Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update ci to use a single GO_VERSION setting in ci_release.yml #19

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2024

Conversation

ramin
Copy link
Contributor

@ramin ramin commented Nov 2, 2023

Overview

update ci to use a single GO_VERSION setting in ci_release.yml and set that version to output and uses in descendent workflows refs #16

Checklist

  • New and updated code has appropriate documentation
  • New and updated code has new and/or updated testing
  • Required CI checks are passing
  • Visual proof for any user facing features like CLI or documentation updates
  • Linked issues closed with keywords

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Introduced a new "setup" job in the CI release workflow, which sets and outputs the Go version. This change enhances consistency and dependency management in the workflow.
    • Updated the variable name from GO_VERSION to go-version in the lint and test workflows, ensuring uniformity across different workflows.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 2, 2023

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new setup job in the CI release workflow to manage and output the Go version for subsequent jobs. The input variable GO_VERSION has been renamed to go-version for consistency across the lint and test workflows, enhancing configurability and uniformity.

Changes

File Path Summary
.github/workflows/ci_release.yml Added a setup job to establish and output the Go version, with dependencies updated in the lint and test jobs.
.github/workflows/lint.yml
.github/workflows/test.yml
Altered GO_VERSION to go-version for uniformity, ensuring consistent usage within the workflows.

🐇🍂
In the season of fall, when leaves take their flight,
CodeRabbit hops in, making everything right.
With a tweak here and there, in the moon's gentle light,
Our workflows now run with much more delight.
So here's to the changes, small and grand,
Crafted carefully by CodeRabbit's hand. 🎉🥕


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
Early access features: disabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • Anthropic claude-3-5-sonnet for code reviews: Anthropic claims that the new Claude model has stronger code understanding and code generation capabilities than their previous models. Note: Our default code review model was also updated late last week. Please compare the quality of the reviews between the two models by toggling the early access feature.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.
  • Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues on the discussion post.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 57bc360 and cabe74c.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/ci_release.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/lint.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • .github/workflows/ci_release.yml
  • .github/workflows/lint.yml
  • .github/workflows/test.yml

tzdybal
tzdybal previously approved these changes May 10, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cabe74c and 15ccd6b.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/ci_release.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/lint.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/lint.yml
  • .github/workflows/test.yml
Additional comments not posted (3)
.github/workflows/ci_release.yml (3)

27-37: The setup job is well-configured to centralize the Go version setting, ensuring consistency across workflows.


40-43: The lint job correctly depends on the setup job for the Go version, ensuring that it uses the centralized setting.


46-49: The test job correctly depends on the setup job for the Go version, ensuring that it uses the centralized setting.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 15ccd6b and e817661.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/ci_release.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/lint.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/lint.yml
  • .github/workflows/test.yml
Additional comments not posted (4)
.github/workflows/ci_release.yml (4)

27-37: LGTM!

The new setup job is a great addition to centralize the Go version configuration and ensure consistency across the pipeline.


40-43: LGTM!

The changes to the lint job ensure that it uses the Go version defined in the setup job, improving maintainability.


46-49: LGTM!

The changes to the test job ensure that it uses the Go version defined in the setup job, improving maintainability.


43-43: LGTM!

Renaming the input variable from GO_VERSION to go-version improves consistency across the workflows.

Also applies to: 49-49

…hat version to output and uses in descendent workflows refs rollkit#16
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.55%. Comparing base (02a78bb) to head (ba04774).
Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #19      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.54%   79.55%   +4.00%     
==========================================
  Files           5        5              
  Lines         274      225      -49     
==========================================
- Hits          207      179      -28     
+ Misses         52       33      -19     
+ Partials       15       13       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e817661 and ba04774.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/ci_release.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/lint.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/lint.yml
  • .github/workflows/test.yml
Additional comments not posted (3)
.github/workflows/ci_release.yml (3)

27-38: LGTM!

The setup job is correctly configured to:

  • Run on ubuntu-latest.
  • Set the Go version using the GO_VERSION environment variable.
  • Output the Go version for subsequent jobs using the set-vars step.

The job is correctly named and placed in the workflow.


40-43: LGTM!

The lint job is correctly modified to:

  • Depend on the setup job.
  • Use the Go version defined in the setup job's output.

46-49: LGTM!

The test job is correctly modified to:

  • Depend on the setup job.
  • Use the Go version defined in the setup job's output.

@tzdybal tzdybal requested review from tuxcanfly, gupadhyaya, Manav-Aggarwal and MSevey and removed request for sysrex and smuu September 2, 2024 15:53
Copy link
Member

@Manav-Aggarwal Manav-Aggarwal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tzdybal tzdybal added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 2, 2024
Merged via the queue into rollkit:main with commit 1fccc41 Sep 2, 2024
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants