add Map.toContain... infix samples

[danherrera]

These are the map infix samples. Please let me know if the samples are what is expected. It wasn't clear to me when certain filler words were required (o, the), but they were in order to compile and have the tests pass. Thank you!

---

I confirm that I have read the Contributor Agreements v1.0, agree to be bound on them and confirm that my contribution is compliant.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (a668d79) 91.91% compared to head (155e05d) 91.91%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #1567   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     91.91%   91.91%           
  Complexity      114      114           
=========================================
  Files           424      424           
  Lines          4600     4600           
  Branches        228      228           
=========================================
  Hits           4228     4228           
  Misses          326      326           
  Partials         46       46           

Flag	Coverage Δ
current	91.47% <ø> (ø)
current_windows	90.60% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
...fix/en_GB/mapLikeToCntainInAnyOrderOnlyCreators.kt	100.00% <ø> (ø)
.../infix/en_GB/mapLikeToContainInAnyOrderCreators.kt	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...infix/en_GB/mapLikeToContainInOrderOnlyCreators.kt	93.75% <ø> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[danherrera]

Based on the feedback from #1565, I will update the comments to be more explanatory

[robstoll]

Good, waiting for the adjustments and will merge afterwards

[robstoll]

@danherrera thanks, LGTM 🙂 👍 let's wait for CI.

[robstoll]

@danherrera I saw now that you missed to cover entries (you had an entries but it should have been named entriesKeyValue, I already fixed that). I guess I see why you missed it, it is named a bit different in api-infix since it is using the as filler.
expect(mapOf(1 to "a")) toContain o inAny order the pairs(1 to "2")

Do you fancy to write a sample for it as well?