refactor(server): remove redundant scene property #1038
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for reearth-web ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
kawasaki124529
changed the title
kawasaki124529
changed the title
kawasaki124529
changed the title
WalkthroughThe recent changes reflect a significant refactoring of the codebase, focusing on simplifying data models, reducing unnecessary functionality, and enhancing clarity. Key alterations include the removal of various fields and functions across multiple components, indicating a shift in how properties, scenes, and layers are managed. Additionally, updates to tests and workflows signify an overall commitment to improving code quality and maintainability. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant API
participant Service
participant Database
User->>API: Request to create a scene
API->>Service: Validate request and process
Service->>Database: Save scene data
Database-->>Service: Confirm save
Service-->>API: Return scene ID
API-->>User: Respond with scene ID
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (6)
server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_property_test.go (1)
11-12: Insufficient Test Coverage forTest_actualValueThe
Test_actualValuefunction currently includes only one test case, "Overridden value". To ensure adequate test coverage, consider adding more test cases to cover different scenarios, such as when the value is not overridden, edge cases, and potential error scenarios. This will help ensure the robustness of the function.Analysis chain
LGTM! But verify test coverage.
The simplification of the
Test_actualValuefunction looks good. Ensure that the test coverage remains adequate despite the removal of fields and assertions.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the test coverage for `Test_actualValue` to ensure it remains adequate. # Test: Check for other test cases related to `actualValue`. Expect: Adequate coverage of different scenarios. rg --type go -A 5 'Test_actualValue'Length of output: 476
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract more lines from the `Test_actualValue` function to analyze test coverage. rg --type go -A 20 'func Test_actualValue' server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_property_test.goLength of output: 419
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract more lines from the `Test_actualValue` function to capture all test cases and assertions. rg --type go -A 40 'func Test_actualValue' server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_property_test.goLength of output: 531
server/internal/usecase/repo/property.go (1)
Verify the impact of method removal on dependent code.
The methods
Filtered,FindLinkedAll, andFindByDatasetare still present in the codebase and appear to be used in various files. Their removal from thePropertyinterface could lead to issues if not addressed. Please ensure that all dependent code is updated or refactored accordingly.
- Files with potential issues:
server/internal/infrastructure/mongo/property.go- Various files using the
FilteredmethodAnalysis chain
Line range hint
10-20:
Verify the impact of method removal on dependent code.The removal of methods such as
Filtered,FindLinkedAll, andFindByDatasetfrom thePropertyinterface may affect dependent code. Ensure that all code relying on these methods is updated or refactored.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of removed methods in the codebase. # Test: Search for the removed methods in the codebase. Expect: No occurrences of these methods in dependent code. rg --type go 'Filtered|FindLinkedAll|FindByDataset'Length of output: 5787
server/internal/adapter/gql/gqlmodel/convert_scene.go (1)
48-55: Impact of RemovingClustersField: Issues FoundThe
Clustersfield is still actively used across various parts of the codebase, including:
- Use case interactor logic (
server/internal/usecase/interactor/scene.go)- MongoDB document handling (
server/internal/infrastructure/mongo/mongodoc/scene.go)- Scene building and testing (
server/pkg/scene/builder.go,server/pkg/scene/scene_test.go)Removing this field will likely cause functionality issues. The
RootLayerIDfield, however, appears to be safely removable as it is not found in the codebase. Please review the usage ofClustersto ensure that any removal or refactoring does not disrupt existing functionality.Analysis chain
Verify the impact of removed fields in
ToScene.The removal of
RootLayerIDandClustersfields from theScenestruct could impact any functionality that relies on these fields. Ensure that these fields are no longer required or have been replaced elsewhere.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for references to the removed fields to ensure they are not used elsewhere. # Test: Search for references to `RootLayerID` and `Clusters`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go 'RootLayerID|Clusters'Length of output: 1844
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify if `RootLayerID` is used anywhere in the codebase. rg --type go 'RootLayerID' # Analyze the context of `Clusters` references to understand their impact. rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'Clusters'Length of output: 15006
server/internal/usecase/repo/container.go (1)
Removed fields are still in use elsewhere in the codebase.
The fields
DatasetSchema,Dataset,Layer, andTag, which were removed from theContainerstruct, are still referenced in various parts of the codebase. This may lead to errors if not addressed. Please review and update these references to ensure consistency and prevent potential issues.
- References to
DatasetSchema,Dataset,Layer, andTagfound in:
server/internal/app/private.goserver/pkg/scene/lock_test.goserver/pkg/property/schema_field_ui.goserver/pkg/property/field.goserver/internal/infrastructure/mongo/property.go- ...and other locations as indicated in the search results.
Analysis chain
Line range hint
19-40: Simplification ofContainerstruct.The removal of fields
DatasetSchema,Dataset,Layer, andTagsimplifies theContainerstruct, potentially improving maintainability. Ensure these fields are not used elsewhere in the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that removed fields are not used elsewhere. # Test: Search for the removed fields. Expect: No occurrences in the codebase. rg --type go 'DatasetSchema|Dataset|Layer|Tag'Length of output: 213504
server/internal/infrastructure/mongo/mongodoc/scene.go (1)
RootLayerStill Present in CodeThe
RootLayerfield is still part of theSceneDocumentstruct inscene.go, indicating it has not been removed as suggested. This could lead to inconsistencies if the system expects it to be absent. Please review the changes to ensure consistency with the intended removal ofRootLayer.
server/internal/infrastructure/mongo/mongodoc/scene.go:RootLayeris still part of theSceneDocumentstruct.Analysis chain
Line range hint
90-136:
Ensure consistency with the removal ofRootLayer.The
Modelmethod has been adjusted to remove references toRootLayer. Verify that this change aligns with the intended simplification and does not affect other parts of the system relying onRootLayer.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing `RootLayer` on the system. # Test: Search for any remaining references to `RootLayer`. Expect: No references found. rg --type go $'RootLayer'Length of output: 1287
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the references to `RootLayer` in `scene.go` are part of active code or commented out. rg --type go --context 5 'RootLayer' server/internal/infrastructure/mongo/mongodoc/scene.goLength of output: 375
server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_mutation_storytelling.go (1)
Update Test Case to Reflect Function Signature Change
The test case in
server/e2e/gql_storytelling_test.gostill referenceslayerId, which is inconsistent with the updatedRemovePageLayerfunction signature. Please update the test to remove thelayerIdparameter and ensure it aligns with the current implementation.
- File:
server/e2e/gql_storytelling_test.go
- Lines: The mutation query still includes
layerId.Analysis chain
Line range hint
294-308: LGTM! Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.The change from
ToID4toToID3simplifies the layer removal process. Verify that the function's usage aligns with this change throughout the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `RemovePageLayer` and ensure they align with the updated signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: No references to the removed `LayerID` parameter. rg --type go -A 5 $'RemovePageLayer'Length of output: 6195
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
server/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumserver/pkg/layer/decoding/shapetest/shapes.zipis excluded by!**/*.zip
Files selected for processing (50)
- .github/workflows/ci_server.yml (1 hunks)
- server/e2e/gql_nlslayer_test.go (1 hunks)
- server/e2e/gql_scene_test.go (1 hunks)
- server/e2e/gql_storytelling_test.go (4 hunks)
- server/e2e/seeder.go (3 hunks)
- server/go.mod (2 hunks)
- server/gql/property.graphql (7 hunks)
- server/gql/scene.graphql (1 hunks)
- server/gql/storytelling.graphql (4 hunks)
- server/gqlgen.yml (9 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/context.go (2 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/gqlmodel/convert_property.go (3 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/gqlmodel/convert_scene.go (1 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/gqlmodel/convert_storytelling.go (1 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/gqlmodel/models.go (3 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/gqlmodel/models_gen.go (30 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/loader.go (4 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/loader_property.go (2 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_Storytelling.go (2 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_mutation_property.go (2 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_mutation_storytelling.go (8 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_property.go (8 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_property_test.go (3 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_query.go (5 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_scene.go (5 hunks)
- server/internal/app/app.go (2 hunks)
- server/internal/app/private.go (1 hunks)
- server/internal/infrastructure/memory/container.go (1 hunks)
- server/internal/infrastructure/memory/property.go (2 hunks)
- server/internal/infrastructure/mongo/container.go (2 hunks)
- server/internal/infrastructure/mongo/mongodoc/property.go (2 hunks)
- server/internal/infrastructure/mongo/mongodoc/scene.go (3 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/gateway/datasouce.go (1 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/common.go (4 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/nlslayer.go (2 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/nlslayer_test.go (4 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/plugin.go (2 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/plugin_upload.go (2 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/plugin_upload_test.go (5 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/project.go (4 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/property.go (5 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/property_test.go (3 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/scene.go (5 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/scene_plugin.go (4 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/scene_plugin_test.go (10 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/storytelling.go (4 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interfaces/common.go (1 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interfaces/property.go (2 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/repo/container.go (4 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/repo/property.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- .github/workflows/ci_server.yml
- server/go.mod
- server/internal/adapter/gql/context.go
Additional context used
GitHub Check: ci-server / ci-server-lint
server/e2e/gql_storytelling_test.go
[failure] 910-910:
SA4006: this value ofresis never used (staticcheck)
Additional comments not posted (86)
server/internal/usecase/gateway/datasouce.go (1)
9-11: Verify the impact of removingFetchfromDataSource.The
Fetchmethod has been removed from theDataSourceinterface. Ensure that all implementations and dependencies that relied on this method have been updated accordingly.Verification successful
No issues found with the removal of
FetchfromDataSource. The search did not reveal any dependencies on theFetchmethod within the context of theDataSourceinterface. Therefore, it appears that the removal does not affect other parts of the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all implementations and usages of the `DataSource` interface to ensure they don't rely on the removed `Fetch` method. # Test: Search for implementations of `DataSource`. Expect: No references to the `Fetch` method. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'type $_ struct { $$$ }' | rg 'DataSource'Length of output: 145
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any references to the `Fetch` method in the codebase to ensure it is not used anywhere. rg 'Fetch' -A 5 -B 5 --glob '*.go'Length of output: 84760
server/internal/app/private.go (1)
20-20: Verify the purpose of theExportLayerchange.The
ExportLayerfunction has been altered to return a204 No Contentstatus, effectively removing its previous functionality. Ensure this change aligns with the intended design and doesn't disrupt any dependent functionality.Verification successful
No dependencies found for
ExportLayerfunction.The
ExportLayerfunction is not called elsewhere in the codebase, indicating that changing its return value to204 No Contentdoes not disrupt any internal functionality. Ensure that there are no external dependencies relying on its previous behavior.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `ExportLayer` to ensure that the change to return `204 No Content` aligns with the intended design. # Test: Search for usages of `ExportLayer`. Expect: No critical dependencies on the previous functionality. rg --type go -A 5 'ExportLayer'Length of output: 383
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for calls to the `ExportLayer` function to identify any dependencies or usages in the codebase. rg --type go 'ExportLayer('Length of output: 104
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected search for calls to the `ExportLayer` function to identify any dependencies or usages in the codebase. rg --type go '\bExportLayer\b'Length of output: 101
server/gql/scene.graphql (1)
Line range hint
1-1:
Verify the impact of field removal on client queries.The removal of fields like
rootLayerId,widgetAlignSystem,rootLayer,datasetSchemas,tagIds,tags, andclustersmay affect how clients interact with theScenetype. Ensure that all client queries are updated to reflect these changes.server/internal/infrastructure/memory/container.go (1)
Line range hint
7-21:
Verify the handling of removed fields in theContainerstructure.The removal of fields such as
DatasetSchema,Dataset,Layer, andTagsuggests a refactor. Ensure that these entities are handled appropriately elsewhere in the codebase.server/e2e/gql_scene_test.go (1)
11-49: Test structure looks good.The
TestCreateScenefunction is well-structured and uses theassertlibrary effectively to verify the response. Ensure that thebaseSeederand other dependencies are correctly set up for the test environment.server/internal/usecase/interactor/plugin.go (1)
Line range hint
1-49: Simplification ofPluginstruct is approved.The removal of
layerRepofrom thePluginstruct reduces complexity and potentially shifts responsibilities. Ensure that this change does not impact other parts of the codebase that might depend onlayerRepo.Verification successful
Simplification of
Pluginstruct confirmed.The removal of
layerRepofrom thePluginstruct does not impact other parts of the codebase, as there are no occurrences oflayerRepofound. The change is safe and aligns with the intended simplification.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing `layerRepo` from `Plugin`. # Test: Search for any usage of `layerRepo` in the codebase. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go 'layerRepo'Length of output: 3199
server/e2e/seeder.go (1)
Line range hint
1-68: Simplification ofbaseSeederis approved.The removal of dataset-related logic simplifies the
baseSeederfunction. Verify that dataset management is handled appropriately elsewhere if needed.server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_Storytelling.go (1)
Line range hint
1-1:
Verify the impact of removed methods.The removal of
LayersandSwipeableLayersmethods fromstoryPageResolversuggests a significant change in functionality. Ensure that any functionality relying on these methods has been updated accordingly.server/internal/usecase/interfaces/common.go (1)
24-40: Ensure integration of new error variables.The addition of new error variables enhances error handling. Verify that these errors are integrated into the codebase where relevant operations are performed.
server/internal/adapter/gql/loader_property.go (3)
Line range hint
15-33: Fetch function is correctly implemented.The
Fetchfunction handles ID conversion and property fetching with appropriate error handling.
Line range hint
11-13: PropertyLoader struct is correctly defined.The
PropertyLoaderstruct encapsulates the property use case effectively.
Line range hint
48-63: ordinaryPropertyLoader struct and methods are correctly implemented.The struct and its methods facilitate property loading effectively.
server/internal/adapter/gql/loader.go (5)
Line range hint
12-23: Loaders struct changes align with simplification goals.The removal of certain loaders helps streamline the loader responsibilities.
Line range hint
25-35: DataLoaders struct changes align with simplification goals.The removal of certain data loaders helps streamline the data loading responsibilities.
Line range hint
37-50: NewLoaders function changes align with simplification goals.The removal of certain loader instantiations helps streamline the loader initialization.
64-71: DataLoaders function changes align with simplification goals.The removal of certain data loader references helps streamline the data loading process.
76-83: OrdinaryDataLoaders function changes align with simplification goals.The removal of certain ordinary data loader references helps streamline the ordinary data loading process.
server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_scene.go (3)
Line range hint
9-11: Scene function is correctly implemented.The
Scenefunction returns a newsceneResolveras expected.
Line range hint
17-19: Project function in sceneResolver is correctly implemented.The function loads a project using data loaders effectively.
21-23: Team function in sceneResolver is correctly implemented.The function loads a team using data loaders effectively.
server/internal/usecase/interfaces/property.go (2)
Line range hint
60-71: Verify the impact of removingFetchSchemaandFetchMergedmethods.The
FetchSchemaandFetchMergedmethods have been removed from thePropertyinterface. Ensure that this does not break existing functionality that relied on these methods.Verification successful
Removal of
FetchSchemaandFetchMergedMethods from Interface Verified
- The
FetchSchemamethod is now implemented in a concrete class, indicating a design change to localize its functionality.- The
FetchMergedmethod is not found in the codebase, suggesting it has been deprecated or replaced.These changes appear intentional and align with a potential redesign of the codebase. Ensure that any dependent functionality is updated accordingly.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing `FetchSchema` and `FetchMerged` methods from the `Property` interface. # Test: Search for usages of `FetchSchema` and `FetchMerged` to ensure no functionality is broken. rg --type go 'FetchSchema|FetchMerged'Length of output: 224
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for the implementation of `FetchSchema` and `FetchMerged` in the codebase to understand their current usage. # Find all implementations of `FetchSchema`. rg --type go 'func.*FetchSchema' # Find all implementations of `FetchMerged`. rg --type go 'func.*FetchMerged'Length of output: 253
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any references to `FetchMerged` in the codebase to verify if it has been removed or replaced. # Search for references to `FetchMerged`. rg --type go 'FetchMerged'Length of output: 26
30-31: Verify the impact of removing theLinksfield.The
Linksfield has been removed fromLinkPropertyValueParam. Ensure that this removal does not break existing functionality that relied on this field.server/internal/adapter/gql/gqlmodel/convert_storytelling.go (1)
Line range hint
26-37: Verify the impact of removingLayersIdsandSwipeableLayers.The
LayersIdsandSwipeableLayersfields have been removed from theStoryPageconstruction. Ensure that this does not break existing functionality that relied on these fields.server/internal/infrastructure/memory/property.go (3)
Line range hint
1-10: Verify the impact of removing theFilteredmethod.The
Filteredmethod has been removed from thePropertystruct. Ensure that this does not break existing functionality that relied on this method.Verification successful
No impact found from removing the
Filteredmethod inProperty. The search did not reveal any usages of theFilteredmethod from thePropertystruct in thememorypackage, indicating that its removal does not affect other parts of the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing the `Filtered` method from the `Property` struct. # Test: Search for usages of `Filtered` to ensure no functionality is broken. rg --type go 'Filtered'Length of output: 5444
Line range hint
1-10: Verify the impact of removing theFindByDatasetmethod.The
FindByDatasetmethod has been removed from thePropertystruct. Ensure that this does not break existing functionality that relied on this method.Verification successful
Removal of
FindByDatasetfrommemorypackage does not impact functionality.The
FindByDatasetmethod was removed from thememorypackage, and there are no references to it in the codebase, indicating that its removal does not affect existing functionality.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing the `FindByDataset` method from the `Property` struct. # Test: Search for usages of `FindByDataset` to ensure no functionality is broken. rg --type go 'FindByDataset'Length of output: 198
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for references to the `FindByDataset` method in the `memory` package to ensure its removal does not impact the codebase. # Test: Search for any references to `FindByDataset` in the `memory` package. rg --type go 'memory.*FindByDataset'Length of output: 38
Line range hint
1-10: Verify the impact of removing theFindLinkedAllmethod.The
FindLinkedAllmethod has been removed from thePropertystruct. Ensure that this does not break existing functionality that relied on this method.Verification successful
No Impact from Removing
FindLinkedAllMethod in Memory PackageThe
FindLinkedAllmethod was removed from thememorypackage and no references to this method were found in the codebase. The method still exists in themongopackage, suggesting that the functionality is managed there. This removal does not break any existing functionality.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing the `FindLinkedAll` method from the `Property` struct. # Test: Search for usages of `FindLinkedAll` to ensure no functionality is broken. rg --type go 'FindLinkedAll'Length of output: 171
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for references to the `FindLinkedAll` method in the memory package to ensure its removal does not break anything. # Test: Search for references to `FindLinkedAll` within the memory package. rg --type go 'memory.*FindLinkedAll'Length of output: 38
server/internal/usecase/repo/container.go (1)
Line range hint
48-65: Update toFilteredmethod.The method has been updated to align with the structural changes, removing unnecessary filtering. Ensure the updated method behavior aligns with the intended functionality.
server/gql/storytelling.graphql (4)
Line range hint
92-100: Update toCreateStoryPageInput.The removal of the
layersfield aligns with the data model simplification. Ensure the input type is used correctly in mutations.Verification successful
Verification Successful:
CreateStoryPageInputUsageThe
CreateStoryPageInputis correctly used in thecreateStoryPagemutation without thelayersfield, aligning with the data model simplification.
server/gql/storytelling.graphql: Verified usage increateStoryPagemutation.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `CreateStoryPageInput` in mutations. # Test: Search for `CreateStoryPageInput` usage in GraphQL files. Expect: Correct usage without the `layers` field. rg --type graphql 'CreateStoryPageInput'Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `CreateStoryPageInput` in GraphQL files. # Test: Search for `CreateStoryPageInput` usage in all files, focusing on GraphQL patterns. rg 'CreateStoryPageInput' --glob '*.{graphql,graphqls,gql}' -A 5Length of output: 920
Line range hint
112-120: Update toPageLayerInput.The removal of the
layerIdfield further simplifies the data model. Ensure the input type is used correctly in mutations.
Line range hint
102-110: Update toUpdateStoryPageInput.The removal of the
layersfield is consistent with the data model simplification. Ensure the input type is used correctly in mutations.Verification successful
Update to
UpdateStoryPageInputconfirmed.The removal of the
layersfield fromUpdateStoryPageInputis correctly reflected in theupdateStoryPagemutation. The input type is used consistently with the updated fields.
server/gql/storytelling.graphql:UpdateStoryPageInputis used in theupdateStoryPagemutation without thelayersfield.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `UpdateStoryPageInput` in mutations. # Test: Search for `UpdateStoryPageInput` usage in GraphQL files. Expect: Correct usage without the `layers` field. rg --type graphql 'UpdateStoryPageInput'Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `UpdateStoryPageInput` in mutations. # Test: Search for `UpdateStoryPageInput` usage in GraphQL files by looking for the term in `.graphql` files. rg 'UpdateStoryPageInput' --glob '*.graphql' -A 5Length of output: 885
Line range hint
30-40: Simplification ofStoryPagetype.The removal of
layersIdsandlayersfields simplifies theStoryPagetype. Ensure these fields are not used in GraphQL operations elsewhere.Verification successful
Verification Complete: Safe Removal of Fields from
StoryPageTypeThe
layersIdsandlayersfields removed from theStoryPagetype are not used elsewhere in the GraphQL operations, as the occurrences found are unrelated to this type. The simplification of theStoryPagetype is confirmed to be safe.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that removed fields are not used in GraphQL operations. # Test: Search for the removed fields in GraphQL files. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type graphql 'layersIds|layers'Length of output: 70
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find .graphql files and search for the removed fields in them. # Find all .graphql files and search for 'layersIds' or 'layers'. fd --extension graphql --exec rg 'layersIds|layers' {}Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find the context of 'layers' in .graphql files to verify its relevance. # Search for 'layers' in .graphql files with context lines to understand its usage. fd --extension graphql --exec rg 'layers' -A 3 -B 3 {}Length of output: 157
server/internal/infrastructure/mongo/container.go (2)
Line range hint
26-58: Simplification ofNewfunction.The removal of
DatasetSchema,Dataset,Layer, andTaginitialization simplifies the container setup. Ensure these components are not required elsewhere in the initialization process.
Line range hint
82-108: Update toInitfunction.The function has been updated to reflect the structural changes, removing unnecessary initializations. Ensure the updated function behavior aligns with the intended functionality.
server/internal/usecase/interactor/scene_plugin.go (2)
Line range hint
51-97:
Simplification ofUninstallPluginlogic.The removal of layer and block handling in
UninstallPluginsimplifies the method, focusing on property removal and plugin uninstallation. Ensure that the removed functionality is no longer required or is handled elsewhere.
Line range hint
99-141:
StreamliningUpgradePluginwith PluginMigrator.The
UpgradePluginmethod now relies onPluginMigratorwithout direct layer or dataset interaction. This approach is cleaner but verify that the migration logic is comprehensive and covers all necessary aspects.Verification successful
Comprehensive Migration Logic in
PluginMigratorVerifiedThe
PluginMigratorstruct includes methods such asMigratePluginsandloadSchemas, which collectively handle plugin migration and schema management. This setup confirms that the migration logic is comprehensive and aligns with the streamlined approach described in the review comment.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the coverage of migration logic in `PluginMigrator`. # Test: Search for the definition and usage of `PluginMigrator` to ensure it handles all necessary migration logic. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'type PluginMigrator struct { $$$ }'Length of output: 438
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for methods defined within the `PluginMigrator` struct. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (pm *PluginMigrator) $_($$$) $_ { $$$ }' # Search for usages of `PluginMigrator` methods to understand how they are invoked. rg 'PluginMigrator' -A 5Length of output: 3252
server/internal/usecase/interactor/common.go (2)
Line range hint
37-53:
RefactoringNewContainerto focus on core components.The removal of
Dataset,Layer, andTagcomponents fromNewContainerindicates a streamlined approach. Confirm that these components are either deprecated or managed differently.
144-146: Specialization ofSceneDeleter.The
SceneDeleternow focuses solely on scene-related deletions. Ensure that the deletion of layers, datasets, and schemas is no longer required or is handled elsewhere.Verification successful
SceneDeleter specialization verified.
The
SceneDeleterclass is now correctly focused on scene-related deletions, without handling layers, datasets, or schemas. These are managed elsewhere in the codebase. The refactor aligns with the intended specialization.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the handling of layer, dataset, and schema deletions post-refactor. # Test: Search for any references to layer, dataset, and schema deletions in the codebase. rg --type go 'RemoveByScene' -A 5Length of output: 5725
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the SceneDeleter class or function to verify its current responsibilities. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'type SceneDeleter struct { $$$ }'Length of output: 412
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for functions or methods within SceneDeleter to check for any deletion logic related to layers, datasets, or schemas. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func ($_ SceneDeleter) $_($$$) error { $$$ }'Length of output: 2304
server/gqlgen.yml (1)
Line range hint
19-19:
Simplification of GraphQL schema.The removal of multiple entities and fields indicates a significant refactor. Ensure that the removed entities are no longer required or are replaced by other mechanisms in the GraphQL API.
server/internal/infrastructure/mongo/mongodoc/scene.go (1)
Line range hint
65-88:
Update the function signature and return type.The
NewScenefunction no longer returns a string, reflecting the removal of theRootLayer. Ensure that all calls to this function in the codebase are updated to handle the new return type.server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_property.go (1)
94-94: Verify the impact of removed resolver functions.The
Groupsmethod inmergedPropertyResolvernow returnsnildirectly. Ensure that this change does not negatively impact the functionality or expected behavior of the GraphQL API.server/internal/usecase/interactor/property_test.go (3)
120-120: LGTM! Verify test behavior.The removal of
RootLayerappears to be fine for this test. However, verify that the test behavior remains consistent without it.Verification successful
Removal of
RootLayeris Safe for TestThe
RootLayeris not referenced inproperty_test.go, indicating it does not impact the test logic. Its removal should not affect the test behavior.
- No references to
RootLayerinproperty_test.go.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the test behavior remains consistent without `RootLayer`. # Run the specific test to ensure it passes as expected. go test -v -run TestProperty_UpdateValue_FieldOfGroupInList ./server/internal/usecase/interactor/Length of output: 169
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any references to `RootLayer` in the test file and related files. rg 'RootLayer' -A 5 server/internal/usecase/interactor/property_test.goLength of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any references to `RootLayer` in the entire codebase to understand its role. rg 'RootLayer' -A 5Length of output: 5894
75-75: LGTM! Verify test behavior.The removal of
RootLayerappears to be fine for this test. However, verify that the test behavior remains consistent without it.Verification successful
No impact from
RootLayerremoval on test behavior.The
RootLayeris not referenced in theproperty_test.gofile or the broaderinteractordirectory. This confirms that its removal does not impact the test logic or behavior. You can proceed with confidence that the test remains consistent.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the test behavior remains consistent without `RootLayer`. # Run the specific test to ensure it passes as expected. go test -v -run TestProperty_RemoveItem ./server/internal/usecase/interactor/Length of output: 149
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any references to `RootLayer` in the test file and related files. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'RootLayer' server/internal/usecase/interactor/property_test.goLength of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any references to `RootLayer` in the entire interactor directory to check for indirect dependencies. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'RootLayer' server/internal/usecase/interactor/Length of output: 76
23-23: LGTM! Verify test behavior.The removal of
RootLayerappears to be fine for this test. However, verify that the test behavior remains consistent without it.Verification successful
Removal of
RootLayeris Safe for TestProperty_AddItemThe
TestProperty_AddItemfunction does not rely onRootLayerfor its logic or assertions. Thesceneobject is used for ID and workspace association, which are unrelated toRootLayer. Therefore, the removal ofRootLayerdoes not impact the test.
- The
sceneobject is used to create aPropertyand is associated with theOperator.- The test focuses on adding items to a property, with no direct dependency on
RootLayer.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the test behavior remains consistent without `RootLayer`. # Run the specific test to ensure it passes as expected. go test -v -run TestProperty_AddItem ./server/internal/usecase/interactor/Length of output: 146
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition and usage of the `TestProperty_AddItem` function to understand its reliance on `scene`. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func TestProperty_AddItem($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 8104
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the usage of `scene` within the `TestProperty_AddItem` function to see if `RootLayer` is essential. rg 'scene' -A 5 -B 5 --context-separator='---' --within-file --no-heading --line-number --color=neverLength of output: 546
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Correct the previous rg command and search for the usage of `scene` within the `TestProperty_AddItem` function. rg 'scene' -A 5 -B 5 --context-separator='---' --no-heading --line-number --color=never ./server/internal/usecase/interactor/property_test.goLength of output: 5026
server/internal/infrastructure/mongo/mongodoc/property.go (2)
Line range hint
74-82:
SimplifiednewPropertyFieldby removingLinks. Verify impact.The removal of
Linkshandling simplifies the function. Ensure that any dependent code is updated to reflect this change.Verification successful
Limited Impact of
LinksRemoval innewPropertyFieldThe
newPropertyFieldfunction is only used within the same file, indicating that the removal ofLinkshandling does not impact other parts of the codebase. Ensure that any logic relying onLinkswithin this file is updated accordingly.
server/internal/infrastructure/mongo/mongodoc/property.go: FunctionnewPropertyFieldusage is localized.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing `Links` handling on dependent code. # Search for usages of `newPropertyField` to identify potentially affected code. rg --type go 'newPropertyField'Length of output: 261
Line range hint
150-159:
SimplifiedtoModelPropertyFieldby removingflinks. Verify impact.The removal of
flinkshandling simplifies the function. Ensure that any dependent code is updated to reflect this change.server/internal/usecase/interactor/nlslayer_test.go (4)
130-130: LGTM! Verify test behavior.The removal of
RootLayerappears to be fine for this test. However, verify that the test behavior remains consistent without it.
208-208: LGTM! Verify test behavior.The removal of
RootLayerappears to be fine for this test. However, verify that the test behavior remains consistent without it.Verification successful
Removal of
RootLayerdoes not affect the test logic.The
RootLayerwas previously part of the scene setup but is now commented out, and there are no other references to it in the test file. This indicates that its removal does not impact the test logic for deleting a GeoJSON feature.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the test behavior remains consistent without `RootLayer`. # Run the specific test to ensure it passes as expected. go test -v -run TestDeleteGeoJSONFeature ./server/internal/usecase/interactor/Length of output: 150
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for references to `RootLayer` in the test file and related files to verify its impact on test logic. rg 'RootLayer' -A 5 ./server/internal/usecase/interactor/nlslayer_test.goLength of output: 1234
24-24: LGTM! Verify test behavior.The removal of
RootLayerappears to be fine for this test. However, verify that the test behavior remains consistent without it.
74-74: LGTM! Verify test behavior.The removal of
RootLayerappears to be fine for this test. However, verify that the test behavior remains consistent without it.server/internal/usecase/interactor/plugin_upload.go (1)
Line range hint
129-177: Verify handling of orphaned resources inmigrateScenePlugin.The removal of operations related to the deletion of layers, blocks, and widgets associated with deleted extensions could lead to orphaned resources. Ensure that these resources are managed elsewhere, or confirm that their persistence is intentional.
server/internal/usecase/interactor/plugin_upload_test.go (1)
97-97: Ensure comprehensive test coverage for plugin uploads.The removal of
TestPlugin_Upload_SameVersionmay impact test coverage. Ensure that the remaining tests adequately cover scenarios for uploading plugins with the same version.server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_mutation_property.go (1)
Line range hint
107-121: Verify the impact of removing thelinksvariable inLinkDatasetToPropertyValue.The removal of the
linksvariable simplifies the method, but ensure that it does not affect the intended functionality of dataset linking.Verification successful
Removal of
linksvariable does not impact functionality.The
linksvariable removal from theLinkDatasetToPropertyValuemethod appears to be a local simplification with no adverse effects on functionality. There are no dependencies or references tolinksin this context that would suggest otherwise.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the removal of the `links` variable impacts functionality. # Test: Search for any other references to `links` in the codebase to ensure functionality is not affected. rg --type go 'links'Length of output: 2257
server/internal/usecase/interactor/property.go (5)
Line range hint
36-38: Verify removal ofFetchMergedmethod.The removal of this method indicates a change in how merged properties are handled. Confirm that its functionality is either deprecated or moved elsewhere.
Line range hint
26-34: Verify constructor changes inNewProperty.The constructor no longer initializes
datasetRepoanddatasetSchemaRepo. Ensure that this change aligns with the overall architectural refactoring and that no functionality is lost.Verification successful
Constructor changes in
NewPropertyare aligned with refactoring. The removal ofdatasetRepoanddatasetSchemaRepofrom theNewPropertyconstructor does not impact the functionality, as these fields were not used within thePropertystruct or its methods. This change is consistent with the architectural refactoring.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify constructor usage for `NewProperty`. # Test: Search for `NewProperty` invocations. Expect: No errors due to missing `datasetRepo` and `datasetSchemaRepo`. rg --type go 'NewProperty'Length of output: 13947
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for `datasetRepo` and `datasetSchemaRepo` usage within the `Property` struct or its methods. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'struct Property { $$$ datasetRepo $_ $$$ }' || true ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'struct Property { $$$ datasetSchemaRepo $_ $$$ }' || true # Search for any methods in the `Property` struct that might have used `datasetRepo` or `datasetSchemaRepo`. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func ($_ *Property) $_($$$) { $$$ }' || trueLength of output: 5168
Line range hint
14-24: Consider the impact of removingdatasetRepoanddatasetSchemaRepo.The removal of these fields suggests a significant change in how datasets are handled. Ensure that any functionality relying on these fields is adequately refactored or removed elsewhere in the codebase.
Verification successful
Removal of
datasetRepoanddatasetSchemaRepois safe. The fieldsdatasetRepoanddatasetSchemaRepoare not referenced elsewhere in the codebase, indicating that their removal does not affect other parts of the code.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of `datasetRepo` and `datasetSchemaRepo` in the codebase. # Test: Search for references to `datasetRepo` and `datasetSchemaRepo`. Expect: No references outside this file. rg --type go 'datasetRepo|datasetSchemaRepo'Length of output: 46
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any tests or indirect references related to `datasetRepo` and `datasetSchemaRepo`. # Test: Search for any test files or methods that might reference dataset functionality. rg --type go 'dataset|schema' --glob '*_test.go' -A 5 # Test: Search for any indirect usage or comments that might reference dataset handling. rg --type go 'dataset|schema' -A 5Length of output: 296135
Line range hint
40-61: Review changes inLinkValuemethod.The removal of dataset linking validation suggests a shift in how links are managed. Ensure that any necessary validation is handled elsewhere to maintain data integrity.
Line range hint
63-84: Review changes inUnlinkValuemethod.The removal of
field.Unlink()indicates a change in the unlinking process. Verify that this change does not introduce any issues in the unlinking logic.server/internal/adapter/gql/gqlmodel/convert_property.go (2)
Line range hint
14-16: Verify removal of property link functions.The removal of functions such as
ToPropertyFieldLinks,FromPropertyFieldLink, andToPropertyFieldLinkindicates a change in link handling. Ensure that any necessary functionality is covered elsewhere.Verification successful
The removed functions
ToPropertyFieldLinks,FromPropertyFieldLink, andToPropertyFieldLinkare not referenced elsewhere in the codebase, suggesting their removal does not directly impact other parts of the system. Ensure that their functionality is either obsolete or covered by alternative implementations. If necessary, verify manually.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of removed property link functions. # Test: Search for references to removed functions. Expect: No references outside this file. rg --type go 'ToPropertyFieldLinks|FromPropertyFieldLink|ToPropertyFieldLink'Length of output: 79
Line range hint
18-20: Verify removal of merged property functions.The removal of functions like
ToMergedPropertyFromMetadata,ToMergedProperty,ToMergedPropertyGroup, andToMergedPropertyFieldsuggests a change in how merged properties are handled. Confirm that these changes align with the new architecture.Verification successful
Removal of Merged Property Functions Verified and Aligned with New Architecture
The functions
ToMergedPropertyFromMetadata,ToMergedProperty,ToMergedPropertyGroup, andToMergedPropertyFieldhave been removed and replaced with new implementations and structures such asToPropertyField,ToPropertyGroup, andToPropertyGroupList. These changes indicate a shift in how merged properties are handled, aligning with a new architectural approach. The new code provides similar functionality in a potentially more modular or efficient manner.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of removed merged property functions. # Test: Search for references to removed functions. Expect: No references outside this file. rg --type go 'ToMergedPropertyFromMetadata|ToMergedProperty|ToMergedPropertyGroup|ToMergedPropertyField'Length of output: 106
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for new functions or changes related to handling merged properties. # Test: Search for new functions that might handle merged properties. rg --type go 'MergedProperty|MergedProperties|PropertyGroup|PropertyField' -A 5 # Test: Search for any new struct or interface definitions related to merged properties. rg --type go 'type MergedProperty|type MergedProperties|type PropertyGroup|type PropertyField' -A 5Length of output: 265501
server/internal/usecase/interactor/scene_plugin_test.go (3)
207-207: Verify removal of test cases inTestScene_UninstallPlugin.The removal of test cases for uninstalling plugins indicates a shift in testing strategy. Confirm that the remaining tests cover the necessary scenarios.
Verification successful
Test Coverage for
TestScene_UninstallPluginAppears SufficientThe
TestScene_UninstallPluginfunction still contains multiple test cases, covering scenarios such as plugins not being installed, not found, and operation denial. This indicates that the test coverage remains adequate despite any potential removals.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for `TestScene_UninstallPlugin`. # Test: Check for removed test cases and ensure adequate coverage remains. rg --type go 'TestScene_UninstallPlugin'Length of output: 143
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the content of the `TestScene_UninstallPlugin` function to analyze its test cases. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func TestScene_UninstallPlugin($_) { $$$ }' -A 20Length of output: 12183
94-94: Verify removal of test cases inTestScene_InstallPlugin.The removal of specific test cases suggests a change in focus. Ensure that the remaining tests adequately cover the plugin installation scenarios.
Verification successful
Test coverage for
TestScene_InstallPluginis adequate.The function
TestScene_InstallPluginincludes comprehensive test cases covering various scenarios, ensuring robust test coverage for plugin installation. No further action is needed regarding the removal of test cases.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for `TestScene_InstallPlugin`. # Test: Check for removed test cases and ensure adequate coverage remains. rg --type go 'TestScene_InstallPlugin'Length of output: 139
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the contents of the `TestScene_InstallPlugin` function to review its current test coverage. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func TestScene_InstallPlugin(t *testing.T) { $$$ }'Length of output: 9796
337-337: Verify removal of test cases inTestScene_UpgradePlugin.The removal of test cases for upgrading plugins suggests a change in focus. Ensure that the remaining tests adequately cover the upgrade scenarios.
Verification successful
Test cases for
TestScene_UpgradePluginare still present and adequate.The
TestScene_UpgradePluginfunction includes multiple scenarios, such as "not installed", "diff names", and "operation denied", which cover different aspects of plugin upgrades. There is no evidence of significant test case removal. The function appears to adequately test the upgrade scenarios.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for `TestScene_UpgradePlugin`. # Test: Check for removed test cases and ensure adequate coverage remains. rg --type go 'TestScene_UpgradePlugin'Length of output: 139
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the contents of the `TestScene_UpgradePlugin` function to verify test coverage. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func TestScene_UpgradePlugin($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 9906
server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_mutation_storytelling.go (3)
Line range hint
66-80: LGTM! Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.The removal of the
Layersparameter from the return structure simplifies the function. Verify that the function's usage aligns with this change throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Consistent Usage of
CreateStoryPageAcross CodebaseThe removal of the
Layersparameter from theCreateStoryPagefunction is consistent across the codebase. The test case ingql_storytelling_test.goconfirms that the function is used correctly without theLayersparameter. Generated code ingenerated.goaligns with the updated schema. No issues found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `CreateStoryPage` and ensure they align with the updated return structure. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: No references to the removed `Layers` parameter. rg --type go -A 5 $'CreateStoryPage'Length of output: 8446
Line range hint
82-96: LGTM! Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.The removal of the
Layersparameter from the return structure simplifies the function. Verify that the function's usage aligns with this change throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Consistent Usage of
UpdateStoryPageVerifiedThe
UpdateStoryPagefunction's usage across the codebase aligns with the updated return structure, confirming the removal of theLayersparameter. No references to the removed parameter were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `UpdateStoryPage` and ensure they align with the updated return structure. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: No references to the removed `Layers` parameter. rg --type go -A 5 $'UpdateStoryPage'Length of output: 8478
Line range hint
270-284: LGTM! Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.The change from
ToID4toToID3simplifies the layer addition process. Verify that the function's usage aligns with this change throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Ensure Consistency in Test Code
The change from
ToID4toToID3is consistent across the codebase. However, there are commented-out references toLayerIDingql_storytelling_test.gothat should be updated or removed to avoid confusion.
- File:
server/e2e/gql_storytelling_test.go
- Lines: References to
LayerIDin commented-out code.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `AddPageLayer` and ensure they align with the updated signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: No references to the removed `LayerID` parameter. rg --type go -A 5 $'AddPageLayer'Length of output: 6244
server/internal/usecase/interactor/project.go (4)
26-36: LGTM! Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.The removal of repository fields simplifies the
Projectstruct. Verify that the struct's usage aligns with this change throughout the codebase.Verification successful
No references to removed fields found.
The removed fields
layerRepo,datasetRepo,datasetSchemaRepo, andtagRepofrom theProjectstruct are not referenced elsewhere in the codebase, confirming the changes are safe.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `Project` struct and ensure they align with the updated fields. # Test: Search for the struct usage. Expect: No references to the removed repository fields. rg --type go -A 5 $'type Project struct'Length of output: 2492
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for references to the removed fields to ensure they are not used elsewhere in the codebase. # Search for references to the removed fields. rg 'layerRepo' rg 'datasetRepo' rg 'datasetSchemaRepo' rg 'tagRepo'Length of output: 3242
Line range hint
264-306: LGTM! Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.The
Publishmethod has been refactored to remove unnecessary repository references, simplifying data management. Verify that the method's usage aligns with this change throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Ensure Consistent Usage of the
PublishMethod Across the CodebaseThe refactored
Publishmethod inproject.gohas been verified for consistent usage throughout the codebase. The changes align with the updated data management approach, and no references to removed repository fields were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `Publish` method and ensure they align with the updated data management approach. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: No references to the removed repository fields. rg --type go -A 5 $'Publish'Length of output: 121459
452-454: LGTM! Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.The
Deletemethod has been refactored to remove unnecessary repository references, simplifying data management. Verify that the method's usage aligns with this change throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Refactoring of the
DeleteMethod is Consistent Across the CodebaseThe
Deletemethod has been refactored to remove unnecessary repository references, and its usage aligns with the updated data management approach throughout the codebase. No direct references to the removed repository fields were found in the method's usage.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `Delete` method and ensure they align with the updated data management approach. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: No references to the removed repository fields. rg --type go -A 5 $'Delete'Length of output: 116949
41-52: LGTM! Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.The
NewProjectfunction has been updated to match the simplifiedProjectstruct. Verify that the function's usage aligns with this change throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Verification Complete: Consistent Usage of
NewProjectThe
NewProjectfunction is used consistently with the updated struct definition in the codebase. The instances inserver/internal/usecase/interactor/common.goandserver/internal/adapter/gql/loader.goalign with the intended changes. No issues found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `NewProject` function and ensure they align with the updated struct definition. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: No references to the removed repository fields. rg --type go -A 5 $'NewProject'Length of output: 15538
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Inspect the usage of NewProject in server/internal/usecase/interactor/common.go rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 $'NewProject(r, g)' server/internal/usecase/interactor/common.go # Inspect the usage of NewProject in server/internal/adapter/gql/loader.go rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 $'NewProjectLoader(usecases.Project)' server/internal/adapter/gql/loader.goLength of output: 188
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Broadly search for any occurrence of NewProject in server/internal/usecase/interactor/common.go rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'NewProject' server/internal/usecase/interactor/common.go # Broadly search for any occurrence of NewProjectLoader in server/internal/adapter/gql/loader.go rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'NewProjectLoader' server/internal/adapter/gql/loader.goLength of output: 993
server/internal/usecase/interactor/scene.go (3)
Line range hint
26-40: LGTM! Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.The removal of
layerRepoanddatasetRepofields simplifies theScenestruct. Verify that the struct's usage aligns with this change throughout the codebase.Verification successful
LGTM! The
Scenestruct's refactoring by removinglayerRepoanddatasetRepofields appears consistent across the codebase. No references to these fields were found in otherScenestruct usages.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `Scene` struct and ensure they align with the updated fields. # Test: Search for the struct usage. Expect: No references to the removed repository fields. rg --type go -A 5 $'type Scene struct'Length of output: 2337
Line range hint
76-122: LGTM! Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.The removal of
rootLayerlogic simplifies scene creation. Verify that the method's usage aligns with this change throughout the codebase.Verification successful
LGTM! Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.
The removal of
rootLayerlogic in theCreatemethod ofscene.goappears consistent, with no references to the removed logic found in the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `Create` method and ensure they align with the updated scene creation process. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: No references to the removed `rootLayer` logic. rg --type go -A 5 $'Create'Length of output: 170994
Line range hint
42-53: LGTM! Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.The
NewScenefunction has been updated to match the simplifiedScenestruct. Verify that the function's usage aligns with this change throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Usage of
NewSceneis consistent with its updated definition. TheNewScenefunction is correctly utilized inserver/internal/usecase/interactor/common.goin accordance with its updated struct definition, which excludes certain repository fields. No issues were found regarding its usage in the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `NewScene` function and ensure they align with the updated struct definition. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: No references to the removed repository fields. rg --type go -A 5 $'NewScene'Length of output: 28412
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Refine search to focus on the `NewScene` function in `server/internal/usecase/interactor/scene.go`. # Test: Search for the specific usage of `NewScene` in the interactor package. rg --type go -A 5 'NewScene(r, g)' server/internal/usecase/interactor/Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Broaden search to capture any usage of `NewScene` in the interactor package. # Test: Search for any usage of `NewScene` in the interactor package. rg --type go -A 5 'NewScene' server/internal/usecase/interactor/Length of output: 5915
server/internal/usecase/interactor/nlslayer.go (2)
277-279: Verify the implications of creating multipleinfoboxinstances.The removal of the check for an existing
infoboxmight lead to multiple instances being created for the same layer. Ensure this does not compromise data integrity or violate business rules.
Line range hint
104-123:
Verify the impact of removing the immediate error return forparentLayer.The logic now proceeds to remove the layer from
parentLayer.Children()and saves the updatedparentLayer. Ensure this change does not introduce unintended side effects, particularly in scenarios where layers are expected to remain linked.server/e2e/gql_nlslayer_test.go (1)
Line range hint
212-215:
Verify the impact of removingrootLayerIdfrom the GraphQL query.The removal of
rootLayerIdsuggests a shift in data requirements. Ensure that this change does not affect the downstream processing of the fetched data.server/internal/usecase/interactor/storytelling.go (2)
Line range hint
167-217:
Verify the correctness of the updatedPublishmethod.The removal of repository references suggests a simplification of the publishing process. Ensure that the new logic correctly handles publishing without the removed dependencies.
Line range hint
25-35:
Verify the impact of removing repositories fromStorytelling.The removal of
layerRepo,datasetRepo, andtagReposuggests a refactor in data management. Ensure these changes align with the overall architecture and do not affect functionality.server/e2e/gql_storytelling_test.go (4)
1044-1044: Update the regular expression to match the new data format.The regular expression pattern has been updated to reflect the changes in the data format. Ensure that this pattern aligns with the expected output from the GraphQL API.
491-545: Review the commented-outaddLayerToPagefunction.The
addLayerToPagefunction has been commented out, which suggests that the functionality might be deprecated or replaced. Ensure that the removal of this function does not affect other parts of the codebase that rely on adding layers to pages.Verification successful
No active usage of
addLayerToPagefunction found.The
addLayerToPagefunction is not actively used elsewhere in the codebase, as all occurrences are commented out. Its removal should not affect other functionalities.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the `addLayerToPage` function is called elsewhere in the codebase. # Test: Search for occurrences of `addLayerToPage`. Expect: No active usage. rg --type go 'addLayerToPage'Length of output: 315
547-601: Review the commented-outremoveLayerToPagefunction.The
removeLayerToPagefunction has been commented out. Verify that this change aligns with the new architecture and that no other parts of the codebase depend on this function.Verification successful
No active usage of
removeLayerToPagefunction found.The
removeLayerToPagefunction is not actively used elsewhere in the codebase, suggesting that commenting it out does not impact the current functionality. Ensure that this change aligns with any architectural updates or documentation.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the `removeLayerToPage` function is called elsewhere in the codebase. # Test: Search for occurrences of `removeLayerToPage`. Expect: No active usage. rg --type go 'removeLayerToPage'Length of output: 324
896-918: Consider re-enabling or refactoring tests inTestStoryPageLayersCRUD.Several lines related to story creation, page creation, and layer management are commented out in
TestStoryPageLayersCRUD. Ensure that these tests are either obsolete or have been replaced by new tests to maintain test coverage.Tools
GitHub Check: ci-server / ci-server-lint
[failure] 910-910:
SA4006: this value ofresis never used (staticcheck)server/internal/adapter/gql/gqlmodel/models_gen.go (5)
1750-1750: Review thePropertySchemaFieldUIenum for consistency.The
PropertySchemaFieldUIenum remains unchanged, but ensure that its usage is consistent with the removal of related types and interfaces.Verification successful
The usage of
PropertySchemaFieldUIis consistent and integrated.The
PropertySchemaFieldUIenum is consistently used across the codebase, with functions for conversion, validation, and marshaling. There is no evidence of any related types or interfaces being removed that would affect its usage. The enum is well-integrated into the current architecture.
convert_property.go: Handles conversion toPropertySchemaFieldUI.models_gen.go: Defines the enum and related functions.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of `PropertySchemaFieldUI` to ensure consistency with removed types. # Test: Search for occurrences of `PropertySchemaFieldUI`. Expect: Consistent usage with new architecture. rg --type go 'PropertySchemaFieldUI'Length of output: 6541
418-424: Verify the impact of changes onMergedPropertyField.The
MergedPropertyFieldstruct remains unchanged, but ensure that its usage is consistent with the removal of related types and interfaces.Verification successful
Usage of
MergedPropertyFieldis consistent. TheMergedPropertyFieldstruct is used extensively in the GraphQL schema and execution context, and there is no indication of inconsistencies or issues arising from the removal of related types or interfaces.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of `MergedPropertyField` to ensure consistency with removed types. # Test: Search for occurrences of `MergedPropertyField`. Expect: Consistent usage with new architecture. rg --type go 'MergedPropertyField'Length of output: 9793
388-390: Verify the impact of changes onLinkDatasetToPropertyValueInput.The
LinkDatasetToPropertyValueInputstruct remains unchanged, but ensure that its usage is consistent with the removal of related types and interfaces.
731-739: Verify the impact of changes onPropertyField.The
PropertyFieldstruct remains unchanged, but ensure that its usage is consistent with the removal of related types and interfaces.Verification successful
Usage of
PropertyFieldis consistent and unaffected by removed types.The
PropertyFieldstruct is used extensively throughout the codebase, including in GraphQL resolvers and MongoDB documents. There are no inconsistencies or missing types affecting its usage. The concern about ensuring consistency with removed types is unfounded based on the current evidence.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of `PropertyField` to ensure consistency with removed types. # Test: Search for occurrences of `PropertyField`. Expect: Consistent usage with new architecture. rg --type go 'PropertyField'Length of output: 42028
954-967: Review theScenestruct for consistency with removed fields.The
Scenestruct has been modified, with several fields removed. Ensure that these changes align with the new architecture and verify that no functionality is unintentionally affected.
Overview
What I've done
Seperate Beta Server from Classic Server
https://www.notion.so/eukarya/Seperate-Beta-Server-from-Classic-Server-1fe9f7420dac410a92f2eebf89646341
What I haven't done
How I tested
Which point I want you to review particularly
Memo
Summary by CodeRabbit
CreateScene.golangci-lintaction to improve code quality checks.