Hook-up endianness & sizeof(long) detection code in SHA-1 implementation #90
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This makes the SHA-1 implementation valid for big endian architectures as well.
|
Test failure is presumably due to #89 (with that change it passes the tests for me). |
|
Thank you very much! |
|
I drafted a new release with your bugfix, as it is a rather important fix ;-) |
jeredfloyd
pushed a commit
to jeredfloyd/postsrsd
that referenced
this pull request
May 4, 2022
…ion (roehling#90) This makes the SHA-1 implementation valid for big endian architectures as well.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This makes the SHA-1 implementation valid for big endian architectures as well.
(This was triggered by a build failure of the Debian packaging on s390x, see https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=postsrsd&arch=s390x&ver=1.5-1&stamp=1548202296&raw=0).