Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(ci): add baseline CI #2

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
May 3, 2024
Merged

feat(ci): add baseline CI #2

merged 6 commits into from
May 3, 2024

Conversation

MSevey
Copy link
Contributor

@MSevey MSevey commented Apr 23, 2024

Overview

Adding baseline CI via copying in .github from rollkit and editing.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced automated dependency updates and default reviewer settings for pull requests.
    • Added a pull request template to standardize submissions.
    • Implemented continuous integration and release automation workflows.
    • Automated housekeeping tasks for issue and pull request management.
    • Enhanced code quality checks with multiple linter setups.
    • Enforced semantic naming for pull request titles to maintain consistency.
    • Setup workflows for testing and code coverage checks in the project.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 23, 2024

Warning

Rate Limit Exceeded

@MSevey has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 36 minutes and 0 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.
Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.
Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3a6630c and cb6d917.

Walkthrough

The recent updates bring a comprehensive suite of GitHub workflows and configurations to streamline code reviews, automate dependency updates, and enhance CI processes. These changes aim to boost efficiency, maintain code quality, and provide clear guidelines for contributors.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/auto_request_review.yml,
.github/dependabot.yml
Introduce auto review settings and automate dependency updates.
.github/pull_request_template.md Provides a structured template for pull requests.
.github/workflows/.../ci_release.yml,
.github/workflows/.../test.yml
Set up CI/CD and testing workflows for integration and release.
.github/workflows/.../housekeeping.yml,
.github/workflows/.../lint.yml,
.github/workflows/.../semantic-pull-request.yml
Introduce housekeeping tasks, linting, and enforce semantic pull request titles.

🐰✨🌟
In the garden of code, where the bits all align,
The rabbits have worked, making everything fine.
With a hop and a skip, they set workflows in place,
Now pull requests flow with a much swifter pace.
Cheers to the team, with each merge, we advance!
🌟✨🐰


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@MSevey MSevey requested review from tzdybal, adlerjohn, gupadhyaya and tuxcanfly and removed request for adlerjohn April 23, 2024 18:23
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

.github/workflows/test.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/lint.yml (1)

22-22: Clarify the comment about GIT_DIFF environment variable.

The comment on line 22 is unclear. It mentions setting GIT_DIFF to true if files defined in PATTERNS changed, but it's not evident how this is achieved since the get-diff-action does not explicitly set this environment variable. Consider adding a step to explicitly set GIT_DIFF based on the output of get-diff-action.

@MSevey MSevey self-assigned this Apr 30, 2024
@gupadhyaya gupadhyaya added this pull request to the merge queue May 3, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 473d941 May 3, 2024
9 checks passed
@adlerjohn adlerjohn deleted the sevey/ci branch May 5, 2024 15:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants