Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Set project license to Apache 2.0 #339

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 28, 2018
Merged

Conversation

spencern
Copy link
Contributor

Resolves #326
Impact: critical
Type: chore

Issue

We've needed to choose a license for this project.

Solution

@saralouhicks @ticean and I met to discuss this and while we're still working on a decision framework for choosing licenses for new projects, we'll use a permissive license, the Apache 2.0 license for this project.

Copy link
Contributor

@machikoyasuda machikoyasuda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@spencern Looks good! Just to be sure, let's add it as a .md markdown file.

@spencern
Copy link
Contributor Author

@machikoyasuda are you certain this should be a markdown file? The format does not appear to be markdown - I used the github license chooser to generate this file

@machikoyasuda
Copy link
Contributor

@spencern Ah! Then it should be alright. Once we merge this PR, the license should appear on the repo homepage, and that's how we'll know it's correct.

@machikoyasuda
Copy link
Contributor

Actually - one last thing - we should add a line about the Apache license down in the README here, https://github.com/reactioncommerce/reaction-next-starterkit#license

Copy link
Member

@saralouhicks saralouhicks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@machikoyasuda
Copy link
Contributor

👍

@spencern spencern merged commit 765ca61 into develop Sep 28, 2018
@spencern spencern deleted the chore-add-apache-2 branch September 28, 2018 22:50
This was referenced Jan 15, 2019
@spencern spencern mentioned this pull request Jan 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants