-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update parallel XEB notebook #6494
update parallel XEB notebook #6494
Conversation
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
@eliottrosenberg I don't know if this is enough or not. how do you think we should modify the notebooks? |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #6494 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 97.75% 97.76%
=======================================
Files 1105 1105
Lines 95030 95030
=======================================
+ Hits 92898 92902 +4
+ Misses 2132 2128 -4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
I think this is basically sufficient. I added a few small suggestions. |
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ | |||
" import cirq\n", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you think that it's worth commenting that the default entangling gate in parallel_two_qubit_xeb
is CZ even though this example uses sqrt_iswap?
Reply via ReviewNB
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
added
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One small comment/question. Otherwise LGTM.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor changes for usability, otherwise LGTM.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
No description provided.