Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[air/docs] Remove experimental features page, add github issue instead #36950

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 30, 2023

Conversation

krfricke
Copy link
Contributor

Why are these changes needed?

Instead of tracking the experimental features in the docs, we will track them in this pinned issue instead: #36949

Related issue number

Checks

  • I've signed off every commit(by using the -s flag, i.e., git commit -s) in this PR.
  • I've run scripts/format.sh to lint the changes in this PR.
  • I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/.
    • I've added any new APIs to the API Reference. For example, if I added a
      method in Tune, I've added it in doc/source/tune/api/ under the
      corresponding .rst file.
  • I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Release tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

Signed-off-by: Kai Fricke <kai@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kai Fricke <kai@anyscale.com>
@krfricke krfricke merged commit 3e4450a into ray-project:master Jun 30, 2023
@krfricke krfricke deleted the doc/air/remove-experimental branch June 30, 2023 11:43
arvind-chandra pushed a commit to lmco/ray that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2023
ray-project#36950)

Instead of tracking the experimental features in the docs, we will track them in this pinned issue instead: ray-project#36949

Signed-off-by: Kai Fricke <kai@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: e428265 <arvind.chandramouli@lmco.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants