Feature/add http basic support auth

[johnnybutler7]

#129

[q9f]

Thank you! My only concern is that it duplicates some code from the HTTP client. What about adding a conditional check for user and password to the HTTP client?

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #151 (81b1d66) into main (7926fc4) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #151      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.74%   99.72%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          67       68       +1     
  Lines        3923     3968      +45     
==========================================
+ Hits         3913     3957      +44     
- Misses         10       11       +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
lib/eth/client.rb	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
lib/eth/client/http_basic.rb	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
spec/eth/client_spec.rb	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
lib/eth/client/ipc.rb	93.33% <0.00%> (-6.67%)	⬇️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[johnnybutler7]

Thank you! My only concern is that it duplicates some code from the HTTP client. What about adding a conditional check for user and password to the HTTP client?

Thanks for your reply. Initially I started off with the approach but the code became a bit ugly. Generally I find creating a whole new thing is a better trade off in this situation even if it duplicates some code. They don't share all the same attributes(user, password) so its different enough from Client::Http to warrant a dedicated class of its own Client::HttpBasic

Could potentially create a subclass of Client::HttpBasic with the different functionality but that's a bit overkill for this.