-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added policies warn-k8s-namespace-conftestcombine-bestpractices #27
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: garethahealy The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
manifests[i].kind == "Namespace" | ||
namespace := manifests[i] | ||
|
||
not namespaceHasNetworkPolicy(namespace, manifests) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@garethahealy - does namespace := manifests[i]
pop the item out of the array so it's no longer in manifests
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no, just sets the var - I just do that to make it easier to read
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh ok - so namespace is not needed in your function below
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not currently, but if the policy was to be extended to match selectors, then yep it would
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's grand, i'll merge this one in now so.
/lgtm |
What is this PR About?
Split out: #19
How do we test this?
See the action
cc: @redhat-cop/rego-policies