Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add comments for the modified implementation of ResNet #1983

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 16, 2020
Merged

add comments for the modified implementation of ResNet #1983

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 16, 2020

Conversation

Dirtybluer
Copy link
Contributor

In reference to #191 added comments to clarify the differences between torchvision's implementation of ResNet and the one in original paper.

Not sure if it's the proper place to insert such comments and if I have explained the situation clear enough.

Please let me know if further modifications are needed. @fmassa

Copy link
Member

@fmassa fmassa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@fmassa fmassa merged commit 7c077f6 into pytorch:master Mar 16, 2020
fmassa pushed a commit to fmassa/vision-1 that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2020
Co-authored-by: Charles Pao <dirtybluer@gmail.com>
facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2020
Summary:

Pull Request resolved: #2424

Reviewed By: zhangguanheng66

Differential Revision: D22432635

Pulled By: fmassa

fbshipit-source-id: 16fa637f14c4bac61f3705ec2c742a0d9e713596

Co-authored-by: Charles Pao <dirtybluer@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants