Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add torchscript test for decode_gif #8418

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 10, 2024

Conversation

NicolasHug
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented May 9, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/vision/8418

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 16 New Failures, 21 Unrelated Failures

As of commit f0ab354 with merge base 17d972a (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

FLAKY - The following jobs failed but were likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

Copy link
Collaborator

@pmeier pmeier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Stamp

@NicolasHug NicolasHug merged commit c9eab68 into pytorch:main May 10, 2024
9 of 33 checks passed
@NicolasHug NicolasHug deleted the test_gif_script branch May 10, 2024 08:33
Copy link

Hey @NicolasHug!

You merged this PR, but no labels were added.
The list of valid labels is available at https://github.com/pytorch/vision/blob/main/.github/process_commit.py

facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2024
Reviewed By: vmoens

Differential Revision: D57565245

fbshipit-source-id: 4e3fba36563c5a95b8e8d67a2d17a17324391484
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants