Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove podman from experimental mode #6628

Conversation

feloy
Copy link
Contributor

@feloy feloy commented Feb 28, 2023

What type of PR is this:

/kind feature

What does this PR do / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #6592

PR acceptance criteria:

  • Unit test

  • Integration test

  • Documentation

How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer:

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Deploy Preview for odo-docusaurus-preview ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit b1ebb98
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/odo-docusaurus-preview/deploys/6405bfdac1876000089eabd0
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-6628--odo-docusaurus-preview.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. Required by Prow. kind/feature Categorizes issue as a feature request. For PRs, that means that the PR is the implementation labels Feb 28, 2023
@odo-robot
Copy link

odo-robot bot commented Feb 28, 2023

OpenShift Unauthenticated Tests on commit fee9482 finished successfully.
View logs: TXT HTML

@odo-robot
Copy link

odo-robot bot commented Feb 28, 2023

NoCluster Tests on commit fee9482 finished successfully.
View logs: TXT HTML

@odo-robot
Copy link

odo-robot bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Unit Tests on commit fee9482 finished successfully.
View logs: TXT HTML

@odo-robot
Copy link

odo-robot bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Windows Tests (OCP) on commit fee9482 finished with errors.
View logs: TXT HTML

@odo-robot
Copy link

odo-robot bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Validate Tests on commit fee9482 finished successfully.
View logs: TXT HTML

@odo-robot
Copy link

odo-robot bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Kubernetes Tests on commit fee9482 finished successfully.
View logs: TXT HTML

@odo-robot
Copy link

odo-robot bot commented Feb 28, 2023

OpenShift Tests on commit fee9482 finished successfully.
View logs: TXT HTML

@feloy feloy force-pushed the feature-6592/podman-not-experimental branch from aa4164c to 28695f9 Compare February 28, 2023 15:21
@odo-robot
Copy link

odo-robot bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Kubernetes Docs Tests on commit 851b171 finished successfully.
View logs: TXT HTML

@feloy feloy force-pushed the feature-6592/podman-not-experimental branch from 28695f9 to 5f12466 Compare February 28, 2023 15:55
@feloy feloy closed this Mar 2, 2023
@feloy feloy reopened this Mar 2, 2023
@feloy feloy force-pushed the feature-6592/podman-not-experimental branch from 2621fdf to 613b2c7 Compare March 2, 2023 14:35
@feloy feloy requested review from rm3l and removed request for rnapoles-rh March 3, 2023 12:47
@feloy feloy changed the title [wip] Remove podman from experimental mode Remove podman from experimental mode Mar 3, 2023
@feloy feloy removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. Required by Prow. label Mar 3, 2023
@feloy
Copy link
Contributor Author

feloy commented Mar 3, 2023

This PR is ready for review. I would like to work on the latest task (add documentation explaining the limitations of podman implementations) on a different PR.

docs/website/docs/command-reference/delete-component.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/website/docs/command-reference/delete-component.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/website/docs/command-reference/describe-component.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/website/docs/command-reference/list-component.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/website/docs/command-reference/logs.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/website/docs/command-reference/dev.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@feloy feloy requested a review from rm3l March 6, 2023 07:10
@feloy feloy force-pushed the feature-6592/podman-not-experimental branch from d3c0d8a to b8e1946 Compare March 6, 2023 08:19
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. Required by Prow. label Mar 6, 2023
@@ -146,9 +146,8 @@ If you skipped Step 0 and selected "starter project", your output will be slight
### Step 2. Enabling the experimental mode
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we remove this section entirely now?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would prefer not to, by changing only the strict minimum the blog posts (here, we need to remove the links to the removed experimental-mode page, to make the website build)

@@ -28,8 +28,6 @@ Similarly to how `odo dev` requires specifying the target platform (using the `-
ODO_EXPERIMENTAL_MODE=t odo logs --platform podman
```

As a reminder, Podman support in `odo` is still [experimental](../docs/user-guides/advanced/experimental-mode) and requires you to [opt in](../docs/user-guides/advanced/experimental-mode#enabling-the-experimental-mode) if you want to try it out.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would keep this as is since at the time of v3.7.0 podman was still in experimental mode.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm reverting it, and only removing links

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
title: odo describe component
---

`odo describe component` command is useful for getting information about a component managed by `odo`.
`odo describe component` command is useful for getting information about a component.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is still true, no?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, it isn't anymore since #6615

@@ -190,7 +190,6 @@ Options here are mostly used for debugging and testing `odo` behavior.
| `DEVFILE_PROXY` | Integration tests will use this address as Devfile registry instead of `registry.stage.devfile.io` | v3.0.0-beta3 | `my-registry.example.com` |
| `TELEMETRY_CALLER` | Caller identifier passed to [telemetry](https://github.com/redhat-developer/odo/blob/main/USAGE_DATA.md). Case-insensitive. Acceptable values: `vscode`, `intellij`, `jboss`. | v3.1.0 | `intellij` |
| `ODO_TRACKING_CONSENT` | Useful for controlling [telemetry](https://github.com/redhat-developer/odo/blob/main/USAGE_DATA.md). Acceptable values: `yes` ([enables telemetry](https://github.com/redhat-developer/odo/blob/main/USAGE_DATA.md) and skips consent prompt), `no` (disables telemetry and consent prompt). Takes precedence over the [`ConsentTelemetry`](#preference-key-table) preference. | v3.2.0 | `yes` |
| `ODO_EXPERIMENTAL_MODE` | Whether to enable experimental features. See [Experimental Mode](../user-guides/advanced/experimental-mode) for more details. Acceptable values: boolean values<sup>(1)</sup> | v3.3.0 | `true` |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you comment this instead of completely removing it?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I notice that this makes the build fail, even when the link is into a comment (https://app.netlify.com/sites/odo-docusaurus-preview/deploys/6405b74c3f18100008d06cfd):

- On source page path = /docs/overview/configure:
  -> linking to ../user-guides/advanced/experimental-mode (resolved as: /docs/user-guides/advanced/experimental-mode)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it might be because you renamed the experimental-mode.md file. I would remove the link like you've done at other places.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The comment is not recognized as expected:
comment-odo-exp

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm reverting to remove completely the line. The commit is accessible if we want to revert the deletion

@valaparthvi
Copy link
Contributor

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. Required by Prow. label Mar 6, 2023
@@ -50,7 +50,6 @@ Example:
#### Using `odo` with Podman

Based on your valuable feedback, we have worked on improving the experience of using `odo` with Podman.
Note that this is still [experimental](../docs/user-guides/advanced/experimental-mode) and requires you to [opt in](../docs/user-guides/advanced/experimental-mode#enabling-the-experimental-mode) if you want to try it out.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe it's fine to keep this as it is (by removing link to the experimental mode doc) since at the time of v3.4.0 Podman was still in the experimental mode.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm reverting it, and only removing links

@feloy feloy force-pushed the feature-6592/podman-not-experimental branch from b8e1946 to 90342a4 Compare March 6, 2023 09:38
@feloy feloy force-pushed the feature-6592/podman-not-experimental branch from 90342a4 to 536bedc Compare March 6, 2023 09:50
@feloy feloy requested review from valaparthvi and rm3l March 6, 2023 09:50
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. Required by Prow. label Mar 6, 2023
@valaparthvi
Copy link
Contributor

Broken links:
On source page path = /docs/overview/configure:
3:20:48 PM: -> linking to ../user-guides/advanced/experimental-mode (resolved as: /docs/user-guides/advanced/experimental-mode)

@feloy
Copy link
Contributor Author

feloy commented Mar 6, 2023

Broken links: On source page path = /docs/overview/configure: 3:20:48 PM: -> linking to ../user-guides/advanced/experimental-mode (resolved as: /docs/user-guides/advanced/experimental-mode)

See #6628 (comment)

@feloy feloy force-pushed the feature-6592/podman-not-experimental branch from 536bedc to 6fe424a Compare March 6, 2023 10:14
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. Required by Prow. label Mar 6, 2023
@feloy feloy force-pushed the feature-6592/podman-not-experimental branch from 6fe424a to b1ebb98 Compare March 6, 2023 10:26
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Mar 6, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@feloy feloy requested a review from valaparthvi March 6, 2023 11:58
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. Required by Prow. label Mar 6, 2023
@feloy
Copy link
Contributor Author

feloy commented Mar 6, 2023

/override windows-integration-test/Windows-test
Flaky e2e test

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 6, 2023

@feloy: Overrode contexts on behalf of feloy: windows-integration-test/Windows-test

In response to this:

/override windows-integration-test/Windows-test
Flaky e2e test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 26c90d7 into redhat-developer:main Mar 6, 2023
@rm3l rm3l added this to the v3.8.0 🚀 milestone Mar 6, 2023
anandrkskd pushed a commit to anandrkskd/odo that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2023
* Remove podman from experimental mode

* Remove env var for odo dev

* Cleanup tests and sources about experimental mode

* Hide "Experimental mode" doc page

* Cleanup latest commit

* doc odo dev --platform podman

* Doc other commands

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Armel Soro <armel@rm3l.org>

* Remove more ODO_EXPERIMENTAL_MODE from latest commits on main

* Remove reference to Experimental mode from blog posts

---------

Co-authored-by: Armel Soro <armel@rm3l.org>
@rm3l rm3l added the area/odo-on-podman Issues or PRs related to running odo against Podman label Mar 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/odo-on-podman Issues or PRs related to running odo against Podman kind/feature Categorizes issue as a feature request. For PRs, that means that the PR is the implementation lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. Required by Prow.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Move podman out of Experimental Mode
4 participants