Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DOCUMENTATION] minor update #103

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Sep 14, 2024
Merged

Conversation

reactive-firewall
Copy link
Owner

@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall commented Sep 14, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the license information for various dependencies in the requirements files for clarity and consistency.
    • Commented out inactive dependencies, including virtualenv, six, pgpy, and tox.

 & #80 -)

### ChangeLog:

Changes in file tests/requirements.txt:
 pytest-enabler>=1.0.1
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall self-assigned this Sep 14, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added Configs Improvements or additions to configuration Testing Something can be verified CI Continuous Integration Tooling labels Sep 14, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces updates to the tests/requirements.txt and requirements.txt files, focusing on the license information for various dependencies. It standardizes the spelling of "license," clarifies previously ambiguous licenses, and comments out some packages that are no longer active dependencies. These changes enhance the documentation regarding licensing without affecting the functionality of the code.

Changes

File Change Summary
tests/requirements.txt Updated license comments for multiple dependencies, changing "licence" to "license" and clarifying license types for pep8, pytest, and others. Commented out inactive dependencies.
requirements.txt Standardized "license" spelling and specified licenses for sphinx, setuptools, pip, build, multicast, and wheel. Commented out inactive dependencies.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Documentation

Poem

🐇 In the garden of code, where the licenses play,
A hop here, a skip there, we clarify today.
From PSF to MIT, the truth we now share,
With a flick of the tail, we spread knowledge with care.
So let’s dance in the fields, with comments so bright,
For every small change makes our project just right! 🌼


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between aaea047 and 2f7a956.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • requirements.txt (1 hunks)
  • tests/requirements.txt (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • requirements.txt
  • tests/requirements.txt

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

This was linked to issues Sep 14, 2024

This comment was marked as outdated.

@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall marked this pull request as ready for review September 14, 2024 02:44
tests/requirements.txt Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/requirements.txt Show resolved Hide resolved
…96 & #103 -)

### ChangeLog:

Changes in file tests/requirements.txt:
 tox>=3.0.0, !=3.16.1
…WIP #96 & #103 -)

### ChangeLog:

Changes in file tests/requirements.txt:
 tox>=3.0.0, !=3.16.1
tests/requirements.txt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/requirements.txt Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/requirements.txt Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/requirements.txt Show resolved Hide resolved
…tails (- WIP #96 & #103 -)

### ChangeLog:

Changes in file tests/requirements.txt:
 flake8>=3.9.2
…(- WIP #96 & #103 -)

### ChangeLog:

Changes in file tests/requirements.txt:
 flake8>=3.9.2
#103 -)

### ChangeLog:

Changes in file tests/requirements.txt:
 Unknown Changes
…ils (- WIP #96 & #103 -)

### ChangeLog:

Changes in file tests/requirements.txt:
 pep8>=1.0
### ChangeLog:

Changes in file requirements.txt:
 Unknown Changes
…103 -)

### ChangeLog:

Changes in file tests/requirements.txt:
 Unknown Changes
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 14, 2024

@reactive-firewall: No problem! I'll continue reviewing the PR now.

Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall merged commit 4798e3d into master Sep 14, 2024
129 checks passed
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall deleted the HOTFIX-deps-style-update branch September 14, 2024 09:33
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall mentioned this pull request Sep 15, 2024
26 tasks
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall mentioned this pull request Sep 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CI Continuous Integration Tooling Configs Improvements or additions to configuration Testing Something can be verified
Projects
Status: Archive Backlog
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Documentation review Version 1.5 overall style consistentcy
1 participant