Reorganize package and content v2

[alecandido]

• provide testing workflow
• adjust pylint and pytest basic configs
• drop unused deps
• split tests
• fix numba missing threads
  • this now has a dedicated issue, and won't be addressed here Invalid NUMBA_NUM_THREADS while running with Numpy qibojit#107

[alecandido]

@nitinshivaraman I'm adding you as a reviewer to make you aware of updates, but I will explicitly notify (at this point by removing draft mode, but also tagging you) when I'll be ready to merge.

P.S.: in particular not before workflows will be passing

[alecandido]

@scarrazza can you provide a CODECOV_TOKEN in secrets? It is required by the shared workflow, but of course not available in this repo.

[alecandido]

Workflows are now waiting on CODECOV_TOKEN, but they might be alright.

As soon as we get back the green tick, we can just merge and continue the review in #8

[scarrazza]

@scarrazza can you provide a CODECOV_TOKEN in secrets? It is required by the shared workflow, but of course not available in this repo.

Done, please go ahead, thanks.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (qasm_with_quimb_backend@625e3ec). Click here to learn what that means.
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                    Coverage Diff                     @@
##             qasm_with_quimb_backend      #10   +/-   ##
==========================================================
  Coverage                           ?   37.91%           
==========================================================
  Files                              ?        3           
  Lines                              ?      182           
  Branches                           ?        0           
==========================================================
  Hits                               ?       69           
  Misses                             ?      113           
  Partials                           ?        0           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	37.91% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[alecandido]

The author of this PR, AleCandido, is not an activated member of this organization on Codecov. Please activate this user on Codecov to display this PR comment. Coverage data is still being uploaded to Codecov.io for purposes of overall coverage calculations. Please don't hesitate to email us at support@codecov.io with any questions.

@scarrazza (it is just a single button, you get there through the link)

[alecandido]

@nitinshivaraman now that tests are passing, you can merge whenever you're happy with the content :)

[scarrazza]

Please retry now (we have already 5/5 seats in codecov filled).

[alecandido]

Please retry now (we have already 5/5 seats in codecov filled).

I was actually not aware of this limitation...

EDIT: I saw it on the page, it should be lifted by making more used repos public, so we usually don't hit this constraint...

[scarrazza]

EDIT: I saw it on the page, it should be lifted by making more used repos public, so we usually don't hit this constraint...

Exactly

[nitinshivaraman]

@nitinshivaraman now that tests are passing, you can merge whenever you're happy with the content :)

Thanks a lot @alecandido! I will proceed to merge it :)