-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adds Planck Rev 7 #21156
Adds Planck Rev 7 #21156
Conversation
keyboards/planck/rev7/matrix.c
Outdated
* along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. | ||
*/ | ||
|
||
#include "config.h" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
shouldn't need. And should be converted to matrix lite.
#include "config.h" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can convert this & rev6_drop's matrix to lite separately.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can convert this & rev6_drop's matrix to lite separately.
"separately" as in not as part of this PR? If so, we would usually block merge on such a decision.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Separately in another PR, because I don't want to update rev6_drop here and would rather have their implementations match for the time being.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree rev6_drop
should not be changed as part of this PR. However the matrix code is not the same, so it being aligned is already false. Its called out in the PR checklist, and has been requested/required on many previous PRs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It should be the same matrix code aside from the encoder matrix additions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Co-authored-by: Drashna Jaelre <drashna@live.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Custom matrix should be implemented as "lite" per PR checklist
Closed in favor of #21175 |
Types of Changes
Checklist