Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(release): release v0.1.0 #12

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 3, 2019
Merged

chore(release): release v0.1.0 #12

merged 6 commits into from
Jun 3, 2019

Conversation

b5
Copy link
Member

@b5 b5 commented May 27, 2019

@ramfox this PR should be a nice template for doing the gx'd packages in qri-io/qri#726, with one exception: I'm avoiding cutting a release in this PR b/c I'd like to land some refactoring first (PR's on that to follow).

gx-go has a command for removing gx-paths. navigate to a directory with a gx package.json & run:

$ gx-go uw

which will "unrewrite" all of the deps back to regs imports

I ended up using go-ipfs 0.4.21-rc3 as the target version for this refactoring. When doing the conversion I pulled dep versions from the 0.4.21-rc3 go.mod file. I'm delighted by just how simple it was to switch out deps.

b5 added 4 commits May 27, 2019 08:29
prep for switch to go modules, removing gx paths in favour of their URL counterparts
IPFS crew is hard at work converting from base64 to base32 so hashes will work in urls.
This updates our tests to reflect ipld spitting out base32 cids now
@b5 b5 requested a review from ramfox May 27, 2019 18:43
@b5 b5 self-assigned this May 27, 2019
Copy link
Member

@ramfox ramfox left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lovely LGTM

@ramfox
Copy link
Member

ramfox commented May 30, 2019

this part of the qri-io/qri#726 mission

@b5 b5 changed the title refactor: switch to go modules chore(release): release v0.1.0 Jun 3, 2019
@b5 b5 merged commit e5b4cad into master Jun 3, 2019
@b5 b5 deleted the refactor branch June 3, 2019 13:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants