Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add instance variables to many default dashboard graphs #49174

Merged

Conversation

alanwguo
Copy link
Contributor

@alanwguo alanwguo commented Dec 9, 2024

Why are these changes needed?

It's confusing that there is an "Instance" drop down in Grafana but many of the graphs don't respect it.
THis changes it so most graphs respect it and puts a note in the description for those that do not.

Related issue number

Checks

  • I've signed off every commit(by using the -s flag, i.e., git commit -s) in this PR.
  • I've run scripts/format.sh to lint the changes in this PR.
  • I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/.
    • I've added any new APIs to the API Reference. For example, if I added a
      method in Tune, I've added it in doc/source/tune/api/ under the
      corresponding .rst file.
  • I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Release tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

Signed-off-by: Alan Guo <aguo@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Guo <aguo@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Guo <aguo@anyscale.com>
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ def max_plus_pending(max_resource, pending_resource):
Panel(
id=33,
title="Scheduler Actor State",
description="Current number of actors in a particular state.\n\nState: the actor state, as described by rpc::ActorTableData proto in gcs.proto.",
description='Note: not impacted by "Instance" variable.\n\nCurrent number of actors in a particular state.\n\nState: the actor state, as described by rpc::ActorTableData proto in gcs.proto.',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@alanwguo can you please file a ticket to fix it in Core and add a TODO here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks like, this is already avialable with the NodeAddress label. Updated the graphs here

@alexeykudinkin alexeykudinkin added the go add ONLY when ready to merge, run all tests label Dec 10, 2024
Signed-off-by: Alan Guo <aguo@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Guo <aguo@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Guo <aguo@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Guo <aguo@anyscale.com>
@jjyao jjyao merged commit 038d679 into ray-project:master Dec 11, 2024
5 checks passed
simonsays1980 pushed a commit to simonsays1980/ray that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2024
ujjawal-khare pushed a commit to ujjawal-khare-27/ray that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2024
…ay-project#49174)

Signed-off-by: Alan Guo <aguo@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: ujjawal-khare <ujjawal.khare@dream11.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
go add ONLY when ready to merge, run all tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants