Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merging the Weekly suites #4239

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2024

Conversation

AmarnatReddy
Copy link
Contributor

@AmarnatReddy AmarnatReddy commented Nov 20, 2024

Description

Merging the Weekly suites

Merged below suites :
#  1.tier-3_cephfs_test_cephfs-top.yaml
#  2.tier-4_cephfs_recovery.yaml#
#  3.tier-2_cephfs_test-metrics.yaml
#  4.tier-3_cephfs_test_performance.yaml
#  5.tier-2_cephfs_test_mds_pinning.yaml
#  6.tier-2_cephfs_generic.yaml
#  7.tier-1_fs_kernel_pipeline.yaml 

Logs : http://magna002.ceph.redhat.com/cephci-jenkins/cephci-run-QTIPKJ/
we are seeing 10 failures all are known issues and product bugs.

After running I have verified cluster state it is in HEALTH_OK

I have missed fs_kernel re-running on the same setup

Please include Automation development guidelines. Source of Test case - New Feature/Regression Test/Close loop of customer BZs

click to expand checklist
  • Create a test case in Polarion reviewed and approved.
  • Create a design/automation approach doc. Optional for tests with similar tests already automated.
  • Review the automation design
  • Implement the test script and perform test runs
  • Submit PR for code review and approve
  • Update Polarion Test with Automation script details and update automation fields
  • If automation is part of Close loop, update BZ flag qe-test_coverage “+” and link Polarion test

desc: Verify Snapshot retention works even after service restarts
abort-on-fail: false
config:
test_name: snap_retention_service_restart
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add corresponding BZ id as comment for the failure seen

Signed-off-by: Amarnath K <amk@li-132ff74c-24e7-11b2-a85c-eca3000aa1e4.ibm.com>
hkadam134
hkadam134 previously approved these changes Nov 27, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@hkadam134 hkadam134 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Add this label when the PR is good to be merged label Nov 27, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Add this label when the PR is good to be merged label Nov 27, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Add this label when the PR is good to be merged label Nov 28, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@tintumathew10 tintumathew10 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 28, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: AmarnatReddy, hkadam134, sumabai, tintumathew10

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 3b33c26 into red-hat-storage:master Nov 28, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Add this label when the PR is good to be merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants