Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MGPropertyGraph: fix OOM when renumbering by type #3123

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 19, 2023

Conversation

eriknw
Copy link
Contributor

@eriknw eriknw commented Jan 10, 2023

Fixes #3110

Previously, all data for a single type would be collected in a single partition, which could easily overwhelm a worker or GPU.

We now sort by multiple columns to ensure data can be evenly distributed.

Fixes rapidsai#3110

Previously, all data for a single type would be collected in a single partition,
which could easily overwhelm a worker or GPU.

We now sort by multiple columns to ensure data can be evenly distributed.
@eriknw eriknw requested a review from a team as a code owner January 10, 2023 04:20
@BradReesWork BradReesWork added improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Jan 10, 2023
@BradReesWork BradReesWork added this to the 23.02 milestone Jan 10, 2023
Copy link
Member

@alexbarghi-nv alexbarghi-nv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@alexbarghi-nv
Copy link
Member

Looks good; was just wondering what the impact on runtime would be.

Copy link
Member

@VibhuJawa VibhuJawa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@alexbarghi-nv
Copy link
Member

/merge

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 19, 2023

Codecov Report

Base: 55.31% // Head: 55.20% // Decreases project coverage by -0.11% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (6eb3d40) compared to base (ea132d3).
Patch coverage: 0.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           branch-23.02    #3123      +/-   ##
================================================
- Coverage         55.31%   55.20%   -0.11%     
================================================
  Files               148      142       -6     
  Lines              9423     9229     -194     
================================================
- Hits               5212     5095     -117     
+ Misses             4211     4134      -77     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...ugraph/cugraph/dask/structure/mg_property_graph.py 11.68% <0.00%> (ø)
python/pylibcugraph/pylibcugraph/testing/utils.py
...thon/pylibcugraph/pylibcugraph/testing/__init__.py
...n/pylibcugraph/pylibcugraph/utilities/api_tools.py
python/pylibcugraph/pylibcugraph/__init__.py
python/pylibcugraph/pylibcugraph/_version.py
...pylibcugraph/pylibcugraph/experimental/__init__.py

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit f8f075f into rapidsai:branch-23.02 Jan 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG]: MGPropertyGraph renumber by type OOM
6 participants