-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(server): remove redundant scene property #1038
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for reearth-web ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
WalkthroughThe recent changes reflect a significant refactoring of the codebase, focusing on simplifying data models, reducing unnecessary functionality, and enhancing clarity. Key alterations include the removal of various fields and functions across multiple components, indicating a shift in how properties, scenes, and layers are managed. Additionally, updates to tests and workflows signify an overall commitment to improving code quality and maintainability. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant API
participant Service
participant Database
User->>API: Request to create a scene
API->>Service: Validate request and process
Service->>Database: Save scene data
Database-->>Service: Confirm save
Service-->>API: Return scene ID
API-->>User: Respond with scene ID
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (6)
server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_property_test.go (1)
11-12
: Insufficient Test Coverage forTest_actualValue
The
Test_actualValue
function currently includes only one test case, "Overridden value". To ensure adequate test coverage, consider adding more test cases to cover different scenarios, such as when the value is not overridden, edge cases, and potential error scenarios. This will help ensure the robustness of the function.Analysis chain
LGTM! But verify test coverage.
The simplification of the
Test_actualValue
function looks good. Ensure that the test coverage remains adequate despite the removal of fields and assertions.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the test coverage for `Test_actualValue` to ensure it remains adequate. # Test: Check for other test cases related to `actualValue`. Expect: Adequate coverage of different scenarios. rg --type go -A 5 'Test_actualValue'Length of output: 476
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract more lines from the `Test_actualValue` function to analyze test coverage. rg --type go -A 20 'func Test_actualValue' server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_property_test.goLength of output: 419
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract more lines from the `Test_actualValue` function to capture all test cases and assertions. rg --type go -A 40 'func Test_actualValue' server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_property_test.goLength of output: 531
server/internal/usecase/repo/property.go (1)
Verify the impact of method removal on dependent code.
The methods
Filtered
,FindLinkedAll
, andFindByDataset
are still present in the codebase and appear to be used in various files. Their removal from theProperty
interface could lead to issues if not addressed. Please ensure that all dependent code is updated or refactored accordingly.
- Files with potential issues:
server/internal/infrastructure/mongo/property.go
- Various files using the
Filtered
methodAnalysis chain
Line range hint
10-20
:
Verify the impact of method removal on dependent code.The removal of methods such as
Filtered
,FindLinkedAll
, andFindByDataset
from theProperty
interface may affect dependent code. Ensure that all code relying on these methods is updated or refactored.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of removed methods in the codebase. # Test: Search for the removed methods in the codebase. Expect: No occurrences of these methods in dependent code. rg --type go 'Filtered|FindLinkedAll|FindByDataset'Length of output: 5787
server/internal/adapter/gql/gqlmodel/convert_scene.go (1)
48-55
: Impact of RemovingClusters
Field: Issues FoundThe
Clusters
field is still actively used across various parts of the codebase, including:
- Use case interactor logic (
server/internal/usecase/interactor/scene.go
)- MongoDB document handling (
server/internal/infrastructure/mongo/mongodoc/scene.go
)- Scene building and testing (
server/pkg/scene/builder.go
,server/pkg/scene/scene_test.go
)Removing this field will likely cause functionality issues. The
RootLayerID
field, however, appears to be safely removable as it is not found in the codebase. Please review the usage ofClusters
to ensure that any removal or refactoring does not disrupt existing functionality.Analysis chain
Verify the impact of removed fields in
ToScene
.The removal of
RootLayerID
andClusters
fields from theScene
struct could impact any functionality that relies on these fields. Ensure that these fields are no longer required or have been replaced elsewhere.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for references to the removed fields to ensure they are not used elsewhere. # Test: Search for references to `RootLayerID` and `Clusters`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go 'RootLayerID|Clusters'Length of output: 1844
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify if `RootLayerID` is used anywhere in the codebase. rg --type go 'RootLayerID' # Analyze the context of `Clusters` references to understand their impact. rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'Clusters'Length of output: 15006
server/internal/usecase/repo/container.go (1)
Removed fields are still in use elsewhere in the codebase.
The fields
DatasetSchema
,Dataset
,Layer
, andTag
, which were removed from theContainer
struct, are still referenced in various parts of the codebase. This may lead to errors if not addressed. Please review and update these references to ensure consistency and prevent potential issues.
- References to
DatasetSchema
,Dataset
,Layer
, andTag
found in:
server/internal/app/private.go
server/pkg/scene/lock_test.go
server/pkg/property/schema_field_ui.go
server/pkg/property/field.go
server/internal/infrastructure/mongo/property.go
- ...and other locations as indicated in the search results.
Analysis chain
Line range hint
19-40
: Simplification ofContainer
struct.The removal of fields
DatasetSchema
,Dataset
,Layer
, andTag
simplifies theContainer
struct, potentially improving maintainability. Ensure these fields are not used elsewhere in the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that removed fields are not used elsewhere. # Test: Search for the removed fields. Expect: No occurrences in the codebase. rg --type go 'DatasetSchema|Dataset|Layer|Tag'Length of output: 213504
server/internal/infrastructure/mongo/mongodoc/scene.go (1)
RootLayer
Still Present in CodeThe
RootLayer
field is still part of theSceneDocument
struct inscene.go
, indicating it has not been removed as suggested. This could lead to inconsistencies if the system expects it to be absent. Please review the changes to ensure consistency with the intended removal ofRootLayer
.
server/internal/infrastructure/mongo/mongodoc/scene.go
:RootLayer
is still part of theSceneDocument
struct.Analysis chain
Line range hint
90-136
:
Ensure consistency with the removal ofRootLayer
.The
Model
method has been adjusted to remove references toRootLayer
. Verify that this change aligns with the intended simplification and does not affect other parts of the system relying onRootLayer
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing `RootLayer` on the system. # Test: Search for any remaining references to `RootLayer`. Expect: No references found. rg --type go $'RootLayer'Length of output: 1287
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the references to `RootLayer` in `scene.go` are part of active code or commented out. rg --type go --context 5 'RootLayer' server/internal/infrastructure/mongo/mongodoc/scene.goLength of output: 375
server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_mutation_storytelling.go (1)
Update Test Case to Reflect Function Signature Change
The test case in
server/e2e/gql_storytelling_test.go
still referenceslayerId
, which is inconsistent with the updatedRemovePageLayer
function signature. Please update the test to remove thelayerId
parameter and ensure it aligns with the current implementation.
- File:
server/e2e/gql_storytelling_test.go
- Lines: The mutation query still includes
layerId
.Analysis chain
Line range hint
294-308
: LGTM! Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.The change from
ToID4
toToID3
simplifies the layer removal process. Verify that the function's usage aligns with this change throughout the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `RemovePageLayer` and ensure they align with the updated signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: No references to the removed `LayerID` parameter. rg --type go -A 5 $'RemovePageLayer'Length of output: 6195
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
server/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
server/pkg/layer/decoding/shapetest/shapes.zip
is excluded by!**/*.zip
Files selected for processing (50)
- .github/workflows/ci_server.yml (1 hunks)
- server/e2e/gql_nlslayer_test.go (1 hunks)
- server/e2e/gql_scene_test.go (1 hunks)
- server/e2e/gql_storytelling_test.go (4 hunks)
- server/e2e/seeder.go (3 hunks)
- server/go.mod (2 hunks)
- server/gql/property.graphql (7 hunks)
- server/gql/scene.graphql (1 hunks)
- server/gql/storytelling.graphql (4 hunks)
- server/gqlgen.yml (9 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/context.go (2 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/gqlmodel/convert_property.go (3 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/gqlmodel/convert_scene.go (1 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/gqlmodel/convert_storytelling.go (1 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/gqlmodel/models.go (3 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/gqlmodel/models_gen.go (30 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/loader.go (4 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/loader_property.go (2 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_Storytelling.go (2 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_mutation_property.go (2 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_mutation_storytelling.go (8 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_property.go (8 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_property_test.go (3 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_query.go (5 hunks)
- server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_scene.go (5 hunks)
- server/internal/app/app.go (2 hunks)
- server/internal/app/private.go (1 hunks)
- server/internal/infrastructure/memory/container.go (1 hunks)
- server/internal/infrastructure/memory/property.go (2 hunks)
- server/internal/infrastructure/mongo/container.go (2 hunks)
- server/internal/infrastructure/mongo/mongodoc/property.go (2 hunks)
- server/internal/infrastructure/mongo/mongodoc/scene.go (3 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/gateway/datasouce.go (1 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/common.go (4 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/nlslayer.go (2 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/nlslayer_test.go (4 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/plugin.go (2 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/plugin_upload.go (2 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/plugin_upload_test.go (5 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/project.go (4 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/property.go (5 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/property_test.go (3 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/scene.go (5 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/scene_plugin.go (4 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/scene_plugin_test.go (10 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interactor/storytelling.go (4 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interfaces/common.go (1 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/interfaces/property.go (2 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/repo/container.go (4 hunks)
- server/internal/usecase/repo/property.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- .github/workflows/ci_server.yml
- server/go.mod
- server/internal/adapter/gql/context.go
Additional context used
GitHub Check: ci-server / ci-server-lint
server/e2e/gql_storytelling_test.go
[failure] 910-910:
SA4006: this value ofres
is never used (staticcheck)
Additional comments not posted (86)
server/internal/usecase/gateway/datasouce.go (1)
9-11
: Verify the impact of removingFetch
fromDataSource
.The
Fetch
method has been removed from theDataSource
interface. Ensure that all implementations and dependencies that relied on this method have been updated accordingly.Verification successful
No issues found with the removal of
Fetch
fromDataSource
. The search did not reveal any dependencies on theFetch
method within the context of theDataSource
interface. Therefore, it appears that the removal does not affect other parts of the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all implementations and usages of the `DataSource` interface to ensure they don't rely on the removed `Fetch` method. # Test: Search for implementations of `DataSource`. Expect: No references to the `Fetch` method. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'type $_ struct { $$$ }' | rg 'DataSource'Length of output: 145
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any references to the `Fetch` method in the codebase to ensure it is not used anywhere. rg 'Fetch' -A 5 -B 5 --glob '*.go'Length of output: 84760
server/internal/app/private.go (1)
20-20
: Verify the purpose of theExportLayer
change.The
ExportLayer
function has been altered to return a204 No Content
status, effectively removing its previous functionality. Ensure this change aligns with the intended design and doesn't disrupt any dependent functionality.Verification successful
No dependencies found for
ExportLayer
function.The
ExportLayer
function is not called elsewhere in the codebase, indicating that changing its return value to204 No Content
does not disrupt any internal functionality. Ensure that there are no external dependencies relying on its previous behavior.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `ExportLayer` to ensure that the change to return `204 No Content` aligns with the intended design. # Test: Search for usages of `ExportLayer`. Expect: No critical dependencies on the previous functionality. rg --type go -A 5 'ExportLayer'Length of output: 383
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for calls to the `ExportLayer` function to identify any dependencies or usages in the codebase. rg --type go 'ExportLayer('Length of output: 104
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected search for calls to the `ExportLayer` function to identify any dependencies or usages in the codebase. rg --type go '\bExportLayer\b'Length of output: 101
server/gql/scene.graphql (1)
Line range hint
1-1
:
Verify the impact of field removal on client queries.The removal of fields like
rootLayerId
,widgetAlignSystem
,rootLayer
,datasetSchemas
,tagIds
,tags
, andclusters
may affect how clients interact with theScene
type. Ensure that all client queries are updated to reflect these changes.server/internal/infrastructure/memory/container.go (1)
Line range hint
7-21
:
Verify the handling of removed fields in theContainer
structure.The removal of fields such as
DatasetSchema
,Dataset
,Layer
, andTag
suggests a refactor. Ensure that these entities are handled appropriately elsewhere in the codebase.server/e2e/gql_scene_test.go (1)
11-49
: Test structure looks good.The
TestCreateScene
function is well-structured and uses theassert
library effectively to verify the response. Ensure that thebaseSeeder
and other dependencies are correctly set up for the test environment.server/internal/usecase/interactor/plugin.go (1)
Line range hint
1-49
: Simplification ofPlugin
struct is approved.The removal of
layerRepo
from thePlugin
struct reduces complexity and potentially shifts responsibilities. Ensure that this change does not impact other parts of the codebase that might depend onlayerRepo
.Verification successful
Simplification of
Plugin
struct confirmed.The removal of
layerRepo
from thePlugin
struct does not impact other parts of the codebase, as there are no occurrences oflayerRepo
found. The change is safe and aligns with the intended simplification.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing `layerRepo` from `Plugin`. # Test: Search for any usage of `layerRepo` in the codebase. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go 'layerRepo'Length of output: 3199
server/e2e/seeder.go (1)
Line range hint
1-68
: Simplification ofbaseSeeder
is approved.The removal of dataset-related logic simplifies the
baseSeeder
function. Verify that dataset management is handled appropriately elsewhere if needed.server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_Storytelling.go (1)
Line range hint
1-1
:
Verify the impact of removed methods.The removal of
Layers
andSwipeableLayers
methods fromstoryPageResolver
suggests a significant change in functionality. Ensure that any functionality relying on these methods has been updated accordingly.server/internal/usecase/interfaces/common.go (1)
24-40
: Ensure integration of new error variables.The addition of new error variables enhances error handling. Verify that these errors are integrated into the codebase where relevant operations are performed.
server/internal/adapter/gql/loader_property.go (3)
Line range hint
15-33
: Fetch function is correctly implemented.The
Fetch
function handles ID conversion and property fetching with appropriate error handling.
Line range hint
11-13
: PropertyLoader struct is correctly defined.The
PropertyLoader
struct encapsulates the property use case effectively.
Line range hint
48-63
: ordinaryPropertyLoader struct and methods are correctly implemented.The struct and its methods facilitate property loading effectively.
server/internal/adapter/gql/loader.go (5)
Line range hint
12-23
: Loaders struct changes align with simplification goals.The removal of certain loaders helps streamline the loader responsibilities.
Line range hint
25-35
: DataLoaders struct changes align with simplification goals.The removal of certain data loaders helps streamline the data loading responsibilities.
Line range hint
37-50
: NewLoaders function changes align with simplification goals.The removal of certain loader instantiations helps streamline the loader initialization.
64-71
: DataLoaders function changes align with simplification goals.The removal of certain data loader references helps streamline the data loading process.
76-83
: OrdinaryDataLoaders function changes align with simplification goals.The removal of certain ordinary data loader references helps streamline the ordinary data loading process.
server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_scene.go (3)
Line range hint
9-11
: Scene function is correctly implemented.The
Scene
function returns a newsceneResolver
as expected.
Line range hint
17-19
: Project function in sceneResolver is correctly implemented.The function loads a project using data loaders effectively.
21-23
: Team function in sceneResolver is correctly implemented.The function loads a team using data loaders effectively.
server/internal/usecase/interfaces/property.go (2)
Line range hint
60-71
: Verify the impact of removingFetchSchema
andFetchMerged
methods.The
FetchSchema
andFetchMerged
methods have been removed from theProperty
interface. Ensure that this does not break existing functionality that relied on these methods.Verification successful
Removal of
FetchSchema
andFetchMerged
Methods from Interface Verified
- The
FetchSchema
method is now implemented in a concrete class, indicating a design change to localize its functionality.- The
FetchMerged
method is not found in the codebase, suggesting it has been deprecated or replaced.These changes appear intentional and align with a potential redesign of the codebase. Ensure that any dependent functionality is updated accordingly.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing `FetchSchema` and `FetchMerged` methods from the `Property` interface. # Test: Search for usages of `FetchSchema` and `FetchMerged` to ensure no functionality is broken. rg --type go 'FetchSchema|FetchMerged'Length of output: 224
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for the implementation of `FetchSchema` and `FetchMerged` in the codebase to understand their current usage. # Find all implementations of `FetchSchema`. rg --type go 'func.*FetchSchema' # Find all implementations of `FetchMerged`. rg --type go 'func.*FetchMerged'Length of output: 253
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any references to `FetchMerged` in the codebase to verify if it has been removed or replaced. # Search for references to `FetchMerged`. rg --type go 'FetchMerged'Length of output: 26
30-31
: Verify the impact of removing theLinks
field.The
Links
field has been removed fromLinkPropertyValueParam
. Ensure that this removal does not break existing functionality that relied on this field.server/internal/adapter/gql/gqlmodel/convert_storytelling.go (1)
Line range hint
26-37
: Verify the impact of removingLayersIds
andSwipeableLayers
.The
LayersIds
andSwipeableLayers
fields have been removed from theStoryPage
construction. Ensure that this does not break existing functionality that relied on these fields.server/internal/infrastructure/memory/property.go (3)
Line range hint
1-10
: Verify the impact of removing theFiltered
method.The
Filtered
method has been removed from theProperty
struct. Ensure that this does not break existing functionality that relied on this method.Verification successful
No impact found from removing the
Filtered
method inProperty
. The search did not reveal any usages of theFiltered
method from theProperty
struct in thememory
package, indicating that its removal does not affect other parts of the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing the `Filtered` method from the `Property` struct. # Test: Search for usages of `Filtered` to ensure no functionality is broken. rg --type go 'Filtered'Length of output: 5444
Line range hint
1-10
: Verify the impact of removing theFindByDataset
method.The
FindByDataset
method has been removed from theProperty
struct. Ensure that this does not break existing functionality that relied on this method.Verification successful
Removal of
FindByDataset
frommemory
package does not impact functionality.The
FindByDataset
method was removed from thememory
package, and there are no references to it in the codebase, indicating that its removal does not affect existing functionality.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing the `FindByDataset` method from the `Property` struct. # Test: Search for usages of `FindByDataset` to ensure no functionality is broken. rg --type go 'FindByDataset'Length of output: 198
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for references to the `FindByDataset` method in the `memory` package to ensure its removal does not impact the codebase. # Test: Search for any references to `FindByDataset` in the `memory` package. rg --type go 'memory.*FindByDataset'Length of output: 38
Line range hint
1-10
: Verify the impact of removing theFindLinkedAll
method.The
FindLinkedAll
method has been removed from theProperty
struct. Ensure that this does not break existing functionality that relied on this method.Verification successful
No Impact from Removing
FindLinkedAll
Method in Memory PackageThe
FindLinkedAll
method was removed from thememory
package and no references to this method were found in the codebase. The method still exists in themongo
package, suggesting that the functionality is managed there. This removal does not break any existing functionality.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing the `FindLinkedAll` method from the `Property` struct. # Test: Search for usages of `FindLinkedAll` to ensure no functionality is broken. rg --type go 'FindLinkedAll'Length of output: 171
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for references to the `FindLinkedAll` method in the memory package to ensure its removal does not break anything. # Test: Search for references to `FindLinkedAll` within the memory package. rg --type go 'memory.*FindLinkedAll'Length of output: 38
server/internal/usecase/repo/container.go (1)
Line range hint
48-65
: Update toFiltered
method.The method has been updated to align with the structural changes, removing unnecessary filtering. Ensure the updated method behavior aligns with the intended functionality.
server/gql/storytelling.graphql (4)
Line range hint
92-100
: Update toCreateStoryPageInput
.The removal of the
layers
field aligns with the data model simplification. Ensure the input type is used correctly in mutations.Verification successful
Verification Successful:
CreateStoryPageInput
UsageThe
CreateStoryPageInput
is correctly used in thecreateStoryPage
mutation without thelayers
field, aligning with the data model simplification.
server/gql/storytelling.graphql
: Verified usage increateStoryPage
mutation.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `CreateStoryPageInput` in mutations. # Test: Search for `CreateStoryPageInput` usage in GraphQL files. Expect: Correct usage without the `layers` field. rg --type graphql 'CreateStoryPageInput'Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `CreateStoryPageInput` in GraphQL files. # Test: Search for `CreateStoryPageInput` usage in all files, focusing on GraphQL patterns. rg 'CreateStoryPageInput' --glob '*.{graphql,graphqls,gql}' -A 5Length of output: 920
Line range hint
112-120
: Update toPageLayerInput
.The removal of the
layerId
field further simplifies the data model. Ensure the input type is used correctly in mutations.
Line range hint
102-110
: Update toUpdateStoryPageInput
.The removal of the
layers
field is consistent with the data model simplification. Ensure the input type is used correctly in mutations.Verification successful
Update to
UpdateStoryPageInput
confirmed.The removal of the
layers
field fromUpdateStoryPageInput
is correctly reflected in theupdateStoryPage
mutation. The input type is used consistently with the updated fields.
server/gql/storytelling.graphql
:UpdateStoryPageInput
is used in theupdateStoryPage
mutation without thelayers
field.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `UpdateStoryPageInput` in mutations. # Test: Search for `UpdateStoryPageInput` usage in GraphQL files. Expect: Correct usage without the `layers` field. rg --type graphql 'UpdateStoryPageInput'Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `UpdateStoryPageInput` in mutations. # Test: Search for `UpdateStoryPageInput` usage in GraphQL files by looking for the term in `.graphql` files. rg 'UpdateStoryPageInput' --glob '*.graphql' -A 5Length of output: 885
Line range hint
30-40
: Simplification ofStoryPage
type.The removal of
layersIds
andlayers
fields simplifies theStoryPage
type. Ensure these fields are not used in GraphQL operations elsewhere.Verification successful
Verification Complete: Safe Removal of Fields from
StoryPage
TypeThe
layersIds
andlayers
fields removed from theStoryPage
type are not used elsewhere in the GraphQL operations, as the occurrences found are unrelated to this type. The simplification of theStoryPage
type is confirmed to be safe.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that removed fields are not used in GraphQL operations. # Test: Search for the removed fields in GraphQL files. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type graphql 'layersIds|layers'Length of output: 70
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find .graphql files and search for the removed fields in them. # Find all .graphql files and search for 'layersIds' or 'layers'. fd --extension graphql --exec rg 'layersIds|layers' {}Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find the context of 'layers' in .graphql files to verify its relevance. # Search for 'layers' in .graphql files with context lines to understand its usage. fd --extension graphql --exec rg 'layers' -A 3 -B 3 {}Length of output: 157
server/internal/infrastructure/mongo/container.go (2)
Line range hint
26-58
: Simplification ofNew
function.The removal of
DatasetSchema
,Dataset
,Layer
, andTag
initialization simplifies the container setup. Ensure these components are not required elsewhere in the initialization process.
Line range hint
82-108
: Update toInit
function.The function has been updated to reflect the structural changes, removing unnecessary initializations. Ensure the updated function behavior aligns with the intended functionality.
server/internal/usecase/interactor/scene_plugin.go (2)
Line range hint
51-97
:
Simplification ofUninstallPlugin
logic.The removal of layer and block handling in
UninstallPlugin
simplifies the method, focusing on property removal and plugin uninstallation. Ensure that the removed functionality is no longer required or is handled elsewhere.
Line range hint
99-141
:
StreamliningUpgradePlugin
with PluginMigrator.The
UpgradePlugin
method now relies onPluginMigrator
without direct layer or dataset interaction. This approach is cleaner but verify that the migration logic is comprehensive and covers all necessary aspects.Verification successful
Comprehensive Migration Logic in
PluginMigrator
VerifiedThe
PluginMigrator
struct includes methods such asMigratePlugins
andloadSchemas
, which collectively handle plugin migration and schema management. This setup confirms that the migration logic is comprehensive and aligns with the streamlined approach described in the review comment.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the coverage of migration logic in `PluginMigrator`. # Test: Search for the definition and usage of `PluginMigrator` to ensure it handles all necessary migration logic. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'type PluginMigrator struct { $$$ }'Length of output: 438
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for methods defined within the `PluginMigrator` struct. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (pm *PluginMigrator) $_($$$) $_ { $$$ }' # Search for usages of `PluginMigrator` methods to understand how they are invoked. rg 'PluginMigrator' -A 5Length of output: 3252
server/internal/usecase/interactor/common.go (2)
Line range hint
37-53
:
RefactoringNewContainer
to focus on core components.The removal of
Dataset
,Layer
, andTag
components fromNewContainer
indicates a streamlined approach. Confirm that these components are either deprecated or managed differently.
144-146
: Specialization ofSceneDeleter
.The
SceneDeleter
now focuses solely on scene-related deletions. Ensure that the deletion of layers, datasets, and schemas is no longer required or is handled elsewhere.Verification successful
SceneDeleter specialization verified.
The
SceneDeleter
class is now correctly focused on scene-related deletions, without handling layers, datasets, or schemas. These are managed elsewhere in the codebase. The refactor aligns with the intended specialization.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the handling of layer, dataset, and schema deletions post-refactor. # Test: Search for any references to layer, dataset, and schema deletions in the codebase. rg --type go 'RemoveByScene' -A 5Length of output: 5725
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the SceneDeleter class or function to verify its current responsibilities. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'type SceneDeleter struct { $$$ }'Length of output: 412
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for functions or methods within SceneDeleter to check for any deletion logic related to layers, datasets, or schemas. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func ($_ SceneDeleter) $_($$$) error { $$$ }'Length of output: 2304
server/gqlgen.yml (1)
Line range hint
19-19
:
Simplification of GraphQL schema.The removal of multiple entities and fields indicates a significant refactor. Ensure that the removed entities are no longer required or are replaced by other mechanisms in the GraphQL API.
server/internal/infrastructure/mongo/mongodoc/scene.go (1)
Line range hint
65-88
:
Update the function signature and return type.The
NewScene
function no longer returns a string, reflecting the removal of theRootLayer
. Ensure that all calls to this function in the codebase are updated to handle the new return type.server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_property.go (1)
94-94
: Verify the impact of removed resolver functions.The
Groups
method inmergedPropertyResolver
now returnsnil
directly. Ensure that this change does not negatively impact the functionality or expected behavior of the GraphQL API.server/internal/usecase/interactor/property_test.go (3)
120-120
: LGTM! Verify test behavior.The removal of
RootLayer
appears to be fine for this test. However, verify that the test behavior remains consistent without it.Verification successful
Removal of
RootLayer
is Safe for TestThe
RootLayer
is not referenced inproperty_test.go
, indicating it does not impact the test logic. Its removal should not affect the test behavior.
- No references to
RootLayer
inproperty_test.go
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the test behavior remains consistent without `RootLayer`. # Run the specific test to ensure it passes as expected. go test -v -run TestProperty_UpdateValue_FieldOfGroupInList ./server/internal/usecase/interactor/Length of output: 169
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any references to `RootLayer` in the test file and related files. rg 'RootLayer' -A 5 server/internal/usecase/interactor/property_test.goLength of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any references to `RootLayer` in the entire codebase to understand its role. rg 'RootLayer' -A 5Length of output: 5894
75-75
: LGTM! Verify test behavior.The removal of
RootLayer
appears to be fine for this test. However, verify that the test behavior remains consistent without it.Verification successful
No impact from
RootLayer
removal on test behavior.The
RootLayer
is not referenced in theproperty_test.go
file or the broaderinteractor
directory. This confirms that its removal does not impact the test logic or behavior. You can proceed with confidence that the test remains consistent.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the test behavior remains consistent without `RootLayer`. # Run the specific test to ensure it passes as expected. go test -v -run TestProperty_RemoveItem ./server/internal/usecase/interactor/Length of output: 149
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any references to `RootLayer` in the test file and related files. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'RootLayer' server/internal/usecase/interactor/property_test.goLength of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any references to `RootLayer` in the entire interactor directory to check for indirect dependencies. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'RootLayer' server/internal/usecase/interactor/Length of output: 76
23-23
: LGTM! Verify test behavior.The removal of
RootLayer
appears to be fine for this test. However, verify that the test behavior remains consistent without it.Verification successful
Removal of
RootLayer
is Safe for TestProperty_AddItemThe
TestProperty_AddItem
function does not rely onRootLayer
for its logic or assertions. Thescene
object is used for ID and workspace association, which are unrelated toRootLayer
. Therefore, the removal ofRootLayer
does not impact the test.
- The
scene
object is used to create aProperty
and is associated with theOperator
.- The test focuses on adding items to a property, with no direct dependency on
RootLayer
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the test behavior remains consistent without `RootLayer`. # Run the specific test to ensure it passes as expected. go test -v -run TestProperty_AddItem ./server/internal/usecase/interactor/Length of output: 146
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition and usage of the `TestProperty_AddItem` function to understand its reliance on `scene`. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func TestProperty_AddItem($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 8104
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the usage of `scene` within the `TestProperty_AddItem` function to see if `RootLayer` is essential. rg 'scene' -A 5 -B 5 --context-separator='---' --within-file --no-heading --line-number --color=neverLength of output: 546
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Correct the previous rg command and search for the usage of `scene` within the `TestProperty_AddItem` function. rg 'scene' -A 5 -B 5 --context-separator='---' --no-heading --line-number --color=never ./server/internal/usecase/interactor/property_test.goLength of output: 5026
server/internal/infrastructure/mongo/mongodoc/property.go (2)
Line range hint
74-82
:
SimplifiednewPropertyField
by removingLinks
. Verify impact.The removal of
Links
handling simplifies the function. Ensure that any dependent code is updated to reflect this change.Verification successful
Limited Impact of
Links
Removal innewPropertyField
The
newPropertyField
function is only used within the same file, indicating that the removal ofLinks
handling does not impact other parts of the codebase. Ensure that any logic relying onLinks
within this file is updated accordingly.
server/internal/infrastructure/mongo/mongodoc/property.go
: FunctionnewPropertyField
usage is localized.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing `Links` handling on dependent code. # Search for usages of `newPropertyField` to identify potentially affected code. rg --type go 'newPropertyField'Length of output: 261
Line range hint
150-159
:
SimplifiedtoModelPropertyField
by removingflinks
. Verify impact.The removal of
flinks
handling simplifies the function. Ensure that any dependent code is updated to reflect this change.server/internal/usecase/interactor/nlslayer_test.go (4)
130-130
: LGTM! Verify test behavior.The removal of
RootLayer
appears to be fine for this test. However, verify that the test behavior remains consistent without it.
208-208
: LGTM! Verify test behavior.The removal of
RootLayer
appears to be fine for this test. However, verify that the test behavior remains consistent without it.Verification successful
Removal of
RootLayer
does not affect the test logic.The
RootLayer
was previously part of the scene setup but is now commented out, and there are no other references to it in the test file. This indicates that its removal does not impact the test logic for deleting a GeoJSON feature.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the test behavior remains consistent without `RootLayer`. # Run the specific test to ensure it passes as expected. go test -v -run TestDeleteGeoJSONFeature ./server/internal/usecase/interactor/Length of output: 150
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for references to `RootLayer` in the test file and related files to verify its impact on test logic. rg 'RootLayer' -A 5 ./server/internal/usecase/interactor/nlslayer_test.goLength of output: 1234
24-24
: LGTM! Verify test behavior.The removal of
RootLayer
appears to be fine for this test. However, verify that the test behavior remains consistent without it.
74-74
: LGTM! Verify test behavior.The removal of
RootLayer
appears to be fine for this test. However, verify that the test behavior remains consistent without it.server/internal/usecase/interactor/plugin_upload.go (1)
Line range hint
129-177
: Verify handling of orphaned resources inmigrateScenePlugin
.The removal of operations related to the deletion of layers, blocks, and widgets associated with deleted extensions could lead to orphaned resources. Ensure that these resources are managed elsewhere, or confirm that their persistence is intentional.
server/internal/usecase/interactor/plugin_upload_test.go (1)
97-97
: Ensure comprehensive test coverage for plugin uploads.The removal of
TestPlugin_Upload_SameVersion
may impact test coverage. Ensure that the remaining tests adequately cover scenarios for uploading plugins with the same version.server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_mutation_property.go (1)
Line range hint
107-121
: Verify the impact of removing thelinks
variable inLinkDatasetToPropertyValue
.The removal of the
links
variable simplifies the method, but ensure that it does not affect the intended functionality of dataset linking.Verification successful
Removal of
links
variable does not impact functionality.The
links
variable removal from theLinkDatasetToPropertyValue
method appears to be a local simplification with no adverse effects on functionality. There are no dependencies or references tolinks
in this context that would suggest otherwise.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the removal of the `links` variable impacts functionality. # Test: Search for any other references to `links` in the codebase to ensure functionality is not affected. rg --type go 'links'Length of output: 2257
server/internal/usecase/interactor/property.go (5)
Line range hint
36-38
: Verify removal ofFetchMerged
method.The removal of this method indicates a change in how merged properties are handled. Confirm that its functionality is either deprecated or moved elsewhere.
Line range hint
26-34
: Verify constructor changes inNewProperty
.The constructor no longer initializes
datasetRepo
anddatasetSchemaRepo
. Ensure that this change aligns with the overall architectural refactoring and that no functionality is lost.Verification successful
Constructor changes in
NewProperty
are aligned with refactoring. The removal ofdatasetRepo
anddatasetSchemaRepo
from theNewProperty
constructor does not impact the functionality, as these fields were not used within theProperty
struct or its methods. This change is consistent with the architectural refactoring.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify constructor usage for `NewProperty`. # Test: Search for `NewProperty` invocations. Expect: No errors due to missing `datasetRepo` and `datasetSchemaRepo`. rg --type go 'NewProperty'Length of output: 13947
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for `datasetRepo` and `datasetSchemaRepo` usage within the `Property` struct or its methods. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'struct Property { $$$ datasetRepo $_ $$$ }' || true ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'struct Property { $$$ datasetSchemaRepo $_ $$$ }' || true # Search for any methods in the `Property` struct that might have used `datasetRepo` or `datasetSchemaRepo`. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func ($_ *Property) $_($$$) { $$$ }' || trueLength of output: 5168
Line range hint
14-24
: Consider the impact of removingdatasetRepo
anddatasetSchemaRepo
.The removal of these fields suggests a significant change in how datasets are handled. Ensure that any functionality relying on these fields is adequately refactored or removed elsewhere in the codebase.
Verification successful
Removal of
datasetRepo
anddatasetSchemaRepo
is safe. The fieldsdatasetRepo
anddatasetSchemaRepo
are not referenced elsewhere in the codebase, indicating that their removal does not affect other parts of the code.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of `datasetRepo` and `datasetSchemaRepo` in the codebase. # Test: Search for references to `datasetRepo` and `datasetSchemaRepo`. Expect: No references outside this file. rg --type go 'datasetRepo|datasetSchemaRepo'Length of output: 46
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any tests or indirect references related to `datasetRepo` and `datasetSchemaRepo`. # Test: Search for any test files or methods that might reference dataset functionality. rg --type go 'dataset|schema' --glob '*_test.go' -A 5 # Test: Search for any indirect usage or comments that might reference dataset handling. rg --type go 'dataset|schema' -A 5Length of output: 296135
Line range hint
40-61
: Review changes inLinkValue
method.The removal of dataset linking validation suggests a shift in how links are managed. Ensure that any necessary validation is handled elsewhere to maintain data integrity.
Line range hint
63-84
: Review changes inUnlinkValue
method.The removal of
field.Unlink()
indicates a change in the unlinking process. Verify that this change does not introduce any issues in the unlinking logic.server/internal/adapter/gql/gqlmodel/convert_property.go (2)
Line range hint
14-16
: Verify removal of property link functions.The removal of functions such as
ToPropertyFieldLinks
,FromPropertyFieldLink
, andToPropertyFieldLink
indicates a change in link handling. Ensure that any necessary functionality is covered elsewhere.Verification successful
The removed functions
ToPropertyFieldLinks
,FromPropertyFieldLink
, andToPropertyFieldLink
are not referenced elsewhere in the codebase, suggesting their removal does not directly impact other parts of the system. Ensure that their functionality is either obsolete or covered by alternative implementations. If necessary, verify manually.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of removed property link functions. # Test: Search for references to removed functions. Expect: No references outside this file. rg --type go 'ToPropertyFieldLinks|FromPropertyFieldLink|ToPropertyFieldLink'Length of output: 79
Line range hint
18-20
: Verify removal of merged property functions.The removal of functions like
ToMergedPropertyFromMetadata
,ToMergedProperty
,ToMergedPropertyGroup
, andToMergedPropertyField
suggests a change in how merged properties are handled. Confirm that these changes align with the new architecture.Verification successful
Removal of Merged Property Functions Verified and Aligned with New Architecture
The functions
ToMergedPropertyFromMetadata
,ToMergedProperty
,ToMergedPropertyGroup
, andToMergedPropertyField
have been removed and replaced with new implementations and structures such asToPropertyField
,ToPropertyGroup
, andToPropertyGroupList
. These changes indicate a shift in how merged properties are handled, aligning with a new architectural approach. The new code provides similar functionality in a potentially more modular or efficient manner.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of removed merged property functions. # Test: Search for references to removed functions. Expect: No references outside this file. rg --type go 'ToMergedPropertyFromMetadata|ToMergedProperty|ToMergedPropertyGroup|ToMergedPropertyField'Length of output: 106
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for new functions or changes related to handling merged properties. # Test: Search for new functions that might handle merged properties. rg --type go 'MergedProperty|MergedProperties|PropertyGroup|PropertyField' -A 5 # Test: Search for any new struct or interface definitions related to merged properties. rg --type go 'type MergedProperty|type MergedProperties|type PropertyGroup|type PropertyField' -A 5Length of output: 265501
server/internal/usecase/interactor/scene_plugin_test.go (3)
207-207
: Verify removal of test cases inTestScene_UninstallPlugin
.The removal of test cases for uninstalling plugins indicates a shift in testing strategy. Confirm that the remaining tests cover the necessary scenarios.
Verification successful
Test Coverage for
TestScene_UninstallPlugin
Appears SufficientThe
TestScene_UninstallPlugin
function still contains multiple test cases, covering scenarios such as plugins not being installed, not found, and operation denial. This indicates that the test coverage remains adequate despite any potential removals.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for `TestScene_UninstallPlugin`. # Test: Check for removed test cases and ensure adequate coverage remains. rg --type go 'TestScene_UninstallPlugin'Length of output: 143
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the content of the `TestScene_UninstallPlugin` function to analyze its test cases. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func TestScene_UninstallPlugin($_) { $$$ }' -A 20Length of output: 12183
94-94
: Verify removal of test cases inTestScene_InstallPlugin
.The removal of specific test cases suggests a change in focus. Ensure that the remaining tests adequately cover the plugin installation scenarios.
Verification successful
Test coverage for
TestScene_InstallPlugin
is adequate.The function
TestScene_InstallPlugin
includes comprehensive test cases covering various scenarios, ensuring robust test coverage for plugin installation. No further action is needed regarding the removal of test cases.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for `TestScene_InstallPlugin`. # Test: Check for removed test cases and ensure adequate coverage remains. rg --type go 'TestScene_InstallPlugin'Length of output: 139
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the contents of the `TestScene_InstallPlugin` function to review its current test coverage. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func TestScene_InstallPlugin(t *testing.T) { $$$ }'Length of output: 9796
337-337
: Verify removal of test cases inTestScene_UpgradePlugin
.The removal of test cases for upgrading plugins suggests a change in focus. Ensure that the remaining tests adequately cover the upgrade scenarios.
Verification successful
Test cases for
TestScene_UpgradePlugin
are still present and adequate.The
TestScene_UpgradePlugin
function includes multiple scenarios, such as "not installed", "diff names", and "operation denied", which cover different aspects of plugin upgrades. There is no evidence of significant test case removal. The function appears to adequately test the upgrade scenarios.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for `TestScene_UpgradePlugin`. # Test: Check for removed test cases and ensure adequate coverage remains. rg --type go 'TestScene_UpgradePlugin'Length of output: 139
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the contents of the `TestScene_UpgradePlugin` function to verify test coverage. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func TestScene_UpgradePlugin($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 9906
server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_mutation_storytelling.go (3)
Line range hint
66-80
: LGTM! Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.The removal of the
Layers
parameter from the return structure simplifies the function. Verify that the function's usage aligns with this change throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Consistent Usage of
CreateStoryPage
Across CodebaseThe removal of the
Layers
parameter from theCreateStoryPage
function is consistent across the codebase. The test case ingql_storytelling_test.go
confirms that the function is used correctly without theLayers
parameter. Generated code ingenerated.go
aligns with the updated schema. No issues found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `CreateStoryPage` and ensure they align with the updated return structure. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: No references to the removed `Layers` parameter. rg --type go -A 5 $'CreateStoryPage'Length of output: 8446
Line range hint
82-96
: LGTM! Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.The removal of the
Layers
parameter from the return structure simplifies the function. Verify that the function's usage aligns with this change throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Consistent Usage of
UpdateStoryPage
VerifiedThe
UpdateStoryPage
function's usage across the codebase aligns with the updated return structure, confirming the removal of theLayers
parameter. No references to the removed parameter were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `UpdateStoryPage` and ensure they align with the updated return structure. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: No references to the removed `Layers` parameter. rg --type go -A 5 $'UpdateStoryPage'Length of output: 8478
Line range hint
270-284
: LGTM! Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.The change from
ToID4
toToID3
simplifies the layer addition process. Verify that the function's usage aligns with this change throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Ensure Consistency in Test Code
The change from
ToID4
toToID3
is consistent across the codebase. However, there are commented-out references toLayerID
ingql_storytelling_test.go
that should be updated or removed to avoid confusion.
- File:
server/e2e/gql_storytelling_test.go
- Lines: References to
LayerID
in commented-out code.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `AddPageLayer` and ensure they align with the updated signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: No references to the removed `LayerID` parameter. rg --type go -A 5 $'AddPageLayer'Length of output: 6244
server/internal/usecase/interactor/project.go (4)
26-36
: LGTM! Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.The removal of repository fields simplifies the
Project
struct. Verify that the struct's usage aligns with this change throughout the codebase.Verification successful
No references to removed fields found.
The removed fields
layerRepo
,datasetRepo
,datasetSchemaRepo
, andtagRepo
from theProject
struct are not referenced elsewhere in the codebase, confirming the changes are safe.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `Project` struct and ensure they align with the updated fields. # Test: Search for the struct usage. Expect: No references to the removed repository fields. rg --type go -A 5 $'type Project struct'Length of output: 2492
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for references to the removed fields to ensure they are not used elsewhere in the codebase. # Search for references to the removed fields. rg 'layerRepo' rg 'datasetRepo' rg 'datasetSchemaRepo' rg 'tagRepo'Length of output: 3242
Line range hint
264-306
: LGTM! Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.The
Publish
method has been refactored to remove unnecessary repository references, simplifying data management. Verify that the method's usage aligns with this change throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Ensure Consistent Usage of the
Publish
Method Across the CodebaseThe refactored
Publish
method inproject.go
has been verified for consistent usage throughout the codebase. The changes align with the updated data management approach, and no references to removed repository fields were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `Publish` method and ensure they align with the updated data management approach. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: No references to the removed repository fields. rg --type go -A 5 $'Publish'Length of output: 121459
452-454
: LGTM! Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.The
Delete
method has been refactored to remove unnecessary repository references, simplifying data management. Verify that the method's usage aligns with this change throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Refactoring of the
Delete
Method is Consistent Across the CodebaseThe
Delete
method has been refactored to remove unnecessary repository references, and its usage aligns with the updated data management approach throughout the codebase. No direct references to the removed repository fields were found in the method's usage.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `Delete` method and ensure they align with the updated data management approach. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: No references to the removed repository fields. rg --type go -A 5 $'Delete'Length of output: 116949
41-52
: LGTM! Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.The
NewProject
function has been updated to match the simplifiedProject
struct. Verify that the function's usage aligns with this change throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Verification Complete: Consistent Usage of
NewProject
The
NewProject
function is used consistently with the updated struct definition in the codebase. The instances inserver/internal/usecase/interactor/common.go
andserver/internal/adapter/gql/loader.go
align with the intended changes. No issues found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `NewProject` function and ensure they align with the updated struct definition. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: No references to the removed repository fields. rg --type go -A 5 $'NewProject'Length of output: 15538
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Inspect the usage of NewProject in server/internal/usecase/interactor/common.go rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 $'NewProject(r, g)' server/internal/usecase/interactor/common.go # Inspect the usage of NewProject in server/internal/adapter/gql/loader.go rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 $'NewProjectLoader(usecases.Project)' server/internal/adapter/gql/loader.goLength of output: 188
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Broadly search for any occurrence of NewProject in server/internal/usecase/interactor/common.go rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'NewProject' server/internal/usecase/interactor/common.go # Broadly search for any occurrence of NewProjectLoader in server/internal/adapter/gql/loader.go rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'NewProjectLoader' server/internal/adapter/gql/loader.goLength of output: 993
server/internal/usecase/interactor/scene.go (3)
Line range hint
26-40
: LGTM! Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.The removal of
layerRepo
anddatasetRepo
fields simplifies theScene
struct. Verify that the struct's usage aligns with this change throughout the codebase.Verification successful
LGTM! The
Scene
struct's refactoring by removinglayerRepo
anddatasetRepo
fields appears consistent across the codebase. No references to these fields were found in otherScene
struct usages.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `Scene` struct and ensure they align with the updated fields. # Test: Search for the struct usage. Expect: No references to the removed repository fields. rg --type go -A 5 $'type Scene struct'Length of output: 2337
Line range hint
76-122
: LGTM! Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.The removal of
rootLayer
logic simplifies scene creation. Verify that the method's usage aligns with this change throughout the codebase.Verification successful
LGTM! Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.
The removal of
rootLayer
logic in theCreate
method ofscene.go
appears consistent, with no references to the removed logic found in the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `Create` method and ensure they align with the updated scene creation process. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: No references to the removed `rootLayer` logic. rg --type go -A 5 $'Create'Length of output: 170994
Line range hint
42-53
: LGTM! Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.The
NewScene
function has been updated to match the simplifiedScene
struct. Verify that the function's usage aligns with this change throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Usage of
NewScene
is consistent with its updated definition. TheNewScene
function is correctly utilized inserver/internal/usecase/interactor/common.go
in accordance with its updated struct definition, which excludes certain repository fields. No issues were found regarding its usage in the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `NewScene` function and ensure they align with the updated struct definition. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: No references to the removed repository fields. rg --type go -A 5 $'NewScene'Length of output: 28412
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Refine search to focus on the `NewScene` function in `server/internal/usecase/interactor/scene.go`. # Test: Search for the specific usage of `NewScene` in the interactor package. rg --type go -A 5 'NewScene(r, g)' server/internal/usecase/interactor/Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Broaden search to capture any usage of `NewScene` in the interactor package. # Test: Search for any usage of `NewScene` in the interactor package. rg --type go -A 5 'NewScene' server/internal/usecase/interactor/Length of output: 5915
server/internal/usecase/interactor/nlslayer.go (2)
277-279
: Verify the implications of creating multipleinfobox
instances.The removal of the check for an existing
infobox
might lead to multiple instances being created for the same layer. Ensure this does not compromise data integrity or violate business rules.
Line range hint
104-123
:
Verify the impact of removing the immediate error return forparentLayer
.The logic now proceeds to remove the layer from
parentLayer.Children()
and saves the updatedparentLayer
. Ensure this change does not introduce unintended side effects, particularly in scenarios where layers are expected to remain linked.server/e2e/gql_nlslayer_test.go (1)
Line range hint
212-215
:
Verify the impact of removingrootLayerId
from the GraphQL query.The removal of
rootLayerId
suggests a shift in data requirements. Ensure that this change does not affect the downstream processing of the fetched data.server/internal/usecase/interactor/storytelling.go (2)
Line range hint
167-217
:
Verify the correctness of the updatedPublish
method.The removal of repository references suggests a simplification of the publishing process. Ensure that the new logic correctly handles publishing without the removed dependencies.
Line range hint
25-35
:
Verify the impact of removing repositories fromStorytelling
.The removal of
layerRepo
,datasetRepo
, andtagRepo
suggests a refactor in data management. Ensure these changes align with the overall architecture and do not affect functionality.server/e2e/gql_storytelling_test.go (4)
1044-1044
: Update the regular expression to match the new data format.The regular expression pattern has been updated to reflect the changes in the data format. Ensure that this pattern aligns with the expected output from the GraphQL API.
491-545
: Review the commented-outaddLayerToPage
function.The
addLayerToPage
function has been commented out, which suggests that the functionality might be deprecated or replaced. Ensure that the removal of this function does not affect other parts of the codebase that rely on adding layers to pages.Verification successful
No active usage of
addLayerToPage
function found.The
addLayerToPage
function is not actively used elsewhere in the codebase, as all occurrences are commented out. Its removal should not affect other functionalities.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the `addLayerToPage` function is called elsewhere in the codebase. # Test: Search for occurrences of `addLayerToPage`. Expect: No active usage. rg --type go 'addLayerToPage'Length of output: 315
547-601
: Review the commented-outremoveLayerToPage
function.The
removeLayerToPage
function has been commented out. Verify that this change aligns with the new architecture and that no other parts of the codebase depend on this function.Verification successful
No active usage of
removeLayerToPage
function found.The
removeLayerToPage
function is not actively used elsewhere in the codebase, suggesting that commenting it out does not impact the current functionality. Ensure that this change aligns with any architectural updates or documentation.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the `removeLayerToPage` function is called elsewhere in the codebase. # Test: Search for occurrences of `removeLayerToPage`. Expect: No active usage. rg --type go 'removeLayerToPage'Length of output: 324
896-918
: Consider re-enabling or refactoring tests inTestStoryPageLayersCRUD
.Several lines related to story creation, page creation, and layer management are commented out in
TestStoryPageLayersCRUD
. Ensure that these tests are either obsolete or have been replaced by new tests to maintain test coverage.Tools
GitHub Check: ci-server / ci-server-lint
[failure] 910-910:
SA4006: this value ofres
is never used (staticcheck)server/internal/adapter/gql/gqlmodel/models_gen.go (5)
1750-1750
: Review thePropertySchemaFieldUI
enum for consistency.The
PropertySchemaFieldUI
enum remains unchanged, but ensure that its usage is consistent with the removal of related types and interfaces.Verification successful
The usage of
PropertySchemaFieldUI
is consistent and integrated.The
PropertySchemaFieldUI
enum is consistently used across the codebase, with functions for conversion, validation, and marshaling. There is no evidence of any related types or interfaces being removed that would affect its usage. The enum is well-integrated into the current architecture.
convert_property.go
: Handles conversion toPropertySchemaFieldUI
.models_gen.go
: Defines the enum and related functions.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of `PropertySchemaFieldUI` to ensure consistency with removed types. # Test: Search for occurrences of `PropertySchemaFieldUI`. Expect: Consistent usage with new architecture. rg --type go 'PropertySchemaFieldUI'Length of output: 6541
418-424
: Verify the impact of changes onMergedPropertyField
.The
MergedPropertyField
struct remains unchanged, but ensure that its usage is consistent with the removal of related types and interfaces.Verification successful
Usage of
MergedPropertyField
is consistent. TheMergedPropertyField
struct is used extensively in the GraphQL schema and execution context, and there is no indication of inconsistencies or issues arising from the removal of related types or interfaces.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of `MergedPropertyField` to ensure consistency with removed types. # Test: Search for occurrences of `MergedPropertyField`. Expect: Consistent usage with new architecture. rg --type go 'MergedPropertyField'Length of output: 9793
388-390
: Verify the impact of changes onLinkDatasetToPropertyValueInput
.The
LinkDatasetToPropertyValueInput
struct remains unchanged, but ensure that its usage is consistent with the removal of related types and interfaces.
731-739
: Verify the impact of changes onPropertyField
.The
PropertyField
struct remains unchanged, but ensure that its usage is consistent with the removal of related types and interfaces.Verification successful
Usage of
PropertyField
is consistent and unaffected by removed types.The
PropertyField
struct is used extensively throughout the codebase, including in GraphQL resolvers and MongoDB documents. There are no inconsistencies or missing types affecting its usage. The concern about ensuring consistency with removed types is unfounded based on the current evidence.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of `PropertyField` to ensure consistency with removed types. # Test: Search for occurrences of `PropertyField`. Expect: Consistent usage with new architecture. rg --type go 'PropertyField'Length of output: 42028
954-967
: Review theScene
struct for consistency with removed fields.The
Scene
struct has been modified, with several fields removed. Ensure that these changes align with the new architecture and verify that no functionality is unintentionally affected.
Overview
What I've done
Seperate Beta Server from Classic Server
https://www.notion.so/eukarya/Seperate-Beta-Server-from-Classic-Server-1fe9f7420dac410a92f2eebf89646341
What I haven't done
How I tested
Which point I want you to review particularly
Memo
Summary by CodeRabbit
CreateScene
.golangci-lint
action to improve code quality checks.