Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix issue #905 - The matching network tool gives incorrect results when conditionally stable data is provided #907

Merged

Conversation

andresmmera
Copy link
Contributor

As reported in issue #905, the matching network tool gave incorrect results when using a conditionally stable S-matrix.To obtain a conjugate match at both ports, the device must satisfy the unconditional stability criteria, defined as K > 1 and abs(delta) < 1. See [1].

A condition has been added here. It checks the stability and stops the execution if the criteria is not met.

Tests

1) Conditionally stable device (#905)

Using the S-parameter data provided in #905, a message is now displayed warning of conditional stability and advising the user to consider adding losses and/or FB.

Selection_019
Selection_020

2) Unconditionally stable device.

The device in 1) is stabilized with 12 Ohm at the input. This makes it unconditionally stable (K = 1.06 < 1, |delta| = 0.228 < 1)
Selection_021

The tool is used to synthesise the input and output matching networks. It works as usual: Note that S11 and S22 are matched to 50 ohms at the given frequency (400 MHz).

Selection_022
Selection_023

Thank you @tomhajjar

[1] Microwave Engineering. David M Pozar. 2012. Eqs 12.28 and 12.29

As reported in issue ra3xdh#905, the matching network tool gave wrong results when using a conditionally stable S-matrix. In order to have a conjugately match, the device is required to meet the unconditional stability criteria defined in [1] as K > 1 and abs(delta) < 1

A condition was added in the program to filter out these cases and warn the user against this limitation.

[1] Microwave Engineering. David M Pozar. 2012. Eqs 12.28 and 12.29
@ra3xdh ra3xdh linked an issue Aug 24, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@ra3xdh ra3xdh merged commit f07de2e into ra3xdh:current Aug 24, 2024
7 checks passed
@ra3xdh
Copy link
Owner

ra3xdh commented Aug 24, 2024

Tanks for the contribution! Merged.

@andresmmera andresmmera deleted the Fix_Issue_905_Matching_Tool_K_less_1 branch August 24, 2024 16:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Matching Circuit Tool generates wrong results
2 participants