Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FSDP] Fix bug in determining whether parameters need to be materialized #97488

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jamesr66a
Copy link
Collaborator

Previously, _need_to_materialize_module would return false because:

  • managed_params =_get_orig_params(module, ignored_params) returns a generator
  • is_meta_module = any(param.is_meta for param in managed_params) exhausts the generator in its check
  • any(fake.is_fake(param) for param in managed_params) would try to iterate over the empty generator and get an empty sequence, thus returning False

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Mar 23, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/97488

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 723f8b9:
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the release notes: distributed (fsdp) release notes category label Mar 23, 2023
@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Mar 23, 2023

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: jamesr66a / name: James Reed (723f8b9)

@ngimel
Copy link
Collaborator

ngimel commented Mar 24, 2023

Test?

Copy link
Contributor

@awgu awgu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great catch! Thanks!

@jamesr66a
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Mar 25, 2023
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the fix_materialize_check branch September 23, 2024 02:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged open source release notes: distributed (fsdp) release notes category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants