This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 11, 2019. It is now read-only.
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
mm: mempolicy: handle vma with unmovable pages mapped correctly in mbind
When running syzkaller internally, we ran into the below bug on 4.9.x kernel: kernel BUG at mm/huge_memory.c:2124! invalid opcode: 0000 [GrapheneOS#1] SMP KASAN CPU: 0 PID: 1518 Comm: syz-executor107 Not tainted 4.9.168+ GrapheneOS#2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 0.5.1 01/01/2011 task: ffff880067b34900 task.stack: ffff880068998000 RIP: split_huge_page_to_list+0x8fb/0x1030 mm/huge_memory.c:2124 Call Trace: split_huge_page include/linux/huge_mm.h:100 [inline] queue_pages_pte_range+0x7e1/0x1480 mm/mempolicy.c:538 walk_pmd_range mm/pagewalk.c:50 [inline] walk_pud_range mm/pagewalk.c:90 [inline] walk_pgd_range mm/pagewalk.c:116 [inline] __walk_page_range+0x44a/0xdb0 mm/pagewalk.c:208 walk_page_range+0x154/0x370 mm/pagewalk.c:285 queue_pages_range+0x115/0x150 mm/mempolicy.c:694 do_mbind mm/mempolicy.c:1241 [inline] SYSC_mbind+0x3c3/0x1030 mm/mempolicy.c:1370 SyS_mbind+0x46/0x60 mm/mempolicy.c:1352 do_syscall_64+0x1d2/0x600 arch/x86/entry/common.c:282 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x5d/0xdb Code: c7 80 1c 02 00 e8 26 0a 76 01 <0f> 0b 48 c7 c7 40 46 45 84 e8 4c RIP [<ffffffff81895d6b>] split_huge_page_to_list+0x8fb/0x1030 mm/huge_memory.c:2124 RSP <ffff88006899f980> with the below test: uint64_t r[1] = {0xffffffffffffffff}; int main(void) { syscall(__NR_mmap, 0x20000000, 0x1000000, 3, 0x32, -1, 0); intptr_t res = 0; res = syscall(__NR_socket, 0x11, 3, 0x300); if (res != -1) r[0] = res; *(uint32_t*)0x20000040 = 0x10000; *(uint32_t*)0x20000044 = 1; *(uint32_t*)0x20000048 = 0xc520; *(uint32_t*)0x2000004c = 1; syscall(__NR_setsockopt, r[0], 0x107, 0xd, 0x20000040, 0x10); syscall(__NR_mmap, 0x20fed000, 0x10000, 0, 0x8811, r[0], 0); *(uint64_t*)0x20000340 = 2; syscall(__NR_mbind, 0x20ff9000, 0x4000, 0x4002, 0x20000340, 0x45d4, 3); return 0; } Actually the test does: mmap(0x20000000, 16777216, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x20000000 socket(AF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, 768) = 3 setsockopt(3, SOL_PACKET, PACKET_TX_RING, {block_size=65536, block_nr=1, frame_size=50464, frame_nr=1}, 16) = 0 mmap(0x20fed000, 65536, PROT_NONE, MAP_SHARED|MAP_FIXED|MAP_POPULATE|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0) = 0x20fed000 mbind(..., MPOL_MF_STRICT|MPOL_MF_MOVE) = 0 The setsockopt() would allocate compound pages (16 pages in this test) for packet tx ring, then the mmap() would call packet_mmap() to map the pages into the user address space specified by the mmap() call. When calling mbind(), it would scan the vma to queue the pages for migration to the new node. It would split any huge page since 4.9 doesn't support THP migration, however, the packet tx ring compound pages are not THP and even not movable. So, the above bug is triggered. However, the later kernel is not hit by this issue due to commit d44d363 ("mm: don't assume anonymous pages have SwapBacked flag"), which just removes the PageSwapBacked check for a different reason. But, there is a deeper issue. According to the semantic of mbind(), it should return -EIO if MPOL_MF_MOVE or MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL was specified and MPOL_MF_STRICT was also specified, but the kernel was unable to move all existing pages in the range. The tx ring of the packet socket is definitely not movable, however, mbind() returns success for this case. Although the most socket file associates with non-movable pages, but XDP may have movable pages from gup. So, it sounds not fine to just check the underlying file type of vma in vma_migratable(). Change migrate_page_add() to check if the page is movable or not, if it is unmovable, just return -EIO. But do not abort pte walk immediately, since there may be pages off LRU temporarily. We should migrate other pages if MPOL_MF_MOVE* is specified. Set has_unmovable flag if some paged could not be not moved, then return -EIO for mbind() eventually. With this change the above test would return -EIO as expected. [yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com: fix review comments from Vlastimil] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1563556862-54056-3-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1561162809-59140-3-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Loading branch information