Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Data] Add partitioning parameter to read_parquet #47553

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 16, 2024

Conversation

bveeramani
Copy link
Member

@bveeramani bveeramani commented Sep 7, 2024

Why are these changes needed?

To extract path partition information with read_parquet, you pass a PyArrow partitioning object to dataset_kwargs. For example:

schema = pa.schema([("one", pa.int32()), ("two", pa.string())])
partitioning = pa.dataset.partitioning(schema, flavor="hive")
ds = ray.data.read_parquet(... dataset_kwargs=dict(partitioning=partitioning))

This is problematic for two reasons:

  1. It tightly couples the interface with the implementation; partitioning only works if we use pyarrow.Dataset in a specific way in the implementation.
  2. It's inconsistent with all of the other file-based API. All other APIs use expose a top-level partitioning parameter (rather than dataset_kwargs) where you pass a Ray Data Partitioning object (rather than a PyArrow partitioning object).

Related issue number

Checks

  • I've signed off every commit(by using the -s flag, i.e., git commit -s) in this PR.
  • I've run scripts/format.sh to lint the changes in this PR.
  • I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/.
    • I've added any new APIs to the API Reference. For example, if I added a
      method in Tune, I've added it in doc/source/tune/api/ under the
      corresponding .rst file.
  • I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Release tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <bveeramani@berkeley.edu>
Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <bveeramani@berkeley.edu>
Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <bveeramani@berkeley.edu>
Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <bveeramani@berkeley.edu>
Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <bveeramani@berkeley.edu>
@bveeramani bveeramani enabled auto-merge (squash) September 14, 2024 04:39
@github-actions github-actions bot added the go add ONLY when ready to merge, run all tests label Sep 14, 2024
@bveeramani bveeramani merged commit 1c80db5 into master Sep 16, 2024
7 checks passed
@bveeramani bveeramani deleted the parquet-partitioning-arg branch September 16, 2024 05:15
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
)

To extract path partition information with `read_parquet`, you pass a
PyArrow `partitioning` object to `dataset_kwargs`. For example:
```
schema = pa.schema([("one", pa.int32()), ("two", pa.string())])
partitioning = pa.dataset.partitioning(schema, flavor="hive")
ds = ray.data.read_parquet(... dataset_kwargs=dict(partitioning=partitioning))
```

This is problematic for two reasons:
1. It tightly couples the interface with the implementation;
partitioning only works if we use `pyarrow.Dataset` in a specific way in
the implementation.
2. It's inconsistent with all of the other file-based API. All other
APIs use expose a top-level `partitioning` parameter (rather than
`dataset_kwargs`) where you pass a Ray Data `Partitioning` object
(rather than a PyArrow partitioning object).

---------

Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <bveeramani@berkeley.edu>
Signed-off-by: ujjawal-khare <ujjawal.khare@dream11.com>
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
)

To extract path partition information with `read_parquet`, you pass a
PyArrow `partitioning` object to `dataset_kwargs`. For example:
```
schema = pa.schema([("one", pa.int32()), ("two", pa.string())])
partitioning = pa.dataset.partitioning(schema, flavor="hive")
ds = ray.data.read_parquet(... dataset_kwargs=dict(partitioning=partitioning))
```

This is problematic for two reasons:
1. It tightly couples the interface with the implementation;
partitioning only works if we use `pyarrow.Dataset` in a specific way in
the implementation.
2. It's inconsistent with all of the other file-based API. All other
APIs use expose a top-level `partitioning` parameter (rather than
`dataset_kwargs`) where you pass a Ray Data `Partitioning` object
(rather than a PyArrow partitioning object).

---------

Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <bveeramani@berkeley.edu>
Signed-off-by: ujjawal-khare <ujjawal.khare@dream11.com>
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
)

To extract path partition information with `read_parquet`, you pass a
PyArrow `partitioning` object to `dataset_kwargs`. For example:
```
schema = pa.schema([("one", pa.int32()), ("two", pa.string())])
partitioning = pa.dataset.partitioning(schema, flavor="hive")
ds = ray.data.read_parquet(... dataset_kwargs=dict(partitioning=partitioning))
```

This is problematic for two reasons:
1. It tightly couples the interface with the implementation;
partitioning only works if we use `pyarrow.Dataset` in a specific way in
the implementation.
2. It's inconsistent with all of the other file-based API. All other
APIs use expose a top-level `partitioning` parameter (rather than
`dataset_kwargs`) where you pass a Ray Data `Partitioning` object
(rather than a PyArrow partitioning object).

---------

Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <bveeramani@berkeley.edu>
Signed-off-by: ujjawal-khare <ujjawal.khare@dream11.com>
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
)

To extract path partition information with `read_parquet`, you pass a
PyArrow `partitioning` object to `dataset_kwargs`. For example:
```
schema = pa.schema([("one", pa.int32()), ("two", pa.string())])
partitioning = pa.dataset.partitioning(schema, flavor="hive")
ds = ray.data.read_parquet(... dataset_kwargs=dict(partitioning=partitioning))
```

This is problematic for two reasons:
1. It tightly couples the interface with the implementation;
partitioning only works if we use `pyarrow.Dataset` in a specific way in
the implementation.
2. It's inconsistent with all of the other file-based API. All other
APIs use expose a top-level `partitioning` parameter (rather than
`dataset_kwargs`) where you pass a Ray Data `Partitioning` object
(rather than a PyArrow partitioning object).

---------

Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <bveeramani@berkeley.edu>
Signed-off-by: ujjawal-khare <ujjawal.khare@dream11.com>
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
)

To extract path partition information with `read_parquet`, you pass a
PyArrow `partitioning` object to `dataset_kwargs`. For example:
```
schema = pa.schema([("one", pa.int32()), ("two", pa.string())])
partitioning = pa.dataset.partitioning(schema, flavor="hive")
ds = ray.data.read_parquet(... dataset_kwargs=dict(partitioning=partitioning))
```

This is problematic for two reasons:
1. It tightly couples the interface with the implementation;
partitioning only works if we use `pyarrow.Dataset` in a specific way in
the implementation.
2. It's inconsistent with all of the other file-based API. All other
APIs use expose a top-level `partitioning` parameter (rather than
`dataset_kwargs`) where you pass a Ray Data `Partitioning` object
(rather than a PyArrow partitioning object).

---------

Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <bveeramani@berkeley.edu>
Signed-off-by: ujjawal-khare <ujjawal.khare@dream11.com>
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
)

To extract path partition information with `read_parquet`, you pass a
PyArrow `partitioning` object to `dataset_kwargs`. For example:
```
schema = pa.schema([("one", pa.int32()), ("two", pa.string())])
partitioning = pa.dataset.partitioning(schema, flavor="hive")
ds = ray.data.read_parquet(... dataset_kwargs=dict(partitioning=partitioning))
```

This is problematic for two reasons:
1. It tightly couples the interface with the implementation;
partitioning only works if we use `pyarrow.Dataset` in a specific way in
the implementation.
2. It's inconsistent with all of the other file-based API. All other
APIs use expose a top-level `partitioning` parameter (rather than
`dataset_kwargs`) where you pass a Ray Data `Partitioning` object
(rather than a PyArrow partitioning object).

---------

Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <bveeramani@berkeley.edu>
Signed-off-by: ujjawal-khare <ujjawal.khare@dream11.com>
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
)

To extract path partition information with `read_parquet`, you pass a
PyArrow `partitioning` object to `dataset_kwargs`. For example:
```
schema = pa.schema([("one", pa.int32()), ("two", pa.string())])
partitioning = pa.dataset.partitioning(schema, flavor="hive")
ds = ray.data.read_parquet(... dataset_kwargs=dict(partitioning=partitioning))
```

This is problematic for two reasons:
1. It tightly couples the interface with the implementation;
partitioning only works if we use `pyarrow.Dataset` in a specific way in
the implementation.
2. It's inconsistent with all of the other file-based API. All other
APIs use expose a top-level `partitioning` parameter (rather than
`dataset_kwargs`) where you pass a Ray Data `Partitioning` object
(rather than a PyArrow partitioning object).

---------

Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <bveeramani@berkeley.edu>
Signed-off-by: ujjawal-khare <ujjawal.khare@dream11.com>
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
)

To extract path partition information with `read_parquet`, you pass a
PyArrow `partitioning` object to `dataset_kwargs`. For example:
```
schema = pa.schema([("one", pa.int32()), ("two", pa.string())])
partitioning = pa.dataset.partitioning(schema, flavor="hive")
ds = ray.data.read_parquet(... dataset_kwargs=dict(partitioning=partitioning))
```

This is problematic for two reasons:
1. It tightly couples the interface with the implementation;
partitioning only works if we use `pyarrow.Dataset` in a specific way in
the implementation.
2. It's inconsistent with all of the other file-based API. All other
APIs use expose a top-level `partitioning` parameter (rather than
`dataset_kwargs`) where you pass a Ray Data `Partitioning` object
(rather than a PyArrow partitioning object).

---------

Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <bveeramani@berkeley.edu>
Signed-off-by: ujjawal-khare <ujjawal.khare@dream11.com>
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
)

To extract path partition information with `read_parquet`, you pass a
PyArrow `partitioning` object to `dataset_kwargs`. For example:
```
schema = pa.schema([("one", pa.int32()), ("two", pa.string())])
partitioning = pa.dataset.partitioning(schema, flavor="hive")
ds = ray.data.read_parquet(... dataset_kwargs=dict(partitioning=partitioning))
```

This is problematic for two reasons:
1. It tightly couples the interface with the implementation;
partitioning only works if we use `pyarrow.Dataset` in a specific way in
the implementation.
2. It's inconsistent with all of the other file-based API. All other
APIs use expose a top-level `partitioning` parameter (rather than
`dataset_kwargs`) where you pass a Ray Data `Partitioning` object
(rather than a PyArrow partitioning object).

---------

Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <bveeramani@berkeley.edu>
Signed-off-by: ujjawal-khare <ujjawal.khare@dream11.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
go add ONLY when ready to merge, run all tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants