Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can we make it() available globally? #1587

Closed
hadley opened this issue Mar 9, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1763
Closed

Can we make it() available globally? #1587

hadley opened this issue Mar 9, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1763
Labels
BDD 🧑‍🏫 feature a feature request or enhancement
Milestone

Comments

@hadley
Copy link
Member

hadley commented Mar 9, 2022

So you can run interactively more easily

@hadley hadley added feature a feature request or enhancement tests 📘 labels Sep 19, 2022
@hadley hadley added this to the 3.1.8 milestone Mar 23, 2023
hadley added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 29, 2023
* Export `it()` to make interactive testing easier. Fixes #1587.
* Call `use_test_context()` in `it()`. Fixes #1731

Adds rlang helpers which need a hack because of the old `is_null()` expectation.
hadley added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 31, 2023
* Export `it()` to make interactive testing easier. Fixes #1587.
* Call `use_test_context()` in `it()`. Fixes #1731

Adds rlang helpers which need a hack because of the old `is_null()` expectation.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
BDD 🧑‍🏫 feature a feature request or enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant