Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

raise docutils version bound #1559

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

raise docutils version bound #1559

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

alex
Copy link

@alex alex commented Apr 21, 2024

fixes #1557

@alex alex requested a review from a team as a code owner April 21, 2024 02:51
@alex alex changed the title Attempt to raise docutils version bound raise docutils version bound Apr 21, 2024
@alex
Copy link
Author

alex commented May 5, 2024

Is there anything I can do to help move this forward?

@stsewd
Copy link
Member

stsewd commented May 6, 2024

We may need to do some visual testing, I think we did that in the past (cc @agjohnson).

From the changelog I see some entries of interest:

  • Stop setting the "footnote-reference" class value for footnote references. Use the CSS selector [role="doc-noteref"] (works since Docutils 0.18, see minimal.css for examples).
  • Embed SVG images as instead of data-URI.

@alex
Copy link
Author

alex commented Jul 30, 2024

Tests failing because of Sphinx 8.

@madmiraal madmiraal mentioned this pull request Aug 4, 2024
@alex alex deleted the patch-1 branch August 20, 2024 11:26
@humitos
Copy link
Member

humitos commented Aug 20, 2024

We released a new version 3.0.0rc1 that adds support for latest docutils versions. Please, give it a try and open an issue for any problem or feedback you want to share with us.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support for docutils 0.21
3 participants