Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CONFIGURATION] Makefile Error Logging support #78

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 12, 2024

Conversation

reactive-firewall
Copy link
Owner

@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall commented Sep 11, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced error logging mechanism to capture error messages in a specified log file.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved visibility of errors during package installations, clean-up operations, and test executions.

…ath in the main Makefile (- WIP #77 -)

### ChangeLog:

Changes in file Makefile:
 PHONY: cleanup init must_be_root must_have_flake must_have_pytest uninstall
 ifeq "$(COMMAND)" ""
 ifeq "$(LC_CTYPE)" ""
 must_have_flake:
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall self-assigned this Sep 11, 2024
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall linked an issue Sep 11, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes to the Makefile introduce a mechanism for enhanced error logging. A default value for ERROR_LOG_PATH is established, directing error outputs to a specified log file instead of discarding them. Instances of error suppression using 2>/dev/null are replaced with 2>$(ERROR_LOG_PATH), improving the capture of error messages across various commands, including installations and tests.

Changes

Files Change Summary
Makefile Added default assignment for ERROR_LOG_PATH and replaced error redirection to use this variable.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Refactor error suppression (#77)

Suggested labels

Bash Lang, Documentation

Poem

🐰 In the garden where errors hide,
A path for logs we now provide.
No more lost messages in the night,
With ERROR_LOG_PATH, we’ll see the light!
Hops of joy for changes made,
In our build, no fears invade! 🌼


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c009b87 and 21e0ab1.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • Makefile (6 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
Makefile (5)

27-29: LGTM!

The conditional check for setting a default value for ERROR_LOG_PATH is a good addition. It ensures that error messages are redirected to /dev/null by default if no specific log path is configured. This provides a fallback behavior for error logging.


45-45: LGTM!

Redirecting the error output of the command to $(ERROR_LOG_PATH) is a good practice. It ensures that any errors encountered while searching for the make executable are captured in the specified error log file. This change aligns with the overall goal of enhancing error logging in the Makefile.


138-139: LGTM!

Redirecting the error output of the pip install commands to $(ERROR_LOG_PATH) is a good practice. It ensures that any errors encountered during the installation of dependencies are captured in the specified error log file. This change aligns with the overall goal of enhancing error logging in the Makefile.


Line range hint 148-239: LGTM!

Redirecting the error output of the uninstallation, cleaning, and removal commands to $(ERROR_LOG_PATH) is a good practice. It ensures that any errors encountered during these operations are captured in the specified error log file. This change aligns with the overall goal of enhancing error logging in the Makefile.


Line range hint 243-264: LGTM!

Redirecting the error output of the documentation cleaning and user installation commands to $(ERROR_LOG_PATH) is a good practice. It ensures that any errors encountered during these operations are captured in the specified error log file. This change aligns with the overall goal of enhancing error logging in the Makefile.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall added enhancement New feature or request Multicast Any main project file changes Configs Improvements or additions to configuration labels Sep 11, 2024
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall added this to the DRY/AHA Refactor milestone Sep 11, 2024
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall marked this pull request as ready for review September 11, 2024 06:48
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.073%. Comparing base (c009b87) to head (21e0ab1).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master       #78   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   96.073%   96.073%           
=========================================
  Files            6         6           
  Lines          382       382           
  Branches        30        30           
=========================================
  Hits           367       367           
  Misses           9         9           
  Partials         6         6           
Flag Coverage Δ
3.10 95.979% <ø> (ø)
3.11 95.979% <ø> (ø)
3.12 95.979% <ø> (ø)
3.7 86.207% <ø> (ø)
3.8 86.167% <ø> (ø)
3.9 86.167% <ø> (ø)
macos-13 87.435% <ø> (ø)
macos-latest 95.979% <ø> (ø)
multicast 96.073% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu-latest 96.073% <ø> (ø)
windows-latest 84.031% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c009b87...21e0ab1. Read the comment docs.

@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall mentioned this pull request Sep 12, 2024
26 tasks
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall merged commit 690aeed into master Sep 12, 2024
191 checks passed
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall deleted the 77-refactor-error-suppression branch September 13, 2024 03:52
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall mentioned this pull request Sep 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Configs Improvements or additions to configuration enhancement New feature or request Multicast Any main project file changes
Projects
Status: Archive Backlog
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Refactor error suppression
1 participant