Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🔍 Parse search queries without asset checking #468

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 30, 2021
Merged

Conversation

rowanseymour
Copy link
Contributor

Update to latest goflow and add parse_only as param to parse_query to allow us to extract field dependencies even when they don't yet exist in the database

… allow us to extract field dependencies even when they don't yet exist in the database
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 29, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #468 (4071ce0) into main (a9293b9) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 85.71%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #468      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   56.99%   56.97%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         123      123              
  Lines        8598     8591       -7     
==========================================
- Hits         4900     4895       -5     
+ Misses       2921     2920       -1     
+ Partials      777      776       -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
web/contact/search.go 82.08% <84.61%> (-1.25%) ⬇️
core/models/contacts.go 62.83% <100.00%> (+0.22%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a9293b9...4071ce0. Read the comment docs.

@rowanseymour rowanseymour merged commit 2b9bd2a into main Jul 30, 2021
@rowanseymour rowanseymour deleted the parse_only branch July 30, 2021 21:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant