'byte _perplexity,none': 1.611855472207904, 'byte_perplexity_stderr,none': 'N/A', 'bits_per_byte,none': 0.68 87223897240059, 'bits_per_byte_stderr,none': 'N/A', 'alias': 'wikitext'} Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: