Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check at the violation position if a correction can be applied #5682

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 20, 2024

Conversation

SimplyDanny
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@SwiftLintBot
Copy link

SwiftLintBot commented Jul 20, 2024

1 Warning
⚠️ If this is a user-facing change, please include a CHANGELOG entry to credit yourself!
You can find it at CHANGELOG.md.
17 Messages
📖 Linting Aerial with this PR took 0.66s vs 0.67s on main (1% faster)
📖 Linting Alamofire with this PR took 0.91s vs 0.93s on main (2% faster)
📖 Linting Brave with this PR took 5.23s vs 5.28s on main (0% faster)
📖 Linting DuckDuckGo with this PR took 3.14s vs 3.08s on main (1% slower)
📖 Linting Firefox with this PR took 8.17s vs 8.15s on main (0% slower)
📖 Linting Kickstarter with this PR took 6.94s vs 6.98s on main (0% faster)
📖 Linting Moya with this PR took 0.41s vs 0.42s on main (2% faster)
📖 Linting NetNewsWire with this PR took 1.88s vs 1.87s on main (0% slower)
📖 Linting Nimble with this PR took 0.56s vs 0.56s on main (0% slower)
📖 Linting PocketCasts with this PR took 6.23s vs 6.24s on main (0% faster)
📖 Linting Quick with this PR took 0.35s vs 0.35s on main (0% slower)
📖 Linting Realm with this PR took 3.42s vs 3.44s on main (0% faster)
📖 Linting Sourcery with this PR took 1.73s vs 1.75s on main (1% faster)
📖 Linting Swift with this PR took 3.15s vs 3.16s on main (0% faster)
📖 Linting VLC with this PR took 0.95s vs 0.94s on main (1% slower)
📖 Linting Wire with this PR took 12.34s vs 12.42s on main (0% faster)
📖 Linting WordPress with this PR took 8.2s vs 8.26s on main (0% faster)

Here's an example of your CHANGELOG entry:

* Check at the violation position if a correction can be applied.  
  [SimplyDanny](https://github.com/SimplyDanny)
  [#issue_number](https://github.com/realm/SwiftLint/issues/issue_number)

note: There are two invisible spaces after the entry's text.

Generated by 🚫 Danger

@SimplyDanny SimplyDanny force-pushed the check-violation-position branch from 27a82fa to 5444217 Compare July 20, 2024 17:49
@SimplyDanny SimplyDanny merged commit 2cc1acb into realm:main Jul 20, 2024
12 checks passed
@SimplyDanny SimplyDanny deleted the check-violation-position branch July 20, 2024 21:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants