Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resnet152 batch inference torch.compile example #3259

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 19, 2024

Conversation

andrius-meta
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Adding an example for TorchServe to use torch.compile for a batch Resnet152 model, similar to what already exists for densenet161.

Type of change

  • The documentation of batched Resnet152 was updated.

Feature/Issue validation/testing

I executed the instructions that are added with this pull request.

Checklist:

  • Did you have fun?
  • Have you added tests that prove your fix is effective or that this feature works?
  • Has code been commented, particularly in hard-to-understand areas?
  • Have you made corresponding changes to the documentation?

batch `Resnet152` model, similar to what already exists for `densenet161`.

- The documentation of batched `Resnet152` was updated.

- [x] Did you have fun?
- [ ] Have you added tests that prove your fix is effective or that this feature works?
- [ ] Has code been commented, particularly in hard-to-understand areas?
- [x] Have you made corresponding changes to the documentation?
Copy link
Collaborator

@agunapal agunapal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thank you for your contribution!

@agunapal agunapal enabled auto-merge July 19, 2024 17:35
@agunapal agunapal added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 19, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit c8b96b4 Jul 19, 2024
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants