Skip to content

release_notes_v21.12.01

Gigon Bae edited this page Dec 23, 2021 · 4 revisions

Version 21.12.01 (Dec 23, 2021)

This version would be only available through the PyPI package (https://pypi.org/project/cucim/21.12.1/).

🚀 New Features

  1. Supporting Multithreading and Batch Processing (#149) @gigony

Supporting Multithreading and Batch Processing

cuCIM now supports loading the entire image with multi-threads. It also supports batch loading of images.

If device parameter of read_region() method is "cuda", it loads a relevant portion of the image file (compressed tile data) into GPU memory using cuFile(GDS, GPUDirect Storage), then decompress those data using nvJPEG's Batched Image Decoding API.

Current implementations are not efficient and performance is poor compared to CPU implementations. However, we plan to improve it over the next versions.

Example API Usages

The following parameters would be added in the read_region method:

  • num_workers: number of workers(threads) to use for loading the image. (default: 1)
  • batch_size: number of images to load at once. (default: 1)
  • drop_last: whether to drop the last batch if the batch size is not divisible by the number of images. (default: False)
  • preferch_factor: number of samples loaded in advance by each worker. (default: 2)
  • shuffle: whether to shuffle the input locations (default: False)
  • seed: seed value for random value generation (default: 0)

Loading entire image by using multithreads

from cucim import CuImage

img = CuImage("input.tif")

region = img.read_region(level=1, num_workers=8)  # read whole image at level 1 using 8 workers

Loading batched image using multithreads

You can feed locations of the region through the list/tuple of locations or through the NumPy array of locations. (e.g., ((<x for loc 1>, <y for loc 1>), (<x for loc 2>, <y for loc 2>)])). Each element in the location should be int type (int64) and the dimension of the location should be equal to the dimension of the size. You can feed any iterator of locations (dimensions of the input don't matter, flattening the item in the iterator once if the item is also an iterator).

For example, you can feed the following iterator:

  • [0, 0, 100, 0] or (0, 0, 100, 0) would be interpreted as a list of (0, 0) and (100, 0).
  • ((sx, sy) for sy in range(0, height, patch_size) for sx in range(0, width, patch_size)) would iterate over the locations of the patches.
  • [(0, 100), (0, 200)] would be interpreted as a list of (0, 0) and (100, 0).
  • Numpy array such as np.array(((0, 100), (0, 200))) or np.array((0, 100, 0, 200)) would be also available and using Numpy array object would be faster than using python list/tuple.
import numpy as np
from cucim import CuImage

cache = CuImage.cache("per_process", memory_capacity=1024)

img = CuImage("image.tif")

locations = [[0,   0], [100,   0], [200,   0], [300,   0],
             [0, 200], [100, 200], [200, 200], [300, 200]]
# locations = np.array(locations)

region = img.read_region(locations, (224, 224), batch_size=4, num_workers=8)

for batch in region:
    img = np.asarray(batch)
    print(img.shape)
    for item in img:
        print(item.shape)

# (4, 224, 224, 3)
# (224, 224, 3)
# (224, 224, 3)
# (224, 224, 3)
# (224, 224, 3)
# (4, 224, 224, 3)
# (224, 224, 3)
# (224, 224, 3)
# (224, 224, 3)
# (224, 224, 3)

Loading image using nvJPEG and cuFile (GDS, GPUDirect Storage)

If cuda argument is specified in device parameter of read_region() method, it uses nvJPEG with GPUDirect Storage to load images.

Use CuPy instead of Numpy, and Image Cache (CuImage.cache) wouldn't be used in the case.

import cupy as cp
from cucim import CuImage

img = CuImage("image.tif")

locations = [[0,   0], [100,   0], [200,   0], [300,   0],
             [0, 200], [100, 200], [200, 200], [300, 200]]
# locations = np.array(locations)

region = img.read_region(locations, (224, 224), batch_size=4, device="cuda")

for batch in region:
    img = cp.asarray(batch)
    print(img.shape)
    for item in img:
        print(item.shape)

# (4, 224, 224, 3)
# (224, 224, 3)
# (224, 224, 3)
# (224, 224, 3)
# (224, 224, 3)
# (4, 224, 224, 3)
# (224, 224, 3)
# (224, 224, 3)
# (224, 224, 3)
# (224, 224, 3)

Experimental Results

We have compared performance against Tifffile for loading the entire image.

System Information
Experiment Setup

Benchmarked loading several images with Tifffile.

Results
  • JPEG2000 YCbCr: TUPAC-TR-467.svs, 55MB, 19920x26420, tile size 240x240
    • cuCIM [6 threads]: 2.7688472287729384
    • tifffile [6 threads]: 7.4588409311138095
    • cuCIM [12 threads]: 2.1468488964252175
    • tifffile [12 threads]: 6.142562598735094
  • JPEG: image.tif (256x256 multi-resolution/tiled TIF conversion of TUPAC-TR-467.svs), 238MB, 19920x26420, tile size 256x256
    • cuCIM [6 threads]: 0.6951584462076426
    • tifffile [6 threads]: 1.0252630705013872
    • cuCIM [12 threads]: 0.5354489935562015
    • tifffile [12 threads]: 1.5688881931826473
  • JPEG2000 RGB: CMU-1-JP2K-33005.svs, 126MB, 46000x32893, tile size 240x240
    • cuCIM [6 threads]: 9.2361351958476
    • tifffile [6 threads]: 27.936951795965435
    • cuCIM [12 threads]: 7.4136177686043085
    • tifffile [12 threads]: 22.46532293939963
  • JPEG: 0005f7aaab2800f6170c399693a96917.tiff, 46MB, 27648x29440, tile size 512x512
    • cuCIM [6 threads]: 0.7972335423342883
    • tifffile [6 threads]: 0.926042037177831
    • cuCIM [12 threads]: 0.6366931471042335
    • tifffile [12 threads]: 0.9512427857145667
  • JPEG: 000920ad0b612851f8e01bcc880d9b3d.tiff, 14MB, 15360x13312, tile size 512x512
    • cuCIM [6 threads]: 0.2257618647068739
    • tifffile [6 threads]: 0.25579613661393524
    • cuCIM [12 threads]: 0.1840262952260673
    • tifffile [12 threads]: 0.2717844221740961
  • JPEG: 001d865e65ef5d2579c190a0e0350d8f.tiff, 71MB, 28672x34560, tile size 512x512
    • cuCIM [6 threads]: 0.9925791253335774
    • tifffile [6 threads]: 1.131185239739716
    • cuCIM [12 threads]: 0.8037087645381689
    • tifffile [12 threads]: 1.1474561678245663