chore: update all goversion to goversionfile

[MSevey]

Overview

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • CI workflow now triggers on a broader range of version tags.
  • Go version is automatically derived from the go.mod file, simplifying the workflow setup.

• Bug Fixes

  • Removed dependencies on a setup job for linting and testing, streamlining processes.

• Chores

  • Minor formatting adjustments made for consistency across workflow files.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to multiple CI workflow files within the GitHub repository. Key modifications include the removal of explicit Go version inputs in favor of deriving the version from the go.mod file, simplification of event triggers for version tags, and the elimination of a setup job that defined the Go version. These adjustments streamline the CI processes while broadening the scope of version tags that can initiate workflows.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
.github/workflows/ci_release.yml	Removed the setup job; updated lint and test jobs to eliminate dependency on setup.
.github/workflows/lint.yml	Removed inputs.go-version; Go version now derives from go.mod.
.github/workflows/proto.yml	Minor formatting change: removed single quotes around go.mod filename.
.github/workflows/test.yml	Removed inputs.go-version; Go version now derives from go.mod.

Possibly related PRs

• chore: update dependabot.yml #104: The changes in .github/dependabot.yml involve updates to dependency management for Go modules, which may relate to the broader context of managing Go versions in the CI workflows.

Suggested labels

T:enhancement

Suggested reviewers

• tuxcanfly
• yarikbratashchuk
• Manav-Aggarwal
• gupadhyaya

Poem

🐇 In the meadow where the code does flow,
Changes made, watch the workflows grow.
No more setup, just the go.mod cheer,
Simplified paths, the future is clear!
Hopping along, with each version tag,
Our CI's spry, no reason to lag! 🌼

---

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 04e312a and c8ea58f.

Files selected for processing (4)

• .github/workflows/ci_release.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/lint.yml (2 hunks)
• .github/workflows/proto.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/test.yml (3 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• .github/workflows/proto.yml

Additional comments not posted (7)

.github/workflows/ci_release.yml (2)

8-8: Verify the intended behavior of the simplified tag pattern.

The change to the tag pattern broadens the scope of tags that will trigger the workflow. This allows for more flexibility in versioning schemes but could also potentially trigger the workflow unintentionally if tags are not carefully managed.

Please confirm that this simplified pattern aligns with the intended behavior and consider the potential risk of unintended workflow triggers.

---

Line range hint 1-52: Provide rationale for the removal of the setup job and its impact on the workflow.

The removal of the setup job, which previously defined a consistent Go version for the pipeline, implies a shift in how the Go version is managed. The lint and test jobs have also been updated to eliminate their dependencies on the setup job.

Please provide the rationale behind these changes and explain how the Go version will be managed going forward. Also, consider the potential impact on the consistency of the Go version used during the lint and test processes.

.github/workflows/test.yml (3)

15-15: LGTM!

Using the go-version-file parameter to set the Go version from the go.mod file is a good practice. It simplifies the workflow and ensures consistency with the project's Go version.

---

28-28: LGTM!

Using the go-version-file parameter to set the Go version from the go.mod file is a good practice. It simplifies the workflow and ensures consistency with the project's Go version.

---

45-45: LGTM!

Using the go-version-file parameter to set the Go version from the go.mod file is a good practice. It simplifies the workflow and ensures consistency with the project's Go version.

.github/workflows/lint.yml (2)

15-15: LGTM!

The change to derive the Go version from the go.mod file is a good improvement. It simplifies the workflow configuration and ensures that the project's specified Go version is always used.

---

53-53: LGTM!

This change is consistent with the previous one and ensures that the protobuf-lint job also uses the Go version specified in the go.mod file.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.