This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 15, 2024. It is now read-only.
Add AppStream 2.0 Service Coverage #167
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tomvachon
force-pushed
the
feature/appstream
branch
from
c62ad08
to
c5bac8c
Compare
|
Can we get this into the 2.0.1 @svenwltr ? I am not sure why its still hanging out |
Me neither :-) |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Note: per #122 I had to get a little creative around ImageBuilders. I made a "Waiting" resource type which does nothing but ensure that whatever condition the ImageBuilder Remove() resource type needs can be satisified if its the last resource left in the Queue otherwise it will error out.