release hotfix: Adapt to MonoSubscriber not fusing by default #288
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In reactor-core,
Operators.MonoSubscriber
has stopped implementingASYNC fusion as a base. It continues to be compatible with Fuseable
publishers but now by default only negotiates
Fuseable.NONE
.Some RxJava adapter classes don't really have a way of propagating the
fusion up to RxJava and used to rely on the default ASYNC capability
of MonoSubscriber, testing that
requestFusion
would indeed negotiatethat. Now that it negotiates NONE, said tests fail.
This commit removes the tests and adds a FIXME as a more in depth follow
up to this issue (where we can evaluate if it makes sense to keep the
publishers Fuseable).
Also update to latest 3.4.x core snapshot.
See reactor/reactor-core#3245.