Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fea cleanup stream part1 #1653

Merged

Conversation

ChuckHastings
Copy link
Collaborator

Addresses part of #1538 and #1422

Breaking the work for these issues into smaller chunks to make it easier to test, review and approve.

@ChuckHastings ChuckHastings requested a review from a team as a code owner June 7, 2021 21:35
@ChuckHastings ChuckHastings self-assigned this Jun 7, 2021
@ChuckHastings ChuckHastings added this to the 21.08 milestone Jun 7, 2021
@ChuckHastings ChuckHastings added the feature request New feature or request label Jun 7, 2021
@ChuckHastings ChuckHastings added the non-breaking Non-breaking change label Jun 7, 2021
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 8, 2021

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (branch-21.08@6aab21f). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##             branch-21.08   #1653   +/-   ##
==============================================
  Coverage                ?   0.22%           
==============================================
  Files                   ?      80           
  Lines                   ?    3542           
  Branches                ?       0           
==============================================
  Hits                    ?       8           
  Misses                  ?    3534           
  Partials                ?       0           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6aab21f...ac1b42b. Read the comment docs.

@seunghwak
Copy link
Contributor

Is this PR pretty much complete (and just waiting for CI issues to be resolved) or you have more works to do?

I am worried that I will see a crazy number of merge conflicts if I try to merge my DCSR PR with this PR (both will touch many files in common).

If this PR is nearly complete, I can pull this to my PR first to avoid resolving merge conflicts later.

@ChuckHastings
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I was going to do no more in this PR unless there were some review comments. There's a bunch more files to do this with, but I was going to do them all in batches like this.

Just waiting for the CI issues to be resolved to request reviews.

Copy link
Contributor

@seunghwak seunghwak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not something critical, but we may need to review whether should we pass a cuda_stream_view object by value or const reference.

Besides that, looks good to me.

@@ -27,10 +27,11 @@ class Dendrogram {
public:
void add_level(vertex_t first_index,
vertex_t num_verts,
cudaStream_t stream,
rmm::cuda_stream_view const &stream_view,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pushed the change to pass by value.

@BradReesWork
Copy link
Member

@gpucibot merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit 27444ed into rapidsai:branch-21.08 Jun 15, 2021
@ChuckHastings ChuckHastings deleted the fea_cleanup_stream_part1 branch July 29, 2021 15:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request New feature or request non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants