Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add docs for eager mode #7700

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 17, 2024
Merged

Add docs for eager mode #7700

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 17, 2024

Conversation

JackCaoG
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

docs/eager.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/eager.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/eager.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/eager.md Outdated
optimizer.step()
return loss

self.compiled_step_fn = torch_xla.experimental.compile(self.step_fn)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

re: naming, I don't think compiled_step_fn makes sense here. It makes it look like this function is imperatively compiled when you call compile, when what's really happening is that you will trace and JIT-compile the function when it's called later. jit and trace already mean something else in this ecosystem though...

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

well that's the trade of I made when I try to align the api with the upstream, I think it creates more confusion to called it jited_step_fn. I will just rename it to step_fn

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you want to just use compile as a decorator here if you're following the upstream convention?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

seem like upstream support both, I can support both too https://pytorch.org/tutorials/intermediate/torch_compile_tutorial.html

@JackCaoG JackCaoG requested a review from will-cromar July 17, 2024 22:51
@JackCaoG JackCaoG marked this pull request as ready for review July 17, 2024 23:33
@JackCaoG JackCaoG merged commit ea1a1f4 into master Jul 17, 2024
23 checks passed
JackCaoG added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2024
bhavya01 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants