Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Data] Deprecate read_parquet_bulk #48691

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 12, 2024
Merged

[Data] Deprecate read_parquet_bulk #48691

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 12, 2024

Conversation

bveeramani
Copy link
Member

@bveeramani bveeramani commented Nov 11, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Why are these changes needed?

Users (including Ray Data developers!) are often confused about how to choose between read_parquet and read_parquet_bulk. To avoid confusion, this PR deprecates read_parquet_bulk.

Related issue number

Checks

  • I've signed off every commit(by using the -s flag, i.e., git commit -s) in this PR.
  • I've run scripts/format.sh to lint the changes in this PR.
  • I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/.
    • I've added any new APIs to the API Reference. For example, if I added a
      method in Tune, I've added it in doc/source/tune/api/ under the
      corresponding .rst file.
  • I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Release tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

@bveeramani
Initial commit
8c51310 
Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <bveeramani@berkeley.edu>
omatthew98
omatthew98 reviewed Nov 12, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@omatthew98 omatthew98 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹

@bveeramani bveeramani enabled auto-merge (squash) November 12, 2024 18:33
@github-actions github-actions bot added the go add ONLY when ready to merge, run all tests label Nov 12, 2024
@bveeramani bveeramani merged commit 7bbab39 into master Nov 12, 2024
6 checks passed
@bveeramani bveeramani deleted the deprecate-read-parquet-bulk branch November 12, 2024 19:23
JP-sDEV pushed a commit to JP-sDEV/ray that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
@bveeramani @JP-sDEV
[Data] Deprecate read_parquet_bulk (ray-project#48691)
1d90b5b 
Users (including Ray Data developers!) are often confused about how to
choose between `read_parquet` and `read_parquet_bulk`. To avoid
confusion, this PR deprecates `read_parquet_bulk`.

Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <bveeramani@berkeley.edu>
mohitjain2504 pushed a commit to mohitjain2504/ray that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2024
@bveeramani @mohitjain2504
[Data] Deprecate read_parquet_bulk (ray-project#48691)
e0e949a 
Users (including Ray Data developers!) are often confused about how to
choose between `read_parquet` and `read_parquet_bulk`. To avoid
confusion, this PR deprecates `read_parquet_bulk`.

Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <bveeramani@berkeley.edu>
Signed-off-by: mohitjain2504 <mohit.jain@dream11.com>
dentiny pushed a commit to dentiny/ray that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2024
@bveeramani @dentiny
[Data] Deprecate read_parquet_bulk (ray-project#48691)
8023878 
Users (including Ray Data developers!) are often confused about how to
choose between `read_parquet` and `read_parquet_bulk`. To avoid
confusion, this PR deprecates `read_parquet_bulk`.

Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <bveeramani@berkeley.edu>
Signed-off-by: hjiang <dentinyhao@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@omatthew98 omatthew98 omatthew98 approved these changes

@scottjlee scottjlee Awaiting requested review from scottjlee

@raulchen raulchen Awaiting requested review from raulchen

@stephanie-wang stephanie-wang Awaiting requested review from stephanie-wang

@alexeykudinkin alexeykudinkin Awaiting requested review from alexeykudinkin

@srinathk10 srinathk10 Awaiting requested review from srinathk10

Assignees

@omatthew98 omatthew98

Labels
go add ONLY when ready to merge, run all tests
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@bveeramani @omatthew98