[v2024.3-2025.1]: feature: headers in case of worker error #136
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Valery Piashchynski <piashchynski.valery@gmail.com>
WalkthroughThe pull request updates the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files ignored due to path filters (3)
Files selected for processing (2)
Additional comments not posted (10)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- proxy/proxy.go (6 hunks)
- server.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
server.go (1)
65-65: Enhanced logging with named logger approved.The introduction of a named logger specific to each service in the
proxy.NewProxycall is a good enhancement for better tracking and debugging of service interactions. Ensure that this change is tested for any potential performance impacts.Run the following script to verify the performance impact:
Verification successful
The provided script does not perform any actual verification of the performance impact of the new logging mechanism. To properly assess the performance impact, we need to gather relevant metrics or logs. Let's explore the codebase for any performance-related changes or configurations that might have been affected by the introduction of the named logger.
No direct performance impact found from the new logging mechanism.
The search did not reveal any specific changes or configurations that would indicate a performance impact due to the introduction of the named logger. The system appears to be set up for performance monitoring with existing metrics and logging libraries. If performance concerns persist, consider manually verifying performance metrics during testing.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the performance impact of the new logging mechanism. # Test: Monitor the performance metrics before and after the change. Expect: No significant degradation. echo "Monitor performance metrics for any significant changes."Length of output: 122
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for performance-related configurations or metrics collection in the codebase. rg 'performance|metrics|logging' -A 5Length of output: 7415
proxy/proxy.go (3)
70-70: Logger field addition approved.The addition of the
log *zap.Loggerfield to theProxystruct is a positive change for enhanced logging capabilities. Ensure that the logger is properly initialized and used consistently across the proxy's operations.Run the following script to verify the logger initialization and usage:
Verification successful
Logger Initialization and Usage Verified
The
log *zap.Loggerfield in theProxystruct is properly initialized and used consistently across the codebase. The logger is initialized inserver.goand utilized in various files for logging different levels of information, ensuring enhanced logging capabilities.
- Initialization: The logger is initialized in
server.gowhen creating a newProxyinstance.- Usage: The logger is used in
server.go,proxy/proxy.go,health_server.go, andplugin.gofor logging at different levels.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the initialization and usage of the logger in the `Proxy` struct. # Test: Search for logger initialization and usage. Expect: Proper initialization and consistent usage. rg --type go 'log *zap.Logger' -A 5Length of output: 37
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the initialization of the `Proxy` struct and usage of the `log` field. # Search for the initialization of the `Proxy` struct. rg --type go 'Proxy{' -A 5 # Search for any usage of the `log` field in the codebase. rg --type go '\.log\.' -A 3Length of output: 2065
81-81: Constructor parameter addition approved.The addition of the
log *zap.Loggerparameter to theNewProxyconstructor is necessary for passing the logger to theProxystruct. Ensure that this change does not disrupt existing constructor calls.Run the following script to verify the constructor calls:
Verification successful
Constructor parameter addition verified.
The addition of the
log *zap.Loggerparameter to theNewProxyconstructor has been successfully integrated. The constructor call inserver.gohas been updated to include this new parameter, ensuring that existing functionality is not disrupted.
server.go: TheNewProxycall includes thelogparameter as expected.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the constructor calls for `NewProxy`. # Test: Search for constructor calls. Expect: Updated calls with the new parameter. rg --type go 'NewProxy' -A 5Length of output: 741
225-237: Enhanced error handling in metadata processing approved.The changes to the
responseMetadatamethod enhance its resilience by logging errors related to header unmarshalling instead of returning them. This ensures that errors are logged for review without disrupting the overall execution flow. Verify that this new error handling flow does not obscure or lose important error information.Run the following script to verify the error handling flow:
Verification successful
Error handling strategy in
responseMetadatais appropriate.The
responseMetadatamethod correctly distinguishes between critical and non-critical errors. Critical errors during the initial JSON unmarshalling are returned, while non-critical errors related to header unmarshalling are logged. This ensures that important errors are not obscured and are visible for debugging purposes. The current implementation aligns with the review comment's concerns about error visibility.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the error handling flow in the `responseMetadata` method. # Test: Search for error handling logic. Expect: Errors are logged and not returned. rg --type go 'responseMetadata' -A 20Length of output: 1534
Signed-off-by: Valery Piashchynski <piashchynski.valery@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Valery Piashchynski <piashchynski.valery@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Valery Piashchynski <piashchynski.valery@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Valery Piashchynski <piashchynski.valery@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Valery Piashchynski <piashchynski.valery@gmail.com>
rustatian
changed the title
Signed-off-by: Valery Piashchynski <piashchynski.valery@gmail.com>
Reason for This PR
closes: roadrunner-server/roadrunner#2006
Description of Changes
License Acceptance
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the MIT license.
PR Checklist
[Author TODO: Meet these criteria.][Reviewer TODO: Verify that these criteria are met. Request changes if not]git commit -s).CHANGELOG.md.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Chores