Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

qw5q_platinum using QM OPX1000 #179

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024
Merged

qw5q_platinum using QM OPX1000 #179

merged 11 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024

Conversation

stavros11
Copy link
Member

Needs qiboteam/qibolab#1045 to work.

I will add some reports once I manage to calibrate in a bit more detail.

@alecandido alecandido changed the base branch from main to 0.1 October 2, 2024 12:07
@stavros11
Copy link
Member Author

After the fix introduced in qiboteam/qibolab@55993b3, I was finally able to see Rabi oscillations on qubits 0, 2, 3, 4 with normal amplitudes/durations:

Readout fidelities are worse than before, I am not sure if they can be improved. Qubit 1 was set at anti-sweetspot so I didn't try to calibrate it. It may be possible to operate it there, or maybe even try putting it back at the sweetspot if it is not affecting other qubits.

@stavros11
Copy link
Member Author

Marking this as ready for review, since the platform is working, even if it is not the best calibration. I would still wait for qiboteam/qibolab#1045 to be merged before merging this though, so that the workflow passes.

@stavros11 stavros11 marked this pull request as ready for review October 17, 2024 16:00
@stavros11 stavros11 requested review from alecandido and hay-k October 17, 2024 16:00
@alecandido alecandido merged commit e035cf8 into 0.1 Oct 22, 2024
1 of 3 checks passed
@alecandido alecandido deleted the qw5q-qm branch October 22, 2024 06:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants