Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Restricted the duplicates of pod name #4299

Conversation

msivasubramaniaan
Copy link
Collaborator

Ref: #4298

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 25.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 43.88%. Comparing base (da60441) to head (e39f3f2).
Report is 376 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
src/explorer.ts 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
src/oc/ocWrapper.ts 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4299       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   32.37%   43.88%   +11.50%     
===========================================
  Files          85       95       +10     
  Lines        6505     7716     +1211     
  Branches     1349     1653      +304     
===========================================
+ Hits         2106     3386     +1280     
+ Misses       4399     4330       -69     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@datho7561 datho7561 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This fix works for me. Thanks, Muthu!

@datho7561 datho7561 merged commit d1c79b7 into redhat-developer:main Jul 18, 2024
4 checks passed
@msivasubramaniaan msivasubramaniaan deleted the 4298-duplicate-deployment-names-are-displaying-on-tree-view branch July 18, 2024 16:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants