Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BUG 2139323: return error if last sync time not present #146

Merged

Conversation

Madhu-1
Copy link
Member

@Madhu-1 Madhu-1 commented Nov 3, 2022

As per the csiaddon spec, last sync time is a required parameter in the GetVolumeReplicationInfo if we are failed to parse the description, we return an error message instead of nil which is an empty response.

Signed-off-by: madhupr007@gmail.com

Backport of ceph#3489

Sometime the json unmarshal might
get success and return empty time
stamp. add a check to make sure the
time is not zero always.

Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3e1f602)
As per the csiaddon spec last sync time is
required parameter in the GetVolumeReplicationInfo
if we are failed to parse the description, return
not found error message instead of nil
which is empty response

Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 8f25edc)
csi-addons/spec#47
defines the error messages for the
GetVolumeReplicationInfo RPC call.

Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3cce629)
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 3, 2022

@Madhu-1: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2139323, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (ODF 4.12.0) matches configured target release for branch (ODF 4.12.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @keesturam

In response to this:

BUG 2139323: return error if last sync time not present

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 3, 2022

@openshift-ci[bot]: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: keesturam.

Note that only red-hat-storage members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@Madhu-1: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2139323, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (ODF 4.12.0) matches configured target release for branch (ODF 4.12.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @keesturam

In response to this:

BUG 2139323: return error if last sync time not present

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Its a good idea label Nov 3, 2022
@Madhu-1
Copy link
Member Author

Madhu-1 commented Nov 3, 2022

/assing @red-hat-storage/ceph-csi-contributors

Copy link
Member

@Rakshith-R Rakshith-R left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Code looks good label Nov 3, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 3, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Madhu-1, Rakshith-R

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 9d4878f into red-hat-storage:release-4.12 Nov 3, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 3, 2022

@Madhu-1: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2139323 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

BUG 2139323: return error if last sync time not present

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants