Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Openvino integration into torchserve #3116

Merged
merged 26 commits into from
May 6, 2024

Conversation

suryasidd
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR adds initial support for integrating OpenVINO backend for torch.compile into torchserve. With this change users will be able to serve their pytorch models on torchserve and accelerate them using OpenVINO on Intel hardware.

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • This change requires a documentation update

Checklist:

  • Did you have fun?
  • Have you added tests that prove your fix is effective or that this feature works?
  • Has code been commented, particularly in hard-to-understand areas?
  • Have you made corresponding changes to the documentation?

setup.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Collaborator

@agunapal agunapal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@agunapal agunapal enabled auto-merge May 2, 2024 23:07
auto-merge was automatically disabled May 3, 2024 18:24

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

@agunapal agunapal enabled auto-merge May 3, 2024 23:02
@agunapal agunapal added this pull request to the merge queue May 6, 2024
Merged via the queue into pytorch:master with commit 6407c93 May 6, 2024
8 of 12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants