Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(migrations): class-based migration for packageRules #16390

Merged

Conversation

RahulGautamSingh
Copy link
Collaborator

@RahulGautamSingh RahulGautamSingh commented Jul 2, 2022

Changes

  • class-based migration of the properties of packgaRules

Context

Documentation (please check one with an [x])

  • I have updated the documentation, or
  • No documentation update is required

How I've tested my work (please tick one)

I have verified these changes via:

  • Code inspection only, or
  • Newly added/modified unit tests, or
  • No unit tests but ran on a real repository, or
  • Both unit tests + ran on a real repository

@RahulGautamSingh RahulGautamSingh marked this pull request as draft July 2, 2022 15:49
@RahulGautamSingh RahulGautamSingh marked this pull request as ready for review July 4, 2022 17:20
JamieMagee
JamieMagee previously approved these changes Jul 6, 2022
@rarkins rarkins requested a review from viceice July 10, 2022 09:57
Co-authored-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@visualon.de>
@RahulGautamSingh RahulGautamSingh requested a review from viceice July 11, 2022 03:17
@viceice viceice enabled auto-merge (squash) July 11, 2022 04:48
@viceice viceice merged commit 5774fb3 into renovatebot:main Jul 11, 2022
@renovate-release
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 This PR is included in version 32.110.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 11, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants