Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fetal Health Classification #854

Merged
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
32 changes: 32 additions & 0 deletions Fetal Health Classification/README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
# Fetal Health Classification

## Overview
This project aims to predict fetal health status using various machine learning models. The dataset contains records of fetal health measurements, and the goal is to classify the health status into three categories: normal, suspect, and pathologic.

The project involves data exploration, preprocessing, model training, hyperparameter tuning, and evaluation.

## Dataset
The Fetal Health Classification dataset contains 2,126 records of features extracted from Cardiotocogram (CTG) exams. These features were classified by three expert obstetricians into three categories: Normal, Suspect, and Pathological. The dataset aims to support the development of models that can classify fetal health, helping to prevent child and maternal mortality.

Link to the dataset: [Fetal Health Classification Dataset](https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/andrewmvd/fetal-health-classification/data)


## Models Used

1. Logistic Regression
2. Decision Tree Classifier
3. Random Forest Classifier
4. Gradient Boosting Classifier

## Results
The test accuracy results for the models are as follows:

- Gradient Boosting: 96.00%
- Random Forest: 95.00%
- Decision Tree: 93.00%
- Logistic Regression: 89.00%

Ensemble methods like Gradient Boosting and Random Forest performed the best, indicating strong predictive power on unseen data compared to simpler models like Decision Tree and Logistic Regression.

## Contribution
Contributions are welcome! Feel free to submit issues, feature requests, or pull requests to improve the system.

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

Loading
Loading